Anti-intellectual behaviour of university students
|Sir Ivor Jennings, the
first Vice-Chancellor of the University of Peradeniya, lucidly
explained the goal of modern university education as follows:
The fundamental task is to produce men and
women who are capable of fulfilling any function in the world
that may fall to their lot, citizens of high intelligence,
complete moral integrity and possessing energy, initiative,
judgement, tact, and qualities of leadership” (Jennings, 1948).
This statement provides a yardstick against which the modern
university education can be measured. The purpose of this article is to
examine the fundamental challenges the Sri Lanka universities face in
realizing the above laudable goals.
As a university academic serving for over 15 years at Sri Lankan
Universities and six years in international universities, I had the
opportunity to read and closely observe the inner workings of the
Universities and the challenges they face both in Sri Lanka and outside.
As highlighted by many policy makers and academics, a long list of
factors have contributed towards the decline of the Sri Lanka
Among them, the politicization of the universities, poor quality
academics, lack of competition among the departments and the
universities, opening up of universities with minimum facilities, in
sufficient research grants and facilities and the brain drain among both
faculty and students are most significant and warrant detailed
However, these problems pale in comparison when one studies closely
the anti-intellectual behaviour of Sri Lankan university students led by
the student union sympathetic to JVP, the subject matter of this
Sadly, the most notable feature is the destructive behaviour of the
Sri Lankan University students since the 1970s and especially since the
late 1980s when the Janatha Vimukthi Peramuna (JVP) took control of the
students’ unions using intimidation, violence and terror against the
larger student body to subdue the students into their ideological and
The JVP and the informal, if not illegal organization called Inter
University Students Federation (IUSF) and the Socialist Student Unions
turned the Universities into centres of anti-politics and recruiting
ground for future JVP carders.
During the last 30 years and especially the last 15 years, the JVP
and its affiliated student unions thus began to turn the above goal -
producing the university students who are generally incapable of
fulfilling any function in the world that may fall into their lot,
citizens of poor intelligence, lacking moral integrity, and devoid of
energy, initiative, judgement, tact and qualities of leadership.
Exploring the answers to the question as to how did the JVP and its
affiliated student unions created this unfortunate transformation is the
theme of this article. The empirical basis for this article is the
Faculty of Arts at the Peradeniya University but the experience in other
Faculties at Peradeniya and in other Universities have many parallels
and thus the issues raised here is more systematic covering of the
entire university sector.
The main strategies through which the student union and its leaders
undermine the intellectual authority of the university and establish
what is essentially an anti-intellectual and anti-democratic often
violent and ideologically suppressed student culture are ragging,
opposing democracy in student politics, deliberate creation of chaotic
events, undermining the national and university rules and regulations.
Let me elaborate on these subversive and perilous tactics of the
student unions and leaders by highlighting not only the practices but
warning the readers of the ruinous repercussions they inflict upon of
the University education in this country.
Before I proceed, I need to tell the readership of the profile of the
contemporary University student.
As we all know, only a few students who are qualified the national
level examination have the opportunity, more correctly the priviledge to
enter the University. These privileged few are actually the cream of the
nation with all the potential to take the country into new heights in
every sphere of activity and to become men and women as Sir Jennings
hoped, provided they are not hijacked by student union extremism, lunacy
What happens to the genius of these students once they come to the
University at the hands of deleterious student leaders?
The University students today, are no longer children under the age
of 18 but matured men and women whose average age is about 22 years when
they enter the University. They are adults.
The University students of today are men and women entrusted with the
sacred responsibility of democratic right to vote and engage in
responsible politics and to become a beacon of light and an example to
the larger nation in democratic politics.
But what happens to these men and women once they come to the
University at the hands of pernicious and harmful student leaders? The
University students today, come from ordinary civilized families of this
These students are the best in their schools, not only in academic
performance but also in their ethical and civic behaviour as good,
decent and law-abiding children. But what happens to these adorable
students once they come to the University at the hand of indecorous,
evil-minded and immoral JVP student leaders?
The majority come from the poor and lower middle class backgrounds.
They are the hope of their families to bring economic prosperity and
But what happens to these students with all the potential to lead
this nation in the fiercely competitive global economy at the hands of
backward and hypocritical student leaders who continue to see the world
through the failed extremist socialist dogma which preaches that
eliminating the rich is the only means of eradicating poverty by hating
affluence, money, profit, private capital, economic competition,
globalization and innovation!
The answer to these questions are all known to this nation but what
is not known is how do the student unions and leaders have been able to
make this transformation inside our Universities which are funded by the
tax paid by the ordinary citizens of this country. The rest of the
article is an elaboration of this dangerous process.
Ragging mobilized by the student leaders with their overt and covert
blessings and support from the JVP student unions in the University is
no longer poking fun at the new students or trying to create a leveled
social field among the students coming from diverse economic, social and
cultural backgrounds as pontificated by the student union leaders when
they address the new students and parents on the opening day of the
The era of ragging as a social equalizer and an initiation into the
University culture is long gone. Ragging has today become a political
and a terror weapon used primarily to ensure the continuing domination
of JVP political power within the Universities. Gone are the days, when
ragging was a phenomenon confined to the bounds of the University.
Today, the ugly hand of ragging has spread to the very homes of the
students and it starts immediately after they receive the selection
letter from the UGC. The network of present and former students,
secretly approach the selected students and pressurize them to bring a
defined set of attire (ankle high black skirts for girls and black pants
without belts for the boys, rubber slippers, and a backpack).
The fear of the unknown, mixed with the fear of the generally known
dangers of ragging at the University push the students and sadly their
parents to comply with these dictates.
Back at the University, the student union demands an active role in
the official process of welcoming the new students primarily to gain
legitimacy among the new students and their parents attending the
Although it is not required, neither necessary, the authorities
eventually budge into their demands which include an official speaking
slot at the welcoming ceremony which is addressed by the
Vice-Chancellor, the Dean and other senior officials and academics, and
separate time slots for union organized activities during the official
initiation period which may run into several days.
The writer is attached to the Department of Geography, University of
To be continued