Sri Lanka ensures:
Transparent policy on human rights issues
In an interview with the Daily News Disaster
Management and Human Rights Minister Mahinda Samarasinghe speaks about
Sri Lanka’s recent diplomatic triumphs. Its international human rights
obligations and the way forward.
Rasika SOMARATHNA
Excerpts of the interview:
Q: Sri Lanka has had several diplomatic triumphs in recent
times including the one at the UN Human Rights Council special session,
what is your observation?
Minister Mahinda Samarasinghe |
A: Sri Lanka has always maintained a transparent and
accommodative stance when facing, issues related to the armed conflict
as well as its human rights obligations. We have never shied away from
deliberating related issues in any international fora. We have always
maintained that any allegations should be properly investigated before
pointing the finger. Thus I personally think that our been able to
garner majority support is an endorsement on the stand taken by us. It
also has sent a clear message to the rest of the world that here was a
country which had successfully eradicated terrorism after three decades
of bloodshed, and had liberated 250,000 people from the clutches of
terrorism and that this success should be acknowledged. Also what the
international community and the UN should be doing is to support Sri
Lanka in meeting the future challenges that it has to meet in looking
after these liberated civilians and resettling them.
Q: However a few member countries voted against Sri Lanka at
the concluded UNHRC special session?
A: Yes, and these countries proposed nine amendments to our
resolutions at the last moment, with the hope of diluting our
resolution. But at the end, the Council decided that Sri Lanka and the
other co-sponsors had accommodated many changes to the original
resolution and had been quite flexible in this regard. Thus they decided
that there was no need to make further amendments. This decision was
endorsed by a vote where the majority of the Council voted in favour. In
my view the adverse and aggressive propaganda by a section of the Tamil
Diaspora, acting on false and one sided information, had misled these
countries. In recent times supporters of the LTTE has come out on the
streets openly in Western capitals, lobbying these countries to the
extent of pushing them to take this course of action against Sri Lanka.
In this regard our counter propaganda abroad has been found wanting at
times. Thus, it is essential for us to maintain a close dialogue and
better information sharing methods with these nations in the future.
Thus, they would be able to take a more balanced approach in the future
when they have to take positions when faced with similar situations in
the future.
Q: Don’t you think that the UN and the International Community
has a legitimate right to raise concerns on issues related to human
rights obligations of other countries?
Security Personnel providing medical assistance to an
elderly civilian. (ANCL file photo) |
A: Of course it does, and the international community voiced
their concerns at the UN Human Rights Council, which we took on board in
our resolution. We are conscious of a need to apprehend wrongdoers and
violators of human rights. In the case of Sri Lanka we have always
maintained a stand up diplomatic policy in this regard. We have always
taken a very practical and open stance and have not shied away from
engaging in dialogue with concerned parties. But in this case we did not
want to be in the focus of attention of the council having ended a three
decade old conflict successfully, and liberated nearly 250,000 civilians
held hostage by a terrorist organization. The situation in Sri Lanka was
essentially an internal matter which the majority of the members too had
acknowledged during deliberations. Thus the vote showed that the
overwhelming majority of the peoples of the world were with Sri Lanka,
and not its critics.
Q: How has Sri Lanka responded to its international
obligations in promoting and protecting human rights over the years?
A: We have engaged with the International Community in a
constructive and consistent basis and always cooperated as far back as
the 1980s by subscribing to 13 core international human rights
conventions and several optional protocols. We have put in place 11
pieces of domestic legislation which has given effect to the ICCPR and
has effectively put in motion the implementation of these rights. We
have put in place mechanisms to protect children in armed conflict to
prevent recruitment of child soldiers. Sri Lanka is a multi cultural
multi lingual multi ethnic and multi religious society. This is the
great diversity and the strength of Sri Lanka . And we are committed and
we believe in the fact that it is only through the protection and
nurturing of this diversity that we can build the unity that we need to
overcome the challenges that are before us in the national,
reconstruction and development efforts that our country needs to put in
place towards our goal of sustainable peace and development.
Q: Human Rights groups and certain Western nations have been
calling for an outside inquiry into alleged human rights abuses which
they say took place during the last phase of the conflict?
A: This so called outside inquiry was not acceptable to a
clear majority in the Human Rights Council. Sri Lanka too does not see
the need for such an inquiry. What is needed now is a process to heal
the wounds inflicted by the three decade old conflict. The best way
forwards is by way of a reconciliation process which is something that
should be also home grown. Our Ministry hopes to take a lead role in
putting in place such a mechanism with the concurrence of the President
and the Cabinet of Ministers.
What is important now is to rebuild the country and provide equal
opportunities\rights to all its citizens especially those who have
suffered as a result of this conflict. Thus, it is not the time to go
back and ask for lengthy probes. The need of the hour is to lend support
to nurture this reconciliation and development process.
Q: Do you think that Sri Lanka should adopt a strategy to win
back a section of the Tamil Diaspora which has come out openly against
the Government during their demonstrations, especially in Western
capitals?
A: Definitely; we see this as another important challenge, and
we have already initiated a scheme, to reach out to the Tamil Diaspora
living abroad. Thus with such a constructive dialogue and confidence
building measures we can embark on our own reunification process and
reconciliation process which is vital to ensuring non repetition of a
similar conflict in the future.
Q: What are the Government’s future plans for the displaced
civilians?
A: Our objective is to resettle all displaced people in their
homes in the shortest possible time. However the decision to go back
should be decided by the people themselves. What we have to do is to
ensure that the environment is created, conducively, so that an informed
choice can be made by the people themselves whether they want to go back
to their homes or not. Until such time we are committed to looking after
our people ensuring their well-being.
Q: There is a call by certain organizations to allow more
access to IDP Welfare Villages\centers for NGOs and INGOs?
A: Today 52 International Non Governmental Organizations and
other non governmental organizations are working side by side with
government officials in complementing efforts of the Government.
They are given all necessary support to complement Government
efforts. However those who are willing to support should come up with
specific targets and necessary funding. I have never encountered any
situation where INGOs or NGOs has told us that there are people dying of
malnourishment, of starvation and there is lack of food, medicine etc.
So for the record 250,000 of our citizens are being well looked after
and cared for, and we will continue to show that commitment and we will
continue to offer access and facilitate our partners in the
international community to complement efforts of the Government within a
national framework.
|