Humanitarian contradictions
There is universal condemnation today of the
LTTE for the continued holding of civilians as a human shield in the
tiny stretch of land it still holds, thanks to the cautious operation by
the Security Forces. This extends from the UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon
to his Under Secretary General on Humanitarian Affairs, the Indian
authorities, the British and French Foreign Ministers, the Co-Chairs of
the Tokyo Peace Process (US, ED, Japan and Norway) and many others.
In his latest briefing on the Sri Lankan situation, April 15, John
Holmes, UN Under Secretary General for Humanitarian Affairs says: “The
UN agencies, International Committee of the Red Cross and our staff and
people, when they came out of the LTTE hold they made it absolutely
clear that people were being held against their will. They had to flee
and if they try to leave they are being fired upon. When they try to
flee, huge pressure is put on them against their leaving like forced
recruitment of the civilians including children against their will, to
fight or work for the LTTE. (Emphasis mine) There may be some immediate
family members who may stay but overwhelming majority would want to get
out at least for safety reasons irrespective of political reasons.”
Call for a ceasefire
With all this body of opinion ranged against what is acknowledged as
the most ruthless terrorist organization in the world, with a clear
understanding of its policies directed against the civilians under its
control, it is strange that the same people and institutions that make
these charges are seeking to put pressure on the Government to bring
about a ceasefire in its humanitarian military operations against the
LTTE.
They seek a “humanitarian pause” and various other ruses to halt
moves to put down this terrorist organization, banned in most of the
countries that call for a “humanitarian pause” or ceasefire, allegedly
in the interests of the Tamil civilians who are held against their will
by the LTTE.
Bundle of contradictions
All of this is a huge bundle of contradictions, which needs
explanation. Firstly, the Government has clearly stated that what it is
carrying out is a humanitarian military operation, in fact a
humanitarian mission to free the Tamil people of the North and East from
the clutches of LTTE terror.
Civilians are the priority |
It has succeeded in most vast areas of the East and North, nearly one
third of the country, where the LTTE once held sway, and has now pushed
into sliver of land it still lords over. To allow the LTTE the freedom
to carry on with its terror over those who are allegedly its “own” Tamil
people, who it claims to “liberate” will not only a be a folly of
unprecedented proportions but a gross violation of the very principles
of humanitarian action, whatever the well-fed, well-paid, well-oiled,
often violent and comfortably ensconced expatriate Tamils in western
countries, having no aims of returning whatever of returning to Lanka
and sharing the suffering of their Tamil brethren under the LTTE, their
agents, apologists, and so many others may say of the present situation.
‘Humanitarian pause’
It is a basic contradiction to have a “humanitarian pause” to a
humanitarian operation - military or otherwise. The people who have so
far been liberated from the LTTE’s clutches, including more than 65,000
who have recently fled to the Safe Zone in Mullaitivu are poof of the
humanitarian nature of this military operation. And now to pauses, and
there results. President Mahinda Rajapaksa announced a 48-hour period of
defensive action in January his year to allow Tami civilian to leave the
LTTE held area. It was not productive.
The LTTE imposed harsh methods of holding them back. The Government
announced another a pause of 48 hours during the recent Sinhala and
Tamil New Year period, which also coincided with Easter, the results
were even worse than what happened in January. We have the words of John
Holmes himself as proof of this.
Being realistic
“There seems to be less civilians getting out during the [New Year]
pause than before. So it is clear that LTTE did not allow those who
wished to leave even if they wished to leave the area during this pause
to do so, they seemed to be actively prevented from doing so, perhaps
more actively prevented from doing so during this pause, so that is a
matter for great regret.” (John Holmes - Briefing at the UN - April 15,
09)
A military solution is, in some circumstances, the best way
to save civilian lives. Pictures by Rukmal Gamage |
This must be clear to all other than John Holmes, the British and
French Foreign Ministers David Miliband and Bernard Boucher and the UN
Secretary General itself, that no among of so-called “humanitarian
pauses” can bring about the results that are beneficial to the Tamil
civilians held hostage by the LTTE. It is now time to cut this crap
about such pauses, and also take note of John Holmes’ more realistic
assessment of the possibility of ceasefire, as he explained it in New
York, April 15.
“It is pretty clear frankly however that a ceasefire is not something
that is available in the present circumstances. We are trying to do
something realistic in the present circumstances.” What of the other
realities that have emerged? Answering a question on the number of
people killed and injured in the LTTE’s stand-of at Mullaitivu, John
Holmes has told the media thus: “You cannot give verifiable figures.
Dozens may be killed per day. It goes up some days, it goes down other
days. There were reports 50 - 60 killed or injured and other days it is
less but we cannot verify.”
Apart from the fact that one cannot see the logic behind giving
unverified or unverifiable figures, for which the UN Office in Colombo
has earlier apologized, there are also questions about the authenticity
of these figures.
Warning
They could well have come from the LTTE sources the UN now admits to
having contact with. They could also have come from Norway that has told
LTTE demonstrators in Oslo that the UN was in contact with the LTTE. Be
that as it may, let us take the figures as stated, and consider it in
the context of the “imminent bloodbath” that Holmes, Miliband, Boucher
et al and the hyper demonstrative Tamil expatriates in the West keep
warning of.
When there is a pause in the military operations, hardly any people
are allowed to leave; they are restrained from doing so, including the
arming of children. When here is no pause there, about 50 to 60
civilians killed daily - one does not know by whom, or at least the
accusers do not know for certain. However, there is evidence from the
same “humanitarian concerns” that the LTTE does fire at and otherwise
attacks civilians attempting to flee their control. So, if a ceasefire
is unrealistic, as John Holmes admits, yet the Government must not act
swiftly to liberate the balance of Tamil civilians (the figure
interestingly has come down to nearly 100,000 from the once fashionable
200,000 or 300,000 bandied about without verification earlier) one must
allow for 50 to 60 civillians to be killed each day.
Taking the figure of those killed as 50 a day (John Holmes -
unverified), it is 500 in ten days, which is not a bloodbath but only a
trickle from the point of view of these humanitarians. Let it go on for
20 days and it is a 1,000 and we can keep on multiplying. But, meanwhile
there will be large numbers, even in their thousands escaping per day
(John Holmes, again), as it did happen when the fighting was on earlier.
Duty of the Govt
So the logic would be to carry on the fight to liberate the Tamil
civilians, which is the duty and obligation of the Government and in
fact it is Right to Protect (R2P) of its own civilians, which is the
sacred duty of the Government, in the reasonable expectation that the
LTTE can be defeated and the opportunity given to most of the Tamils
held hostage by LTTE terror to escape to freedom.
Let me quote Michael Radu Co-Chairman, US Center on Terrorism,
Counter-Terrorism, and Homeland Security, who should know better on
this: “Ultimately, Western views and policies vis-…-vis Sri Lanka prove
that humanitarian feelings and “human rights” are no policy alternative
to common sense, and that even small countries, if desperate enough,
could solve their secessionist/terrorist problems even despite the
powerful human right NGOs pressures to commit national suicide.
Second, and most important and with wider implications, short term,
obsessive preoccupation with “civilian casualties” is often a death
sentence to civilians in a civil war.
Military solution
“The longer the war, especially when the victory is obvious, the more
civilian casualties. Hence a military solution is, in some
circumstances, the best way to save civilian lives. In general, pacifism
disguised as “human rights” or not, always leads to more death,
especially in remote, third world, small countries vulnerable to the
influence of AI or HRW. Ending a war-by force if need be-protects more
civilians than prolonging it under any pretexts.”
These are realities that have obviously escaped the knowledge of the
tub-thumpers for a ceasefire or the failed humanitarian pauses in Sri
Lanka’s military operations to defeat the LTTE and terrorism. It is
evident today that there is no option but the military defeat of the
LTTE, to assure freedom for the Tamil people under its jackboot of
terror, to arrive at an inclusive, consensual political solution of the
crisis in Sri Lanka’s ethnic relations, sharing of power and other
pressing issues. Those who plead for the LTTE are not helping this cause
of the Tamils and all other Sri Lankans.
Interestingly, John Holmes has admitted that UN is now in contact
with the LTTE, not on the ground, but elsewhere. In the interests of
transparency, it will be useful to know where and when such contacts
have been made with an organization banned by so many member states of
the UN, including permanent members of the Security Council, as an
international terrorist organization. Does the UN have such contacts if
the Janjaweed insurgents in the Sudan, accused of the atrocities in
Dafur? Has it any such contacts with Al Qaeda or the Taliban in
Afghanistan? And, if not, why not?
There is a video clip now in circulation, sent by a Sri Lankan
expatriate in Maryland, USA, which is a shocking record of how the LTTE
cut off both legs of a little boy who tried to run away to freedom,
before his parents and many others. It is too gruesome to be seen by any
child and is hard on most adults too.
One hopes that like that celebrated US photographer’s shot of a
Vietnamese citizen, suspect of being a Vietcong sympathizer, being shot
in the head in public, shocking the American people to intensify
opposition to the Vietnam war, this would also shockt he world into
realizing what the LTTE really is, and that it cannot have sympathy from
any one who speaks for humanitarian causes. |