Unqualified teachers – bane of our education system
M. A. Kaleel
A recent study shockingly revealed that 82% of the teachers teaching
Buddhism in our schools were unqualified and the worst affected was the
central province with 90%. The study also revealed among other things
that of the 8,455 teachers teaching Buddhism a staggering 6,955 teachers
recruited by successive regimes were unqualified and they should not
have been recruited.
Qualified teachers to the education system - the need of the
hour. |
This was a front page news story in The Island of November 24 and was
the Editorial in the Daily News of November 25. In short a Buddhist
Nation has no competent teachers to teach Buddhism. What a damning
indictment of our education.
This is not the first time the issue of unqualified teachers has been
raised. Last year UNP parliamentarian Madduma Bandara dropped a
bombshell in the Parliament that there were 12,000 unqualified teachers
in the schools. This was the Editorial of Daily Mirror the following
day. The UNP and the PA traded allegations as to which party was
responsible for the recruitment of such a large number of unqualified
teachers. When asked what the Education Ministry would do with them, the
Education Services Minister said it was too late to deal with them
(Dinamina). Therefore they would remain in the system and mar the future
of hundreds of thousand students and retire as unqualified teachers.
Readers may wonder how such a large number of unqualified teachers
had infiltrated the teaching profession and remained in the service for
such a long time undetected. To my knowledge the major reasons are the
faulty teacher recruitment systems, and the political and bureaucratic
patronage. Different regimes have adopted different systems of teacher
recruitments. To share with the readers a few of the teacher recruitment
systems hitherto adopted by different regimes are Janasaviya Teacher
Recruitment System, Volunteer Teacher Recruitment System, Contract Basis
Teacher Recruitment System, Samurdhi Teacher Recruitment System, Home
Guard Teacher Recruitment System, Terrorist Victims Teacher Recruitment
System, Political Victimization Teacher recruitment System, National
Cadet Corps Teacher Recruitment System, Competitive Exam Based Teacher
Recruitment System, National Colleges Education Teacher Recruitment
System and Graduate Teacher Recruitment System. Some of these systems
are hopelessly ineffective and the unqualified could have infiltrated
into the teaching profession through one or more of these systems with
political or bureaucratic patronage.
When we say we do not have qualified teachers to teach Buddhism, what
does it means? Are we short of competent people to be recruited as
Buddhism teachers? No. We have ample but we have deliberately failed to
recruit them and train them properly. This applies to English language
teaching as well. We do not have competent teachers to teach English.
The standard of English teachers is abysmally low. Teaching English in
our schools and universities has been a complete fiasco. Now having lost
confidence on the Education Ministry, the President’s Office has taken
over the teaching of English. They look to India to revitalise English
Education in Sri Lanka and a batch of English teachers has already been
trained at the University of Hyderabad.
They also look to the Board of Investment and the Private Sectors to
introduce English as a life skill. Meanwhile, English as a medium of
instruction has also made a comeback with the same host of problems
which led to its overthrowing a few decades ago, and this move has been
strongly opposed by the JVP. There was also a proposal by the Eastern
Provincial Ministry of Education to bring down English teachers from
India to teach English in the schools in the East which was strongly
opposed by the JVP provincial councillor.
Aren’t we barking up the wrong tree? There are many obvious reasons
for our failure in the teaching of English but we have hitherto failed
to rectify them. We do not have a proper English Teacher Recruitment
System. Nor do we have a proper English Teacher Training System.
We do not have a proper English Teacher Supervision System. Nor do we
have a proper English Teacher Placement System. We do not have a proper
Promotion System for them. We can definitely make these systems more
effective but we have deliberately failed to do so.
For instance, the Eastern Provincial Ministry of Education recruited
English teacher through volunteer teacher recruitment system and
contract basis teacher recruitment system and the teachers thus
recruited were so poor in English. They also recruited English teachers
through a competitive exam in General Knowledge and Aptitude not
English. Anyone without any school education knows the problem with
English teachers is their lack of proficiency in English.
But the Eastern Province Education Ministry thought the best way to
maintain the standard of English teachers was to test their knowledge in
General knowledge and Aptitude. Unfortunately we had no one at the
Central Ministry of Education to advise against this. The English
teachers recruited under these systems also included candidates with a
simple pass in O/level English.
Nearly a thousand English teachers recruited under these systems were
for the first time admitted into Government Teachers Colleges in the
North and the East last year. Now they are in the position of the
proverbial man who fell from a tree and gored by a bull. These colleges
are not equipped even to train vernacular teachers. They do not have a
single permanent lecturer for English. English teachers from primary and
secondary schools released on secondment are their English lecturers.
Their libraries do not have a single book on English language teaching.
When some teacher trainees of a GTC petitioned the MOE about shortage of
English lecturers, the Principal of the college threatened them in the
assembly that he would fail them. He told them that their pass or
failure was in his hand not in their performance because 40 percent of
the final marks was in his hand.
He told them that provided they cooperated with the administration
they will all pass out as English Specialist Trained Teachers or they
will fail. Now they are about to complete their course but their
vocabulary is still infantile and they cannot write any sentence other
than a simple sentence beginning with a subject and ending in a full
stop and even these sentences will have at least an error in each.
Anyhow they will pass out as English Specialist Trained Teachers-a
shame for the name. They will either freely copy in the final exam, or
their final papers will be set easy, or their papers will be marked
leniently, or their pass marks will be lowered.
The other day I visited a school which had around thousand students
but the school did not have a single English teacher whereas a popular
school only half a kilometre away from this school had four English
teachers surplus.
The Zonal Education Officer, a senior SLEAS officer who was the
product of the Buy One Get Two Free system of promotion was least
bothered about it. Having made a fine mess of English language teaching
and now look to India to improve the standard of English of our
students.
Education Minister alone cannot improve the education system. He also
needs support and cooperation of the other politicians as well.
Politicians should place the country before their self interest. For
instance the Education Minister formulated a national policy on teacher
recruitment recently but now I understand the policy has been shelved
due to strong protests from his colleagues and opposition politicians.
Another instance is he still considers the appointment of performing
principals as political and refuses to absorb them into permanent cadres
and asks them to go through the normal procedures to be promoted as
principals but there was a directive recently from a top politician to
the Education Minister that action should be taken to absorb them into
the permanent cadres.
There was another move from a Cabinet Minister to lower the
educational qualification for Moulavi teachers’ recruitment to O/level
from A/level but the Education Minister refused to heed it.
These incidents show that the Education Minister also needs
cooperation from other politicians to raise the standard of education.
Above all the Education Minister should also seriously think about
revising the systems of teacher recruitment, teacher education,
promotion, teacher placement, and teacher supervision. The Zonal
Education Officers and Provincial Education Officers should be held
accountable for anything which goes wrong in their education divisions. |