Fitch ratings for Peoples Leasing Trust 32
Fitch Ratings Lanka has affirmed the National rating on the lease
backed trust certificates (LBTCs) issued by Peoples Leasing Co. Ltd.
Trust 32 (PLC32), as follows:
LKR188.4m, LBTC affirmed at 'A-(lka)' (A minus(lka)); Outlook Stable.
The affirmation is based on the uninterrupted payouts made to LBTC
investors during the period under review (December 2007 to August 2008)
and the debt service cover being maintained above the trigger of 1.15.
The affirmation also takes into account the high level of credit
enhancement to investors in the form of excess collateralisation. The
rating of the LBTCs is credit linked to that of the originator, as the
trust enjoys full recourse to the originator in the event that cash
flows from the underlying assets fall short of meeting investor payouts.
However, such recourse has not been utilised to date.
Fitch notes that despite credit enhancement being sufficient to
support a higher rating, structural constraints in the form of unhedged
interest rate risk on the floating rate notes and the absence of a
higher rated pre-defined alternative servicer restricts the rating of
PLC32 to that of the originator.
The absence of minimum quality criteria when replacing assets, lack
of a minimum excess collateralisation trigger to trap excess cash and
the untested nature of bankruptcy proceedings for the mortgaged leases
(as a liquidity facility is not incorporated into the transaction) are
further constraining factors of the rating.
While the transaction documents require the replacement of assets
every quarter, only two such replacements have occurred to date.
Nevertheless, the agency does not view this as a serious concern given
the high level of credit enhancement in the form of excess
collateralisation.
Around 54 percent of the outstanding principal on the notes had been
paid off as at August 2008, reducing the balance of the LBTC principal
to LKR188m.
Excess collateralisation averaged 93 percent for the review period
compared to 32 percent in the previous review period, mainly due to
asset replacements in January 2008, which carried a higher principal
outstanding than the assets removed.
Around 92% of total dues since inception have been collected as at
August 2008. |