Peace Secretariat slams AHRC generalisations
The Peace Secretariat notes with sadness yet another effusion from
the so-called Asian Commission for Human Rights, which asserts that
‘With 52 points, Sri Lanka is South Asia’s worst human rights violator.’
This is yet another example of a game that has now become
fashionable, to develop lists which show how bad particular countries
are, the Peace Secretariat Chief Prof. Rajiv Wijesinghe said yesterday.
Sri Lanka has figured prominently on such lists recently, though it
is interesting that it seems to depend on the whim of the list maker how
many years are taken into consideration in making the list.
“This does not mean that Sri Lanka does not have problems with regard
to the protection of Human Rights. These are exacerbated by the
difficulties of dealing with a particularly ruthless and insidious
terrorist outfit, but that does not make it any less important to reduce
them.
That is why we engage with institutions that can assist us, that is
why we have set up Task Forces on the subject, that is why we try to
clarify and deal with particular situations.
For this reason, we have no quarrel with AHRC when it draws attention
to particular cases, it is then the duty of officials to investigate
these and take remedial action as possible,” the SCOPP Chief added.
What is objectionable is blanket generalizations, and these
interminable lists. Sadly too there is confusion which takes attention
away from the real problems. For instance AHRC renews the canard about
indiscriminate attacks on civilians.
If it is talking about problems with regard to abductions, or attacks
on journalists, it has a point, but here it suggests that these attacks
occur in the course of military operations (a canard first spread by HRW),
and that is just plain false, as any analysis of the operations of our
forces will show.
Their record is excellent, not only in comparison with that of other
forces engaged in struggles against terrorism, but in absolute terms
too, and we can challenge anyone to provide any evidence to the
contrary.
“AHRC’s extrapolations are quite extraordinary in their fraudulence.
They are said to claim that an entire ethnic group is excluded from the
nation’s capital, obviously not knowing that minorities constitute over
half the population of the capital, and that security checks are of
those travelling to Colombo.
Given the number of incidents of terrorist attacks, it is
understandable that those unable to give good reasons for their presence
are checked carefully, and in any case the Supreme Court ruling when
this was not done appropriately makes clear that there is recourse to
judicial review when obvious violations of rights occur.”
|