The human element of Global Warming
Prof. S. Antony Norbert
Global warming is an observed increase in the average temperature of
the Earth’s atmosphere and oceans. Part of this increase may be due to
natural processes, and would have occurred independently of human
activity.
The remainder is due to a human-induced intensification of the
greenhouse effect. The increased volumes of carbon dioxide and other
greenhouse gases released by the burning of fossil fuels, land clearing
and agriculture, and other human activities, are the primary sources of
human-induced warming.
A change in the greenhouse gas content of the atmosphere will affect
the amount of energy stored in the atmosphere. For example, if the
amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere is increased, more heat will
be trapped in the atmosphere. This enhanced greenhouse effect raises the
Earth’s surface temperature.
Mankind through the burning of fossil fuels for energy and
transportation, and changing land use, has produced a substantial change
in the atmospheric composition over most recent centuries, and it is
feared that this continuing change will effect on climate change.
Since the beginning of the industrial revolution, atmospheric
concentrations of carbon dioxide have increased by nearly 30 per cent,
methane concentrations have more
than doubled, and nitrous oxide
concentrations have risen by about 15 per cent.
These increases have enhanced the heat-trapping capability of the
earth’s atmosphere.
In recent times, scientists have become interested in global warming,
due to human’s impact on the climate system, through the enhancement of
the natural greenhouse effect. Globally, the average surface temperature
has increased by about 0.6øC during the last 100 years.
The rise in sea level would be 2-4 cm per decade due to thermal
expasion of ocean waters and melting ice caps and glaciers. Whole areas
of low-lying coastal and estuarine environments will get flooded and
many islands would become totally submerged, example; Maldive Islands.
Global warming has sparked a new refugee crisis and it is a threat to
food security for millions of people worldwide. It could significantly
reduce the production of several key food crops grown in North America,
such as corn, wheat, and potatoes. Many scientists think that such rapid
warming in these ice-covered parts of the world is a consequence of the
ice-albedo feedback effect.
Ice, being white, reflects a significant amount of sunlight and keeps
the surface colder for longer. Highly reflective surfaces like ice have
high albedos. As the enhanced greenhouse effect warms the surface of the
Earth, some of the ice at high latitudes melts, exposing either bare
ground or ocean, both of which have lower albedos than ice.
With a lower albedo, the exposed surfaces reflect less sunlight, with
more sunlight being absorbed. This causes a further rise in surface
temperature, and in turn a further melting of ice.
Here, the climatic response to primary greenhouse heating acts as a
secondary climate forcing that augments the initial climate change. In
the polar regions however, regional warming has been considerably
greater. In some parts of Antarctica and northern Russia, temperatures
have increased by about 2øC within only 50 years.
The Arctic is warming faster than the rest of the globe because water
or bare earth, once uncovered, soak up more heat than ice or snow. In
the Arctic region Inuit communities are at risk due to melting of ice
sheets.
For Inuit communities, ice and snow are intrinsic to physical and
cultural survival. Even their building of igloos is under threat. Inuit
communities live in the United States, Canada, Russia and Greenland.
The total population of Inuit people is about 155,000 and inhabiting
small enclaves in the coastal areas of Greenland, Arctic, North America
(including Canada and Alaska), and extreme northeastern Siberia
(Greenland and Russia). The name Inuit means “the people.” In 1977 the
Inuit Circumpolar Conference, held in Barrow, Alaska, officially adopted
Inuit as the replacement for the term “Eskimo.”
In Alaska the term “Eskimo” is still commonly used. The ancestors of
present-day Inuit, probably traveled from Eurasia eastwards across
northern Canada to Greenland.
These indigenous people live in one of the most inhospitable regions
of the world. Their land consists of low, flat, treeless plains with
permanently frozen ground (permafrost). Although some groups are settled
on rivers and depend primarily on fishing for subsistence, others follow
inland caribou herds.
Most of these people have lived primarily as hunters of maritime
mammals (seals, walrus, and whales), and their culture has always been
oriented to the sea for food and materials for clothing, shelter, and
weaponry.
Current census data list 40,000 Inuit in Alaska; 30,000 in Canada;
40,000 in Greenland; and approximately 1,000 in Siberia. In the Arctic
regions of Canada and the United States, warmer temperatures are melting
the ice and snow that have formed the basis of culture and survival for
millennia.
Many Inuit live in more conventional buildings, which are constructed
mainly to keep the cold out. Unfortunately, with longer and warmer
summers with 24-hour-a-day sunlight, this has turned into very hot.
Since the glaciers are melting quickly, hunters are unable to use
glaciers to cross safely. Now it is so unsafe and have become torrent
rivers. As a result of that, sometimes, they have had a drowning as
well.
There are lots of anxieties and angers that are being felt by some of
the hunters that no longer they can go and hunt. They could see the
change, but they can’t explain why it is changing. Global warming has
particular impacts on indigenous peoples throughout the hemisphere.
Therefore, the relationship between human rights and global warming
must be evaluated in the context of indigenous rights. Because
indigenous people’s traditional lands and natural resources are
essential to their physical and cultural survival.
The right to use and enjoy property is the right which is guaranteed
in the American Declaration and American Convention, as well as in
numerous other international instruments. The right to property
guarantees the use of those lands to which indigenous peoples have
historically had access for their traditional activities and livelihood.
Inter-American Commission on Human Rights and American Court recognised
this right.
The right to life, physical integrity and security is the most
fundamental right that is guaranteed in all major American and
international human rights agreements. As global warming interferes with
the ability of people to hunt, gather, or engage in subsistence farming
on their lands, it undermines their right to a means of subsistence and
their right to life. The use and enjoyment of the land and its resources
are integral components of the physical and cultural survival of the
indigenous communities.
Global warming is destroying lands and ecosystems of the indigenous
cultures. Inuit hunters are falling through the ice to their death as a
result of the thinner ice in the Arctic. These poor and indigenous
communities now have limited ability to turn to other sources for their
needs.
If action is not taken immediately worldwide, to reduce carbon
emissions, the consequences could be catastrophic. It is about humanity.
It is about the right to protection from the destruction of people’s
homelands, property, and livelihoods. It is about the basic human right
to physical integrity. In other words, global warming is a human rights
issue.
The U.S. is the world’s top polluter. Too little is done to limit
emissions of carbon dioxide from factories, cars and power plants. U.N.
studies forecast that global warming could bring more extreme weather
conditions with disastrous droughts, floods and storms.
It could also melt icecaps and increase sea levels, swamping coastal
areas and low-lying islands.
Giving due consideration to the plight and deteoriating living
conditions of inuit people as a result of global warming, Nobel Peace
nominee Sheila Watt-Cloutier has pushed this matter to the
Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (Organization of American
States).
The Inter-American Commission on Human Rights has agreed to look into
this matter and set a date for hearing on global Warming. The hearing
was scheduled for March 1, 2007.
As for environmental activists this decision of the commission itself
is a victory. The environmental organizations have outlined the serious
threat of global warming that is already having on human rights in the
Arctic and throughout the hemisphere. They outlined the impacts on the
people of the Arctic as follows:
Because of the loss of ice and snow, communities have become isolated
from one another; hunting, travel and other subsistence activities have
become more dangerous or impossible; drinking water sources have been
jeopardized; many coastal communities are already threatened or being
forced to relocate, while others face increasing risks or costs; and
transmission of Inuit culture to younger generations has become
difficult or impossible.
These impacts jeopardize the realization of the Inuit’s rights to
culture, life, health, physical integrity and security, property, and
subsistence.
There can be no question that global warming is a serious threat to
human rights in the Arctic and around the world. These fast-moving
adaptations come as a surprise even to biologists and ecologists because
they are occurring so rapidly. It is also reported that between 100 and
200 other cold-dependent animal species, such as penguins and polar
bears are in deep trouble.
Indigenous peoples in the Arctic are the product of the physical
environment in which they live. The culture, economy and identity of
indigenous people depend upon the ice and snow. Climate change now
threatens these people’s human rights to culture, life, personal
security, health, housing, and food.
In the light of these principles, States have an international
obligation to address their role on global warming, either through their
own activities or by the activities of private actors within their
jurisdiction.
In the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change, 190 nations have
recognised the need for coordinated effort and established a regime for
doing so. But simply participating in that regime is not necessarily
sufficient to prevent human rights violations related to global warming.
States must work to ensure that the international system is strong
enough to fully protect human rights. If they are unable to do so
through global collaboration, they must take necessary steps to avoid
contributing to human rights violations under their jurisdiction.
Because of the loss of ice and snow, communities have become isolated
from one another. Hunting, travelling and other subsistence activities
have become more dangerous or impossible.
Drinking water sources have been jeopardized. In addition, many
coastal communities are already threatened of or being forced to
relocate and transmission of Inuit culture to younger generations has
become difficult or impossible.
These impacts jeopardize the realization of the Inuit’s rights to
culture, life, health, physical integrity and security, property, and
subsistence.
The writer is Professor of Geography, University of Colombo |