Chilcott summoned to Foreign Ministry to register displeasure at
comments
British High Commissioner Dominic Chilcott was summoned last morning
to the Foreign Ministry to express the Government’s displeasure at some
comments made by him at a recent public gathering.
At last morning’s meeting Foreign Secretary Dr. Palitha Kohana drew
attention to the High Commissioner’s comment: “I am not saying that the
political aspiration for Eelam is illegitimate,” and expressed the
Government’s deep concern.
Dr. Kohona stated that this statement was of particular concern to
the Government given the British Government’s categorical rejection of
the creation of a separate State in Sri Lanka.
Additionally, at a time when the painstaking process of evolving a
negotiated political settlement was under way, such sentiments would
have a negative impact and send confusing signals. He also expressed
disappointment that such statement was made at a particularly
politically sensitive time in the country.
The British High Commissioner categorically confirmed that UK does
not support in any way the establishment of a separate State in Sri
Lanka, neither did he personally. The British High Commissioner by way
of explanation stated that what he meant was that political aspirations
could be expressed through legitimate methods, just as much as the
aspirations of independence for Yorkshire.
The Foreign Secretary also stated that there was no substantiation of
the allegation made that relatives of TNA members had been abducted.
The law enforcement authorities had advised that preliminary
investigation had not revealed any basis for these allegations which
seemed to follow a familiar pattern. Upholding the rule of law was among
the Government’s foremost priorities, he said.
Such allegations have the potential to be used and manipulated by
interested parties in the current political situation.
The High Commissioner agreed that the Government had the right to
take measures within the law to confront the terrorist threat posed by
the LTTE.
He said he was impressed with the ready acceptance of the supremacy
of the legal process evidenced by the deference demonstrated by the law
enforcement authorities to the recent rulings of the Supreme Court.
He also stated that political opposition unit be consistent with the
legal framework of the country. |