Internationalisation of School Education
Dr. Siri Gamage
Continued from August 30
Further changes in the global and local environments occurred during
the 1980s and 1990s.
These included the ethnic conflict, resistance by the radical
Sinhalese party JVP, economic liberalization, privatization of state
enterprises, globalisation, relaxation of emigration restrictions and
encouragement of overseas employment, and expansion of private
educational services offered by international organizations and/or their
local counterparts.
As a result of the expansion of private educational services a view
exists that the country is going back to the system which existed during
the British colonial period (1796-1948) where a few could afford to pay
the fees to attend elite schools , and a majority were excluded from
access to high quality education provided by such schools.
In our country's educational system the education system that the
English gave us during their rule, the Christian missionary schools, and
the free education system initiated by Mr. Kannangara still exists in an
unequal manner. The mixture of these different educational systems and
patterns has contributed to make our society unequal.
To make things more complicated, along with the liberalized economy
the newly introduced international school system and private education
system, foreign education etc., is turning the social system upside
down.
In fact the inequalities in education influenced the 1971 rebellion
and 1988-89 (youth) unrest. (Hewage A.S. 1999: 7-8) In the next section,
I briefly look at the educational scene that existed before and after
the independence and the issues identified by educationists and other
commentators.
From Colonial to Free Education - A Brief Account of the Changes &
Inequalities According to Jayasuriya (1969), two dualities existed in
the organization of the education system during the colonial period
(1796-1948).
1. schools managed by the government and those managed by
denominational bodies and private individuals, 2. schools under all
management, divided along linguistic lines ie. according to the extent
to which English or other local languages were used.
This created various inequities eg. money provided, quantity and
quality of educational facilities, opportunities for higher education
and employment. Jayasuriya states that the missionary education was
encouraged and supported by the government while the traditional
Buddhist, Hindu and Muslim schools were deprived of such support and
encouragement. Government heavily subsidized education in English medium
schools.
'The differential opportunities associated with the language medium,
for higher education as well as for employment, added to the inequity of
the system' (Jayasuriya 1969: 6).
Curricula
In 1939, there were 3575 schools in Ceylon. Out of this, only 35 were
prestigious schools. One of them was a government school established in
1836, and others were Christian missionary schools. The curriculum in
these schools inculcated Christian and English ideals in the young
people and prepared them for employment in government and commercial
establishments.
The decision to conduct the Cambridge Senior examination and the
London Matriculation examination in Ceylon and to prepare students in
the prestigious Ceylon schools for thee examinations contributed to the
legitimacy of this curriculum. They were examinations popularly taken by
English Public School students.
They emphasized literacy and academic skills, the requirements
necessary for the university studies in Britain (Jayasuriya 1969: 7).
Commenting further on the rest of schools in the country Jayasuriya
states, The mass of schools for the most part set their sights on the
curriculum of the prestigious schools, but their resources were so
limited as to permit its adoption only in a greatly adulterated form
that provided no intellectual stimulation at all while being at the same
time socially irrelevant.
The seal was thus set on the separation of education from life, and
the only saving grace was that the basic literacy which the curriculum
provided was of some value. A few from among these ranks emerged as a
Sinhalese educated or a Tamil educated elite, socially inferior to the
English educated elite and with fewer opportunities for economic
mobility, generally holding appointments as Sinhalese and Tamil
teachers, or practising Eastern systems of medicine. (Jayasuriya 1969:
8).
There was much unhappiness and frustration about this situation among
the masses in the 19th and early 20th century resulting in significant
changes to the system. Silva puts this in following words: By the early
twentieth century the society of Sri Lanka was a complex one: being
composed of various religious and ethnic groups-Buddhists, Christians
(of various denominations), Hindus and Muslims as well as the Sinhalese,
Tamils, Moors, Malays and Burghers. A key factor here was that the
largest ethno-religious group, the Sinhala Buddhists, found themselves
in the early twentieth century as an educationally underprivileged
group.
The situation could not last very long especially as the introduction
of universal suffrage in 1931 and the winning of independence by the
mid-century placed them in a politically dominant position.
In fact one of the themes of the history of education in Sri Lanka in
the present century is the successful attempt of the Sinhala -Buddhist
leaders to change the educational structure of the country so that their
group would have at least equal opportunities with those of other
religious and ethnic groups. (Silva 1979: 475)
There were significant changes to the system of educational
organization, as well as the curriculum after Sri Lanka gained
independence from Britain. However, the continuation of certain elements
of the prestigious school system, its values and norms, and the process
of elite formation dividing the emerging generations of Sri Lankans into
two broad strata is also a distinguishing feature of this period, i.e.
Anglicized vs. vernacular educated.
After centuries of colonial administration where certain segments of
the society who could afford their children's western-oriented
education, and the growing frustrations of those segments who missed
out, free education was seen as a victory when it became government
policy in around the time of independence in 1948.
Both at the school and university level, through various policy
changes including affirmative action measures, large numbers of children
from rural areas, lower classes and caste groups were able to access
publicly funded educational institutions.
Many of them in fact achieved considerable social mobility by
securing academic qualifications from these institutions and full
employment mainly in the state sector.
They became a powerful force in Sri Lankan politics, economy,
bureaucracy, academia, security forces and other sectors often in
leadership roles. Universities were transformed from elitist to a mass
level.
Changes
However, along with these changes which were more evident and visible
in the 1970s, the quality and standards of education started to suffer
and decline. Questions about the usefulness of the kind of education
received (eg. knowledge, capabilities and skills) started to occupy the
minds of those who witnessed the trend eg. business leaders in the
private sector.
Recognition of qualifications obtained from the public education
system became problematic, especially when it came to employment of new
graduates in the private sector that started to enter a new phase in its
evolution since late 70s.
There was politicization of the education system through
interferences in key appointments. Under these circumstances, the
meaning and utility of free education to the masses started to change.
Many school going children started to attend fee-charging private
tuition classes during and outside school hours, adding to, and
highlighting the woes of the public education system. Free public
education doesn't hold the same promise to the children that it once
held after the reforms effected around the time of independence to
various segments of society that look to the government for the
provision of quality education leading to better employment prospects.
Commenting on the situation, two social scientists stated, In this
age of the post-welfare state, reform is long overdue in a system of
education which has already rendered itself obsolete and of no
particular use to its recipients either in terms of employment or
personal development.
If the existing system of school and university education were to
continue for the sake of preserving the concept of free education, its
immediate victims would be the vast masses of persons of lower and
middle class backgrounds, whose children are destined to receive a
low-quality, sub-standard and goal-less education through the public
education system.
The historical period in which free education served the social
interests of the Sri Lankan masses has effectively come to an end. What
remains, with power to grip the emotions and more people and students on
to the streets, is the mythology of free education. (Abeysekera and
Uyangoda 1997)
This shows how certain institutions and practices established in one
historical context can become irrelevant in another, but the populace
who use the services offered by such institutions continue to use them
almost out of necessity but also due to the powerful ideologies and
mythologies surrounding such practices. Ideologies and mythologies
continue even after the use by dates of corresponding services has
passed.
However, not all the people follow such mythologies. Many academics
and business executives, parents-especially those from urbanized and
higher social classes do understand the situation and look to
alternatives beyond the public education system, and the fee-charging
tuition classes run by local teachers.
In this situation, the introduction and expansion of international
schools along with the economic liberalization policies of the
centre-right government of 1977 was seen by some parents as a blessing
in disguise as they provided a better education with better English
language training and future job prospects.
The changing economic policies from the late 1970s opened up the
private sector in the economy to international players. The economy and
employment base started to expand. State, unlike before, couldn't fulfil
its traditional role as the provider of employment. Yet, the larger
population did not understand this.
They continue to see free education as a right - although many who go
through it are led to a dead end. On the other hand, notwithstanding the
costs involved in paying tuition and other fees, significant numbers of
children started to access international educational institutions at
school and university levels.
In this respect, two factors are important: 1. Ability of the public
education system at school and university levels to absorb those who
wish to obtain education. 'At the higher education level, Sri Lanka has
the lowest participation rates in Asia, less than 3 percent of the age
group, versus the Asian average of 8 percent' (The World Bank Report
1996: 2).
2. Opportunities available to those who cannot or do not wish to
continue in the public system eg. Drop outs at various points eg.
Ordinary level examinations (O/L), advance level examinations (A/L).
It is believed that a significant number of those who enter the
private/international systems of education are those who don't continue
in the public system for a variety of reasons including the quality, and
the recognition accorded to the qualifications in the society at large.
Asian Tribune
To be continued |