Sanvada on new legislation on micro finance
COLOMBO: The Pathfinder Foundation, supported by the Sri Lanka
Business Development Centre, organised a Sanvadaya (a discussion) on the
proposed legislation on micro finance on April 27 at the Sri Lanka
Foundation Institute, Colombo.
Over 75 participants representing a wide cross-section of
stakeholders, practitioners, borrowers, consultants, trainers, donors,
regulators and auditors from the micro finance sector participated.
Dr. M. U. A. Tennekoon, Additional Managing Director of the National
Development Trust Fund, moderated the discussion with great skill. A
critique of the draft legislation was provided by Dr. S. Premaratne of
the Colombo University, Dr. Hassan of BRAC, Sri Lanka and Dr. David
Bartocha of the GTZ presented an overview of similar legislation in
Bangladesh and Cambodia which was very useful for comparative purposes.
The presentations were followed by a lively discussion.
The participants in principle welcomed the new legislation, since it
would legitimise the sector, which in some cases, was operating in a
legal lacuna.
However, it was pointed out that over 90% of the players in the
sector were operating under and in terms of enabling legislation such
as, the Companies Law, Co-operative Law , the Voluntary Organisations
Law and the Samurdhi Law. Was it really necessary to create a whole
infrastructure under the Central Bank to make up the balance 10 %?
Wouldn't it be more economical to strengthen the regulatory capacity
of those institutions, already existing ? It was also mentioned that the
Samurdhi Act had provisions which limited Central Bank supervision.
It was suggested that a clear distinction be made in the law on micro
finance institutions (MFI) which mobilise members / non members' savings
and others for purposes of supervision. The potential cost of
supervision as proposed in the draft law could cause financial problems
to small MFIs. Regulation of interest rates, would have a serious
negative effect, as this is not an area in which interest rates can be
fixed by the Central Bank circulars.
Restrictions on, area of operation, opening and closing of branches
which the Central Bank implements regarding Commercial Banks and Finance
Companies, if applied to MFIs, would place great burdens on the MFIs.
Regarding the appointment of agents of the Central Bank to undertake
regulatory functions, at the divisional level, there should be some
criteria indicated in the act itself, which indicates the basis on which
such a person has to be selected, otherwise this could lead to
politicisation of the supervision. Similarly giving this role to the
Divisional Secretary also would result in politicisation and this should
be reconsidered.
The general view was that micro finance in Sri Lanka is still an
emerging and developing sector, which has grown exponentially, in the
recent past, under a legal regime, which can be described as "benign
neglect ".
The need for an accounting standard for MFIs and auditing firms
capacity in this area being strengthened was also highlighted. The
participants were highly appreciative of the presence and positive
interventions by the senior Central Bankers from relevant divisions.
The Pathfinder Foundation is reported to have planned similar
programmes on other pending legislations. |