The problem of Shakespeare splitting Henry IV into two parts
Gwen Herat
At the Complete Works Festival in Stratford - upon - Avon
DRAMA: Historically, Henry IV is only 37 years old but in the
play he seems nearly twice his age though there is no reason to present
him as a glum royal. Historically, Henry IV died in 1413. Henry IV is
Falstaff’s play as the knight who was not only witty in himself but the
reason of wit in others.
SCENE: William Houseton as the youthful newly crowned King Henry V
(Prince Harry) refuses to acknowledge the two timing Sir Falstaff
played by Desmond Barrit in the Royal Shakespeare Company’s version
of the play.
|
Forever popular, this sequel to the events described in Richard 11
probably was written and first performed in 1596. Shakespeare’s sources
could have been drawn from The First Two Books of the Civil Wars written
by Holinshed and Samuel Daniels which would have provided him with his
character of the youthful Prince Hal which was brilliantly portrayed by
Richard Burton in 1951 mounted by the Shakespeare Memorial Theatre.
In Henry IV Part Two, Shakespeare creates a more complexed though
still at times extremely funny atmosphere, than the more effective one
of the predecessor. It is thought to have been started around 1597 but
interrupted for the Bard to create The Merry Wives of Windsor. It may
have been completed and first performed in 1598.
In Henry IV, Northumberland is informed with the false news that the
rebels have been triumphant at Shrewsbury and that the king has been
fatally wounded and that Hotspur has killed Prince Hal.
But the version is contradicted by the servant, Traverse who has
heard the real truth. As the rebels continue to assess their strategic
chances of survival, Mistress Quickly has Falstaff arrested for breach
of promise.
A series of funny scenes ensue against the background of an ill king.
After forging ill health and being indisposed almost at death’s call to
test his son’s loyalty who in the meantime has crowned himself as king,
Henry wakes up from his slumber. Prince Harry convinces his father that
he did not snatch the crown but it was the circumstances that made him
do so. Henry believes him and the royal father and his son are
reconciled.
However, the king dies shortly afterwards and the Prince inherits the
crown, prompting Falstaff to believe in false importance that his past
friendship with the young king will lead to a life of prosperity.
He was to be disappointed because contrary to his expectations, the
king refuses to recognise the fat knight and also threaten to get him
executed if he is found within a range of ten miles from him. Falstaff
in ignorance deludes himself that this was a king’s threat made only for
public consumption.
He believed the king would see him later, privately. Falstaff’s
delusion dies when the Lord Chief Justice returns and orders Falstaff
and his followers to be imprisoned.
There is a rumour that King Henry is planning to mount a military
campaign in France and the play ends with an epilogue. There are other
rumours too that Falstaff may escape from prison and join Princess
Catherine and the armed forces but die of perspiration.
This is one lighter sequel among many that Shakespeare reserved for
the end of the play in order to add a little humour.
I for one, is still at a loss to understand why Shakespeare had to
divide Henry into two parts when the whole story could have been
contained in one play. Especially there is not much of a story in Part
II. In fact, no significant story at all except to surface the double
standards of Sir Falstaff.
The chief character, Henry plays but small but significant role just
like Julius Caeser in Ceasar. For the Complete Works Festival, Henry IV
- Part Two is performed by Chicago Shakespeare theatre and directed by
Barbara Gaines who also directed Part One two years ago for the same
Company. Part One was also mounted by the Royal Shakespeare Company in
the year 2000.
Most of the characters found in both plays are historically correct
though Shakespeare at times deviated to accommodate characters of his
choice to fill the gaps but the Bard was careful not to overlap history
and open himself to debate. Shakespeare emerges brilliantly in Act IV
when he uses Henry to urge his son towards his dream;
Henry - Lest’s rest and lying still might make them look back
Too near unto my State, Therefore, my Harry;
Be it thy course to busy giddy minds
With foreign quarrels , that action, hence borne out
May write the memory of the former days.
Would more I; but my lungs are wasted too
That strength of speech is utterly denied me.
How I came by to throne, O God forgive
And grant it may with thee in true peace live.
Prince - ‘My gracious liege
You won it; wore it; kept it; and gave it to me....
Act IV Scene. V
At the Complete Works Festival, dialogue played a major role.
Eloquently delivered by professionals to boomerang around the halls as
well as on to Henley Street throughout the day, on the same tracks that
Shakespeare trodded in life. People are reminded of that very special
Shakespearean language that lingers in brilliance on English Literature. |