The UN, poverty and religious strife
by Lynn Ockersz
Sixty years after its founding the UN remains a vibrant, multilateral
forum for the achievement of mankind's undying dream of a united,
peaceful world. This is borne out by not only the substantial membership
of the UN - now standing at 191 - but by also its continued appeal among
the world's states as a deliberative and conflict - resolution forum.
It was only a few weeks back that world leaders met at the 60th
anniversary sessions of the UN General Assembly and pledged to continue
to work towards the now well known UN Millennium Development Goals (MDGs)
which, however, are remaining distant targets for a considerable number
of states.
Nevertheless, this epochal agenda of the UN remains a rallying -
point for the membership of the UN and the continued adherence by the
bulk of the UN membership to the vision and objectives of the UN proves
the continuous relevance and importance of the world body.
All this is despite the tendency on the part of some major powers to
act unilaterally in the pursuit of individual military and political
objectives, seemingly upstaging the UN in the process and almost totally
disregarding its authority and the claims that the world body has on its
members.
Such developments would seem to prove the case of the detractors of
the UN that it has outlived its usefulness and effectiveness but the
fact remains that the world would be in a far sorrier state if not for
the presence of the UN.
We see the truth of this proposition even in the current South Asian
quake catastrophe. Although some of the biggest powers of the world are
yet to register a substantial presence in the quake hit areas, the UN is
already there, stretching itself inexhaustibly in the service of those
affected.
This has been the case in most global emergencies - our own tsunami
disaster being a case in point - although acknowledgement of positive UN
intervention is rather slow in coming. This is perhaps because the UN is
a presence which the world has come to "take for granted".
However, there is no gainsaying that the UN is obliged to prove its
effectiveness in a sustained fashion for the perpetuation of its
credibility. For instance, the UN would need to ensure that palpable and
real progress is being made towards the achievement of the MDGs. This is
on account of the crucial role the alleviation of material hardships and
poverty plays in the establishment of world peace and stability.
Religious strife in some parts of the world, which some commentators
see as a "Clash of Civilizations" and which is also seen as a
contributory factor to global tensions, is traceable to increasing
deprivation and the worsening pauperisation of some sections of the
world community.
Poverty and deprivation fosters identity - based conflicts and
violence because hate-breathing demagogues among these victims of want
point to the religious and ethnic "other" as being responsible for the
material backwardness of their communities.
This is happening in not only the deprived regions of Asia - such as
South and West Asia - but also in North Africa and Egypt. As is known,
religious strife has broken out in Egypt, reportedly pitting Muslims
against Coptic Christians over blasphemy allegations.
Likewise, communal tensions among Arab "nations" are compounding
Iraq's problems. Hopefully, an Arab League initiative to bring
reconciliation among Iraq's ethnic and religious groups would succeed,
but it is clear that lack of political power and inequitable
distribution of national resources are playing a significant role in
keeping Iraq on the boil, although the US military presence in the
country is proving a great divider and a cause of unrelenting conflict.
All this calls for a continued, proactive involvement of the UN in
the world's hot spots which are also the most deprived regions of the
globe. Economic globalization has proved a divider and not an equaliser
and this has aggravated poverty and underdevelopment. More so why, the
UN should ensure that its MDGs are achieved within a specific time
frame. |