Proposals for Constitutional Reforms:
SLIP SHOWS: No Bill of Rights in UNP ‘Constitution’
Lakshman I.Keerthisinghe LLB, LLM.MPhil,
Attorney-at-Law
It becomes not a law-maker to become a
law-breaker. Bias 6c BC – one of the Seven Sages of Greece
In recent times the United National Party (UNP) led by Ranil
Wickremesinghe and the National Movement for Social Justice (NMSL) led
by Ven.Maduluwave Sobhitha Thera have put forward proposals for the
reformation of the content of protection of fundamental rights in Sri
Lanka in addition to other reforms in drafting a new constitution for
Sri Lanka. In the meantime the Office of the Special Envoy on Human
Rights Minister Mahinda Samarasinghe has put forward the National Action
Plan for the Protection and Promotion of Human Rights 2011-2016 the full
text of which is available at http.wwwhractionplan.gov.lk .
Dr. Jayampathy Wicktemaratne PC Expert in Constitutional Law has
given his views about the UNP Proposals on Constitutional Reform in an
article published in a web publication.
This piece attempts to summarize the different views expressed on
this matter in order to obtain a better understanding of the proposals
put forward and the remedial action proposed by the Government of Sri
Lanka in this regard.
Dr. Wickremaratne speaking of the UNP Proposals questions as to the
reason for the UNP to concentrate only on three rights which are (a)
universal access to education,(b) the right of persons belonging to a
religious or ethnic community to enjoy the culture, practice and their
religions and use their language, (c)Right to Good Administration. Has
the UNP forgotten the Right to Life questions Dr.Wickremaratne.
Civil and political rights
Minister Mahinda Samarasinghe |
While the global trend is to widen the scope of civil and political
rights and to recognize social, economic and cultural rights as well as
women and children’s rights the only new right mentioned in the UNP
Proposal is the right to information.
The UNP Proposal has included; facilities for good health,
opportunities for employment, access to education, protection of family
rights, children and women rights, rights of senior citizens and
disabled persons to be declared under Directive Principles of State
Policy which remain unenforceable.
The Proposals by NMSL led by Ven.Maduluwave Sobhitha Thera speaks of
a new fundamental rights chapter stating that the Bill of Rights
mentioned in the National Human Rights Action Plan is a good basis for a
new fundamental rights chapter. The right to information should be
introduced states the NMSL.
Turning to the Bill of Rights mentioned in the National Human Rights
Action Plan put forward by the Government of Sri Lanka it is apparent
that a large number of comprehensive remedial measures have been
recommended to be implemented according to the said Plan, which are far
superior to the marginal reforms suggested by the UNP.
Human rights violations
The Plan focuses on 18 areas and mentions eight priority areas. The
focus is on measures to give effect to international human rights
obligations, Constitutional rights, accountability in providing remedies
for human rights violations, effective judicial, administrative or
legislative authorities ensuring the right to remedy HR violations,
emergency regulations, derogation protocols, right to life, arrest and
detention, conditions of detention, right to privacy, freedom of
religion, language rights, right to information, freedom of expression,
right to vote and take part in public affairs, discrimination in
general, discrimination of persons with disabilities and access to
justice.
The prioritized areas under the Plan are Civil and political rights,
economic, social and cultural rights, prevention of torture, rights of
women, labour rights, migrant workers, childrens’ rights and internally
displace persons. The action plan is in eight parts representing the
eight thematic prioritized areas and is each in the form of a matrix
consisting of focus area, goal, issues, activities, key performance
indicators, time frame and key responsible agencies designated to effect
the remedial measures.
For instance the Ministry of Justice has been tasked with the
adoption of legislation to ensure right to information and the freedom
of expression. Ministry of National Languages and Social Integration
would ensure the effective implementation of language rights protection.
Access to justice
The Ministry of Justice would take action to submit a Bill to the
Cabinet to implement the right to privacy. Freedom of religion would be
ensured by administrative action assigned to the Ministry of Education.
Access to justice has been allocated to the Ministry of Prison
Reforms and Rehabilitation. On arrest and detention the Ministry of
Justice will take action to amend the existing rules to enhance
administrative procedure to empower magistrates and other law
enforcement agencies to visit places of detention and also amend Section
28(1) of the Human Rights Commission Act to include all arrests and also
require the reporting of arrests to State Counsel in the area. The
action plan consists of 24 pages and only a few salient areas have been
referred to in this piece for want of space.
International law
The Chapter on Fundamental Rights in the present 1978 Constitution
enshrined the rights guaranteed under international law and the
enactment of the International Convention on Civil and Political Rights
Act No.56 of 2007 gave statutory recognition to the international
obligation under that Convention.
In 2008 the Government of Sri Lanka appointed a Committee to give
effect to the proposals contained in the Mahinda Chinthana for a
comprehensive Bill of Rights to be introduced to the Constitution. A
draft bill has been formulated which is presently being deliberated by
stakeholders.
It is disheartening to note that the UNP with several legal
luminaries in its ranks has been unable to draft a suitable
comprehensive chapter on fundamental rights in their new constitutional
reform proposal.
A very prominent member of Parliament who was a vociferous supporter
of free and fair elections recently chaired an election held to appoint
office-bearers in a prominent Association in Sri Lanka where exactly the
opposite to such a noble concept was permitted to take place under his
very scrutiny.
The quotation at the outset of this piece becomes relevant in such
situations.
A comprehensive Bill of Rights is a dire necessity in our
Constitution particularly at a time frivolous allegations of gross human
rights violations are been leveled at Sri Lanka by interested parties of
the diaspora led by the TGTE hell bent to establish a separate state in
the North and East of Sri Lanka and using all possible means to whip up
support for their cause of dividing our motherland into two different
states.
All patriotic and right thinking Sri Lankans should oppose such an
endeavour as even our brethren in the North and East do not contribute
to such a separatist agenda. |