Thatcher: the defining figure of DIVISIVE POLITICS
Margaret Thatcher was a woman of purpose and
achievement, who set the tone of events and forcibly altered the trends
of the time. She grabbed opportunity as it came, and created opportunity
when it was needed. In the words of The Guardian editorial on her
demise: “Whether you were for her or against her, Margaret Thatcher set
the agenda for the past three and a half decades of British politics.
All the debates that matter today in the public arena, whether in
economics, social policy, politics, the law, the national culture or
this country's relations with the rest of the world, still bear
something of the imprint she left on them in her years in office between
1979 and 1990. More than 20 years after her party disposed of her when
she had become an electoral liability, British public life is still
defined to an extraordinary degree by the argument between those who
wish to continue or refine what she started and those who want to
mitigate or turn it back. Just as in life she shaped the past 30 years,
so in death she may well continue to shape the next 30.”
Margaret Thatcher |
“She rode the wind of history with an opportunist's brilliance” is
how The Guardian described Margaret Thatcher’s rise to power in the UK
and how she remained the longest serving Prime Minister of the last
century.
The prototype of divisive politics she defined the trend of British
politics, economics and society, through her time in office, the stamp
of which continues to this day. It is an irony of our times that those
who most mourn her loss, 20 years after being embarrassingly removed
from office, are drawn from the opposing ranks of British politics, that
continues a battle to be distant or at variance from what “Thatcherism”
came to mean in the lexicon of British politics.
She was a woman of purpose and achievement, who set the tone of
events and forcibly altered the trends of the time. She grabbed
opportunity as it came, and created opportunity when it was needed. In
the words of The Guardian editorial on her demise: “Whether you were for
her or against her, Margaret Thatcher set the agenda for the past three
and a half decades of British politics. All the debates that matter
today in the public arena, whether in economics, social policy,
politics, the law, the national culture or this country's relations with
the rest of the world, still bear something of the imprint she left on
them in her years in office between 1979 and 1990. More than 20 years
after her party disposed of her when she had become an electoral
liability, British public life is still defined to an extraordinary
degree by the argument between those who wish to continue or refine what
she started and those who want to mitigate or turn it back. Just as in
life she shaped the past 30 years, so in death she may well continue to
shape the next 30.”
Manipulative politics
She came to her own by defeating Edward Heath for the Conservative
leadership in February 1975 becoming the first woman to lead a major
British political party. Manipulating the politics of her own party,
where she was less popular than other key members, she used the strategy
of winning arguments without making promises, and the continuing
weakness of Labour and the Liberal Democrats to emerge as the
Conservative Prime Minister in May 1979, the first woman to hold this
office in the UK.
Her campaign for leadership saw populist trends that were dangerous,
but useful for her purpose. A clear example was her warning that
Britain's white population feared being "swamped" by immigrants.
Analysts saw this as a comment that earned her contempt from the left,
but to her it was worth valuable working-class votes for the
Conservatives. Her attitudes to immigration, urban deprivation and South
Africa attracted accusations of racism, but she was not moved by such
criticism. She declared the African National Union a terrorist
organization, was not pleased to oppose apartheid, and her attacks on
the Soviet Bloc earned the jibe of “Iron Lady” from the Russians, but
she used the epithet to her own advantage.
What she said on the steps of No. 10 Downing Street no sooner she
took office, “where there is discord, may we bring harmony" was in
complete contrast to what she brought about in office. Harmony was the
aspect least seen in UK society during her time. What she did was to
change the very cornerstones of British society as they stood since the
end of World War 2 – target the welfare state in most aspects, bring
immediate tax reductions to the higher earners, increase VAT to meet the
cost of these concessions for the rich, that seriously affected the
lower income earners.
Her monetarist economic policies saw disregard to rising unemployment
and a sharp fall in industrial output. She was more concerned with the
market, financial services, the need for deflationary budgets, cutting
public borrowing and raising indirect taxes, which affected lower income
earners. This was the background that saw the Brixton riots in April
1981, followed by the Toxteth riot in July the same year and strong
protests in many parts of the country. Through all this she refused to
accept that these disturbances might be linked to rising unemployment.
The situation was such that by end 1981 opinion polls showed her to the
most unpopular Prime Minister since records began. The question in most
minds was whether Labour or the new alliance between Liberals and Social
Democrats would make a dramatic gain in the next election.
The Falklands opportunity
That is when the winds of opportunity came her way, with the
Argentineans occupying the Falkland Islands, which they called the
Malvinas, in April 1982, after she overruled moves to acknowledge
Argentine sovereignty over the Falklands. She went against the advice of
her own Cabinet, and the Foreign Office and Ministry of Defence advice.
She saw here the chance to demonstrate that she was indeed the “Iron
Lady”, and dispatched a Task Force to the South Atlantic to regain the
Falklands, even rejecting her close ally Washinghton’s suggestion for
negotiations.
It was a short war, and there are many questions that remain to be
answered about the strategy and tactics of the British to this day. But
the victory for the British troops was the clear rising star in her
political life, with her image growing both in the UK and elsewhere in
the world. The success of the war saw her begin a long election campaign
with a victory tour of the Falklands. The victory that followed was
stunning in all aspects. Divisions between Labour and the SPD saw the
Conservatives win with a majority of 144.
She had to soon face grim economic reality with unemployment and
mortgage rates rising. It is in this background that she made her major
attacks on trade unions and loss making state institutions - the key
aspects of “Thatcherism”. Here begins the real legacy of Margaret
Thatcher. It was the time of another Battle of Britain – when all lines
were drawn against the coal miners, and every strategy, open and covert,
was used to weaken the unions, even encouraging individual miners to
take legal action against the NUM President Arthur Scargill for refusal
to hold a strike ballot. The miners strike ended in the worst defeat for
the unions, and led to major changes in the coal sector with the closure
of mines, and new laws that controlled trade unions. The Iron Lady was
at work, and the welfare state, was targeted, with privatization of
major assets carried out with speed and the entire structure of the
British economy and society changed.
Decline and fall
Her negotiating style was mainly one of no compromise. This was seen
in her dealings with the European Union, when she was tough in getting
most of the concessions that the UK wanted from the EU without joining
the Euro.
But she also was a keen supporter of the expansion of the European
Union that saw the new nations that came out of the Soviet Bloc join it.
She was decidedly against the Soviet Union, and the so-called Communist
system that prevailed under the leadership of Moscow at the time. She
was the first to spot in Mikhail Gorbachev a likely future partner in
international affairs, in a new political order, and urged her closest
ally Ronald Reagan to take to Gorbachev, which changed the pattern of
world politics.
Her inflexibility was also evident in handling the Northern Ireland
issue, and allowed Bobby Sands and nine other hunger strikers to starve
themselves to death in 1981, and was hardly moved by the near fatal IRA
bomb attack on Brighton’s Grand Hotel during the 1984 Conservative
Conference, in a bid to assassinate her. Her unwavering ways saw many
clashes within her Cabinet, and increased disagreements on policy saw
the beginning of her downfall. There were many internal clashes within
the Conservative Party. A key mistake in policy that would see her go
down was the idea of abolishing rates – leading to what was called the
community charge or poll tax. As The Guardian describes it: “The
community charge or poll tax…saw her name indissolubly linked to a
policy that caused riots on the streets, and was rightly seen as a
flagrant breach of the principle that taxes should not fall equally on
the rich and the poor.”
Her downfall was swift with a by-election defeat for the
Conservatives in July 1990, the increased internal challenges to her
with the resignation of Chancellor Sir Geoffrey Howe in November that
year. In what was unquestionably an open call or her removal from office
when Howe said: "The time has come for others to consider their own
response to the tragic conflict of loyalties with which I have myself
wrestled for perhaps too long". Just one day later Michael Heseltine
announced he was challenging her for the party leadership.
This was a shock she never expected, and within days the advice of
many of her loyalists was that she should stand down. She announced her
resignation on the morning of November 22, 1990, ending a premiership
that lasted 11 years and six months, and on November 28, John Major won
the second round in the leadership contest of the Tories.She did not
take her defeat easily. She did not seem able to come to terms with the
fall she had. She saw the Conservative Party go into defeat after two
terms of John Major and Labour come back under Tony Blair. But Labour’s
return was with a greatly changed policy, much closer to her own
thinking than the older Labour that she first defeated, and without the
commitment to the Welfare State that was its key policy line from the
days of Clement Attlee, in 1945. She left the House of Commons in 1992,
and entered the House of Lords as Baroness Thatcher the same year. She
saw the Tories struggle in defeat under successive leaders, noting it
with vengeance, but grew weaker in body and mind. But this woman who
defined the trends of politics in the UK and abroad in her days in
office will continue to dominate the politics of the UK for many more
years – as we see David Cameron trying to live up to an image he could
never match, and also try to distance himself from all the negatives of
“Thatcherism”, while Labour struggles to get over Tony Blair, who was
more of a Thatcherite than any Tory of today would ever be.
There are many who see the crises faced by Britain today as being
caused by the Thatcherite policies of overarching belief in the market,
and the importance given to the service sector than to industry. The UK
suffers the consequences today of not having the industrial strength it
once had. The country is in the midst of a raging debate on social
security – unemployment keeps rising, pensioners suffer and the old are
losing the benefits of welfare. The UK is now in the midst of a third
great economic crisis since World War 2. The monetary policies that
attracted Margaret Thatcher are now being blamed on the financial crisis
in the West, and David Cameron struggles to make a new definition of the
UK’s position vis-à-vis Europe, without the opportunities that Thatcher
had in her day. There is also the nagging question of the sinking of the
Argentine warship ARA General Belgrano, killing 700 Argentine naval
personnel, when it was outside the military exclusion zone earmarked in
the battle in the Falklands War. The question of this being a major War
Crime by the UK remains an issue that calls for resolution. It is clear
that Margaret Thatcher and the most divisive politics that she brought
to Britain will be in focus for decades to come. |