Art of negotiation
Premasara Epasinghe
(BA (Cey), Dip in Ed, Dip in Mkt, Lecturer in Management and
Marketing, Public Relations and Mktg Consultant -
Negotiation is a key word in the Business World. In Latin, I presume
the word Negotium-Negotiari – means business.
There are generally a number of definitions to the word Negotiation.
A simple definition on Negotiation is “It is a discussion aimed at
reaching an agreement”. The term Negotiable means, something can be
modified after discussion. In the case of a cheque, the word, Negotiable
means that can be converted into cash or transferred to another person.
When, we use the term Negotiate, it means, try to reach an agreement by
discussion to arrange (an affair) or bring about a (result). To get or
give the value of the money for a cheque or bond can also be called a
negotiation. Sometimes, even when you are driving your car, you must be
really careful in Negotiating a bend.
In “Business Jargon” - Negotiation is the process, where interested
parties resolve disputes, agree upon course of action, bargain for
individual or collective advantage and or attempt to craft outcomes
which serve their mutual interest.
Negotiation is generally considered as a form of alternative dispute
resolution. First and foremost, one must see whether the situation needs
a negotiation.
Let us discuss the essential qualities of negotiation
There should be two parties who share an important objective, but
have some important differences. The purpose of the negotiating
conference is to seek to compromise the differences. The end result of
the negotiating conference may be a compromise satisfactory for both
parties. Sometimes, failure to reach a satisfactory compromise or a
stand off with an agreement. In a situation like this one has try to
again at a later date. An important fact is that negotiation differ from
“Influencing” or “Team Decision Making”.
During J R Jayewardene's and R Premadasa regime, the Blood Thirsty
LTTE top carders and the Government had many Negotiation Conference to
settle the ethnic war. It continued for more than three decades.
There are four options for a negotiation. They are “we win – they win
situation known as (1) win win situation. Then, (2) we win – you lose
scenario. (3) Temporary give the win to the opposing side and withdraw
temporary and a reinforce your strategies to attack, in the future and
win (4) The worse Negotiation is we lose – they lose situation”.
During the J R Jayewardene's and Premadasa regimes, the blood-thirst
LTTE top carders and Government had many negotiations in negotiation
discussion here and even in posh hotels like Hilton and abroad. LTTE
took the government to a “Right Royal Ride”, which ultimately ended in a
“they lose – we lose situation. The negotiation of LTTE and the then J
R/Premadasa/Chandrika/Ranil regimes, although done genuine to stop the
terrorism and Blood Bath, was unsuccessful, because both parties did not
agree for a win – win Negotiation. The present President Rajapaksa very
wisely knew that there is no point in going to a negotiation table with
the undemocratic, autocratic LTTE carders, which will end up with “We
lose They lose” situation. He adopted “Fire to Fire” philosophy which
was hundred percent successful. The great war heroes had close
negotiations with the Defence Forces which was headed by the
Commander-in-Chief Mahinda Rajapaksa. Rajapaksa firmly believe that
“Attack was the best form of defence.”
Government completely destroyed the terrorist. During J R, Premadasa,
Chandrika, Ranil, regimes, they could not achieve success as “Impasse
occurred, because LTTE demanded more than the Governments offered. I
presume this will be a good example, relevant to show “they lose we
lose” Negotiation scenario. Both parties lost.
For a successful negotiation settlement win win situation for both
parties is necessary. For a successful negotiation, collective
bargaining process is vital. Take for an example, a labour dispute. The
process through which representatives of management and the Trade Unions
meet to Negotiate, a labour agreement, can be called a collective
bargaining.
According to the National Labour Relation Acts followed by respective
countries both Management and Labour are required by Law to Negotiate,
wage, hours, terms and conditions of employment “In good Faith”. In
short, both parties are making every reasonable effort to arrive at
agreement. Proposals are being matched with counter proposals. Both
teams, generally go into the bargaining “Negotiating Table” after doing
their homework properly.
If the negotiator is able to obtain all or most of their demands,
without the other party to completely break off negotiations unless The
Best Alternative to a negotiated agreement, known in the Marketing
Jargon as BATNA, then it becomes a successful negotiation.
Tracing the History of Negotiation in Business Management, it was
during the 20th century, an academic Mary Parker Follett, sow the seeds
of negotiation in the business world. During the 1960's, Gerard I
Nierenberg, published “The Art of Negotiation”, where he mentioned the
Philosophies of the Negotiators and the direction a negotiation takes.
Further, Nierenberg's Book, “Everybody Wins”, assured that all
parties benefit from Negotiation process, which also produces more
successful outcomes then “Winner takes all approach”.
With the publication of “Getting to yes” Harvard Roger Fisher and
William Ury's – the business world and its expert after reading these
books effectively applied in problem solving in matters of negotiation.
For record purpose a number of scholar such as SARA COBB – George
Mason University, Len Riskin University of Missouri, Howard Raiffa
Harvard University, Robert Mc Kersia, Lawrence Susskind at Mit Adil
Najam and Jeswald Salacuse at Fletcher school of Law and Diplomacy
scholars, authorities on negotiation contributed a lot to enlightened
the business world about negotiation.
In my next article Part II, which will follow, will contain -
(a) Negotiation Process -
(b) The six steps of Negotiation prices -
(c) Reviewing Negotiation -
(d) Tactics
|