THE BIG MOMENTUM
Reconstruction and resettlement in Northern Province
‘A Sri Lankan success story’:
[Continued from December 25]
S B Divaratne
Secretary, Presidential Task Force for Resettlement, Development and
Security – Northern Province
The first priority in resettlement was to provide temporary shelter
to the returning IDPs. Housing had been a critical issue even when this
area was under LTTE control.
Children of joy |
Major cause for the damage was removal of roofs, doors and windows.
It has been reported that the LTTE instructed people to remove whatever
possible and retreat with the LTTE so that they can construct houses at
a new location.
The PTF in consultation with several humanitarian agencies decided on
three types of shelter, i.e. Temporary, semi-permanent and permanent
houses. Action was taken to provide cash grants and shelter materials as
an immediate solution for the people, either to repair part of the
damage houses or to construct a temporary type of shelter.
On the request of GoSL, a cash grant of Rs 25,000 was funded by UNHCR.
A total of 86,500 families have received the shelter grant as at
31.05.2012.
At the latter stage, action was taken to construct semi-permanent
houses in place of temporary shelters as an when livelihood activities
progressed.
The INGOs were requested to engage more in constructing
semi-permanent houses rather than supporting temporary shelters.
The GoSL cannot take responsibility to put up houses for all the
resettled families. What was possible and what was done by the GoSL was
to support them to put up temporary shelters and subsequently, to repair
damaged houses and construct semi-permanent houses.
The Government's aim was to develop the economic base of the people
from the inception of the implementation of the resettlement programme
with the hope that economic empowerment through enhancing the livelihood
activities would enable them to put up their own houses.
Water and sanitation
Another priority was to ensure safe drinking water and proper
sanitation for the resettled families. Nearly 15,000 wells were cleaned
or renovated during this period. Most of the dug wells in the resettled
areas were contaminated and damaged. Renovation of wells was considered
a top priority during humanitarian phase of resettlement. National Water
Supply and Drainage Board (NWS & DB) was entrusted to take lead in this
exercise with support from UNICEF. Besides, NGO partners also played a
major role in cleaning and reconstruction of dug wells.
Involvement of UN Agencies and I/NGOs on Resettlement
Over the last two and half years, UN Agencies and INGOs committed
significant resources in providing humanitarian assistance to recover
and rebuild the lives of the displaced families. Between 2009-2012, the
UN system in Sri Lanka has provided US$ 437,942,702 assistance to the
Northern Province on relief, humanitarian and recovery efforts led by
the Government of Sri Lanka. With the resettlement process picking up,
towards the end of 2009-2010 the UN, in collaboration with all partners
and in support of Government efforts mobilized resources and provided
assistance aimed at supporting the re-establishment of services and
livelihood across the Northern Region. The international assistance was
the result of consultative process led by the government of Sri Lanka
through the PTF on assistance needed to provide humanitarian assistance.
In order to streamline the UN, I/NGO contribution a Joint Plan for
Assistance (JPA) was signed. The starting point for the JPA is the
guidelines provided by the PTF for assistance. It was safer for the
Government to promote the I/NGOs to support this initiative on
humanitarian assistance since the area has been cleared of land mines
and security issues were resolved. When the resettlement commenced,
their involvement was restricted to those places in order to maximize
external assistance. The PTF requested that humanitarian assistance be
provided mainly for shelter, water and sanitation at the initial stage.
As and when recovery process advanced, the I/NGOs were requested to
invest on livelihood activities.
Early Recovery
The second phase of the humanitarian assistance was directed towards
early recovery by providing assistance to commence economic operations.
More attention was given to activities that would support recommencement
of economic operations. The GOSL stepped up interventions and further
promoted early recovery initiatives to revitalize the livelihoods of the
resettled families. These included the creation of a supportive
environment for immediate agricultural season through the provision of
inputs and services to enhance the agricultural activities. As many as
39 INGOs were involved in supporting livelihood development. The
principle adopted was to provide grants in cash or kind for resettled
families to re-engage in economic activities that they were engaged in
prior to displacement.
As a policy, each and every resettled family was provided with a
package of assistance valued at not less than Rs. 35,000, so that it
would be adequate to meet the initial requirement of any livelihood.
During this period, major emphasis was directed towards resuscitation of
paddy cultivation, clearing of abandoned paddy lands for cultivations,
engaging in highland cultivation and other food crops, cultivation of
high valued crops with lift irrigation, home gardening and fisheries
including inland fishing, deep sea and lagoon fishing.
In addition, special attention was given to improve dairy farming,
goat rearing, backyard poultry and self-employment. Targeting the
poorest of poor, a programme was launched to provide cash for work to
rehabilitate and infrastructure facilities while generating employment
for the poor.
During the early recovery phase, the PTF directed all Divisional
Secretaries to prepare a family profile of those resettled families as
an “Action Plan” for the purpose of future planning.
A completed family profile is now available with the Divisional
Secretaries for future planning focusing on family based development
programmes.
Those that remained to be resettled have reduced to approximately
5,424 persons from the original case-load. The resettled process is
envisaged to be completed as soon as the remaining demining progresses.
The resettlement of the IDPs who were displaced prior to 2008 – 2009,
though the exact number is not yet certain, is being addressed. For
example, there are nearly 15,000 Muslim families who were forced to
leave Jaffna and Mannar areas by the LTTE presently living in several
places in Sri Lanka; the majority being located in Puttalam district. In
addition, considerable number of Sinhala and Muslim families was
displaced during this period. The Tamil people, who have gone to South
India, still living as refuges, are to be resettled if they volunteer to
come back. In fact, a small number of families, has already returned.
These categories are protracted IDPs. The process of resettling this
category is complicated due to several reasons; the main reason being
that some had sold out their properties when they left. Further, the
lands belonging to families who left were taken over by the LTTE and
distributed among the families favoured by them. However, the GoSL is
determined to resolve these issues and complete the resettlement
process. Those who are willing to return to their original places are
provided with initial facilities to encourage returning.
Reconstruction and Development
Having successfully completed humanitarian and early recovery phase
of resettlement, the next steps was to embark upon rebuilding the
Northern Province through reconstruction and development. By this time,
nearly 200,000 people had been resettled and the lives of the resettled
families were moving towards normalcy. In order to achieve
sustainability, major emphasis and substantive investment was set apart
for infrastructure development. It was considered a major requirement to
foster development and sustainability. In this endeavour, several
projects were formulated to restore social and economic infrastructure.
The GoSL was able to secure significant external assistance (loans)
through commitments made by the donors. By this time, the entire
administrative mechanism was re-established in the Province. Since the
initial work required for early recovery was completed during the first
two phases of the resettlement process, the major construction and
rehabilitation were funded under these reconstruction programmes.
Restoration of Health Services
A substantial investment has been for restoration and upgrading of
health services that were paralysed. High priority was accorded to
renovate primary healthcare institutions and to improve medical care for
the resettled families during the 180-Day programme. Restoration of
health services include renovation of damaged heath institutions,
reconstruction of new buildings, procurement of equipment, etc.
Major hospitals at all the districts have been renovated and provided
with additional building facilities, equipment and manpower. At present,
161 preventive care institutions and 102 curative care institutions are
functioning. The total expenditure for rehabilitation of the healthcare
from 2009 to 2011 amounts to Rs. 2,135mn, and an investment of Rs.
9,254Mn has been allocated for ongoing and future projects. The health
sector manpower of all categories is almost equal to the approved cadre
for the Province. The mortality rate, malnutrition, infant mortality,
low birth and weight rates in the Northern Province are below the
national average which is impressive indicator reflecting the
development of the health sector.
To be continued |