Strether: a vessel of conscience:
'I'll save you if I can'
What I remembered most distinctly about Henry James' 'The
Ambassadors' was the account of Strether's visit to Mme d Vionnet at her
home. I was no less impressed by it when I I re-read the novel. Let me
recount it.
Strether had already met her briefly for the first time at a
reception and been struck by the fact that this so-called woman of the
world was so little unlike the respectable ladies he had left behind in
Woollett. Now this unexpectedly favourable initial impression gets
further adjusted. First, the appearance and atmosphere of her home
itself, seeped in culture and tradition, provides an intuition as to the
quality of its mistress: "The general result of this was something for
which he had no name on the spot quite ready, but something he would
come nearest to naming in speaking of it as the air of supreme
respectability, the consciousness, small, still, reserved, but none the
less distinct and diffused, of private honour. The air of supreme
respectability - that was a strange blank wall for his adventure to have
brought him to break his nose against."
Supreme respectability
That long drawn out first sentence, with its vague beginning - "no
name on the spot "-, followed by the diffident attempt at clarity -
''come nearest to naming" - , the stumbling onto the right description -
"air of supreme respectability"-, and the groping to qualify this
further - "small, still, reserved" yet "distinct and diffused" -; all
this follows the outworking of Strether's thought process as he tries to
make sense of the impression the place makes on him.
|
Virginia
Woolf |
The awkward intricacy of the expression actually captures the halting
manner in which the mind works in such a situation. That is to say, a
mind such as Strether's which is not blinkered but receptive to external
influences however unexpected.
This is how Strether's original sense of Mme de Vionnet's similarity
to the American women gets altered to "the sense of her rare unlikeness
to the women he had known....Everything in fine made her immeasurably
new, and nothing so new as the old house and the old objects." Such is
the effect upon him of the house, but now his attention fixes on its
mistress:
"She was seated, near the fire, on a small stuffed and fringed chair,
one of the few modern articles in the room; and she leaned back in it
with her hands clasped in her lap and no movement, in all her person,
but the fine prompt play of her deep young face...Madame de Vionnet,
while Strether was there, wasn't to shift her posture by an inch."
As she sits almost motionless like the embodiment of all the positive
impressions Strether has received so far, we can sense his being carried
away and weakened in his resolve to deliver his ultimatum. She senses
this herself and takes the bull gently by the horns: " 'I don't think
you seriously believe in what you're doing," she said; 'but all the
same, you know, I'm going to treat you quite as if you did." Not
surprisingly, Strether's favourable intuitions about her come to the
surface: "At the back of his head, behind everything, was the sense that
she was - there, before him, close to him, in vivid imperative form -
one of the rare women he had so often heard of, read of, thought of, but
never met, whose very presence, look, voice, the mere contemporaneous
fact of whom, from the moment it was at all presented, made a relation
of mere reconition. That was not the kind of woman he had ever found Mrs
Newsome.."
Actual manner
Again, note the skill with which the style, straining almost
over-meticulously to find the appropriate words, reflects the actual
manner in which Strether's consciousness gropes towards an understanding
of the situation with which he is confronted. We are hardly therefore
taken by surprise when, after their conversation has ranged over what
she has done for Chad and she asks:" 'Well, don't you think that for
that -' ", he takes the words out of her mouth and finishes for her: "
'I ought to save you?; ' " The chapter thereafter concludes: "So it was
that the way to meet her - and the way, as well, in a manner, to get off
- came over him. He heard himself use the exorbitant word, the very
sound of which helped to determine his flight. 'I'll save you if I can.'
"
The wheel has come full circle. Strether, unable to stem the tide of
the impressions he has received since meeeting Mme de Vionnet, has
revised his mission from saving Chad to saving her. The daring of his
surrender to this reversal is almost too much for him and he has to take
his leave. And if we are utterly convinced by this conclusion to the
episode, it is entirely due to the brilliance with which James' late
style has followed the twists and turns of Strether's consciousness as
it painstakingly makes it way there.
Nearly twenty years earlier, in his essay, 'The Art of Fiction'
(1884), James had written these famous words: "Catching the very note
and trick, the strange irregular rhythm of life, that is the effort
whose strenuous force keeps Fiction on her feet." When he wrote this he
was still very much the traditional novelist, working from an omniscient
viewpoint. In 'The Ambassadors' he is the pioneering psychological
novelist using a third person monologue whereby everything is seen from
his protaganist's viewpoint. Yet the words of his essay now apply even
more forcefully, his late style "catching the very note and trick and
the rhythm" of the interior life of his protagonist wherein the story
unfolds.
Over fifteen years after 'The Ambassadors' was published Virginia
Woolf, whom many regard as the pioneer of the stream of consciousness
method, wrote these equally famous words: "The mind receives a myriad
impressions--trivial, fantastic, evanescent, or engraved with the
sharpness of steel....Life is not a series of gig-lamps symmetrically
arranged; life is a luminous halo, a semi-transparent envelope
surrounding us from the beginning of consciousness to the end. Is it not
the task of the novelist to convey this varying, this unknown and
uncircumscribed spirit, whatever aberration or complexity it may
display, with as little mixture of the alien and external as possible?"
It is evident that James had already anticipated Woolf's insistence
on the primacy of the mind of man as the filter through which the
impressions of life should pass. The great difference is that James does
not, in the process, discard the moral purpose that drives the great
novelist.
His vessel of consciousness, as we noted last week, is also a vessel
of conscience. Strether does not merely drift amid a sea of impressions,
he allows the awakening of his consciousness to rouse his conscience to
do what he believes to be the right thing even if it means sacrificing
his own interests.
Richness and complexity
And it his here that the thematic value of the novel comes to the
fore. Its apparent theme is the need to live life to the full as
epitomised in Strether's exhortation to Little Bilham: "Live all you
can, it's a mistake not to." It is Strether's exposure to the richness
and complexity of Parisian life that opens his mind to life's potential.
He tries to realise this at least vicariously by enabling Chad and Mme
de Vionnet to continue what he believes to be their beautiful
relationship. When he discovers that the relationship is of the common
type for all its semblance of rarity, he does his duty by Mme de Vionnet
and prepares to return to Woollett, "having got nothing for himself" and
having rejected the opportunity of making a new life for himself with
Maria Gostrey.
This decision Leavis could not understand. But it is artistically as
necessary to the real theme of the novel as was Isabel Archer's decision
in 'The Portrait of a Lady' to remain with the despicable man she had
married. The theme of that novel is that the spirit is not free to live
as it wishes but gets trapped by circumstances, resulting in the need
for sacrifice if the spirit is to remain pure.
The theme of 'The Ambassadors' is not dissimilar. The spirit, in its
quest to live and let live, 'breaks its nose' against the reality that
the life offered by the world is ultimately corrupt and treacherous. The
only way for the spirit to keep its integrity is to acknowledge its
mistake and turn its back on the type of life-fulfilment that the world
offers. Because Strether, unlike Isabel, is in the evening of his life,
this ending does not seem as tragic as that of 'The Portrait'. That is
why one thinks of 'The Ambassadors' as a tragi-comedy.
|