British newspapers back PM’s opposition to press laws
UK: Britain's newspapers on Friday praised senior judge Brian
Leveson's report into media ethics but warned its recommendation to
introduce new laws could “suffocate the free press”.
Leveson, who led an eight-month inquiry sparked by the phone-hacking
scandal at Rupert Murdoch's News of the World tabloid, said there should
be an independent self-regulatory body, underpinned by legislation.
But Fleet Street mostly backed Prime Minister David Cameron's
response, which indicated he would oppose any state regulation of the
press.
“We agree with Lord Justice Leveson: a free press is one of the
safeguards of our democracy,” said the Daily Telegraph's editorial.
“Where we part company with the learned judge... is in his belief
that either of these two bulwarks of British liberty would be served by
a regulatory body for newspapers that is underpinned by legislation.”
The centre-right broadsheet, which has long voiced opposition to new
press laws, said Leveson's insistence that his recommendations did not
amount to statutory regulation was “either sophistry or naivety”. “What
is to stop MPs amending it now and in the future so that it no longer
resembles the benign legislative vehicle envisaged by the judge?” it
asked.
Cameron commissioned the inquiry in July 2011 in the wake of a
Guardian report alleging that the News of the World hacked the
voicemails of murdered schoolgirl Milly Dowler.
The Guardian praised the 2,000-page report's “detail and clarity” but
gave only conditional backing to proposals for a statutory framework.
“Clearly... the drafting of the Leveson statute requires great care,
real deliberation and cross-party support to avoid endless amendments
and additions that move it from light touch to something more sinister,”
said its editorial.
But it called on Cameron to “think carefully before dismissing
significant parts” of the report.
Centre-left publication The Independent said there was “only one flaw
in Lord Justice Leveson's epic verdict -- but it's a crucial flaw.
“Mr Cameron is right: legislation would be unnecessary, complex and
slow,” it concluded.
The Prime Minister faces a parliamentary row as both opposition
leader Ed Miliband and Nick Clegg, leader of junior coalition partners
the Liberal Democrats, support new laws.
The Murdoch-owned The Times backed Cameron's stance taken despite
Leveson's proposal of legislation “that was politically hard to resist.”
“Sir Brian described the proposal as 'essential', hinting that to
demur would be a rejection of his entire scheme.
Mr Cameron did not accept this, and he was right not to,” argued its
leading article.
“Mr Cameron appreciated that in addition to being unnecessary, the
proposed law would pose huge practical difficulties and breach the vital
principle that parliament should not take responsibility for the
regulation of a free press,” it added. Leading business title the
Financial Times called the report “a damning indictment of the culture
and practices of the newspaper industry”, but stopped short of calling
for state-backed regulation.
AFP |