'Law should uphold Constitution' - Appeals Judge
'We are bound to uphold and defend the Constitution. The law should
be there to minimize conflicts and interpretation is of paramount
importance," new Court of Appeal Judge Justice P.W.D.C. Jayathilake said
at the ceremonial silting to welcome him as a court of appeal
judge on November 14 he said. "When I was a law student, I placed
very much emphasis on and took a keen interest in jurisprudence that is
the science of law. The jurisprudence allows us to observe the very
fundamentals which resulted in creation of law. As a result of
variations and changes that occurred periodically, geographically and
socially have moulded many varied and valid theories of law that could
be identified through jurisprudence. Schools of law includes the opinion
of visionaries from Socrates, who showed the world the need for law and
up to Karl Marx who's ideology as that the law must be defunct in human
society.
"Legal systems develop from "Grund Norm" which is considered as the
topmost layer of the pyramid as per Kelson's "Pure theory" According to
Kelson, there won't be existence of a legal system without the Grund
Norm. In our law what we consider our Grund Norm is the constitution.
Hence we are bound to uphold and defend the constitution. The validity
of legislation made for the fulfillment of the social needs under the
authority of the Grund Norm could be identified by applying the Pure
theory.
"As per the theory under the school of "analytical positivism" the
need of law arises as a result of the conflict of interests. When the
interests are different conflicts occur. Hence the law should be there
to minimize the conflicts, in other words the purpose of law is the
minimization of the conflicts.
"When applying the law to minimize the conflicts, interpretation is
of paramount importance.
Interpretation according to the "Literal rule" delivers a narrow
effect. It is easy for the literal rule to be applied to interpret the
law. Literal interpretation could be obtained eventhough the computer by
mere input of data. Similar ideas could be found in the school of
"Scandinavian realism".
"The style of language by which the law is written is very important
as the words can include direct as well as emotional meanings, yet for
all, more gravity lies with emotional meanings. The computer does not
have this emotional intelligence. Hence the emotional meaning needs to
be understood by the human brain. A wide meaning could be derived from
law by applying the "Golden rule" for the purpose of interpretation. The
"Golden rule" is that the law is not for law, but for society.
"The law is only a prediction. Therefore the law in practice cannot
be perceived only by studying law alone. In order to understand the
practical aspect of real law, we need to study the judge's who give
interpretations to the law. Oliver Wendel Holmes has shown this theory
in the school of "American realism".
Holmes further says that judges may normally tend to believe the
evidence given by a smartly dressed charming woman rather than that of a
shabbily poor man.
"This shows the nature and reality of the law in practice.
"I have had the privilege of serving in all courts of first instance,
from Primary Court to High Court in our judicial system. During my
service, I had served mostly outstations. After 20 years of service as a
district Judge and a Magistrate and seven years as the Secretary of the
Judicial Service Commission, with my appointment as a High Court Judge.
I was posed to Ampara which was my first station as a primary court
judge. By this you will understand how socialist the administration
concerning judges is.
"By the time I was appointed as a Judge of the Court of Appeal I had
served for 23 years as a judge and seven years as the Secretary of
Judicial Service Commission and still another 11 months as a Ministry
Secretary.
I believe I had a deeper insight in to the judicial service and
judges during that 11 months period in which I served outside the
judiciary. It was during that period that I struck the idea that our
court should have been a bit more flexible and the judges a bit more
milder.
"In Colombo I served for only a few months in High Court, Colombo and
one and a half years in Commercial High Court. During this short period
I had the privilege of associating with young lawyers, senior lawyers
and learned President's Counsels in Colombo.
"I must honestly and frankly state that my respect towards the legal
profession increased during this period.
I have gathered and learned a lot through the lawyers of official and
unofficial bar appeared in Colombo High Court and Commercial High Court.
I believe that I will have more opportunities to enjoy the same
privilege in this court as well.
"Let me conclude here by expressing my thank particularly to Attorney
General Palitha Fernando and MP the President of the Bar Association of
Sri Lanka Wijedasa Rajapakse.
"My love and my gratitude go to my parents, teachers and family
members for whose devotion and support that helped me to reach these
heights. To my relations and my friends. Who have supported me in many
different ways. And I thank you all, for attending this occasion to
felicitate my elevation, I ask most humbly for your cooperation and your
guidance in the Law that we administer in the next decade of my life.
Further I express my gratitude, to my colleagues for being present on
this occasion to welcome me.
I thank you all, most humbly".
|