Economy at centre stage, very
rightly
The 16th
Non-aligned Heads of State Summit in Tehran would be letting
down its main constituency, which is the developing world, if it
does not take complete stock of the global economic situation
and ascertain ways as to how the poor of the world could be
protected against economic shocks.
As pointed out by President Mahinda Rajapaksa at the Summit,
Sri Lanka has managed to ward off some of the ill-effects of the
global economic recession and has remained resilient in an ocean
of material misery, but the developing countries should from now
on put their heads together on finding solutions to the economic
issues that come their way, in a collective fashion.
By an interesting coincidence, even as the President called
for a reflection of the current changes in the world economic
power balance in the global financial institutions that
virtually manage the international economy, there came the news
that some preponderant powers are chafing at the developing
countries attempting to have a greater influence in running
these organizations. Therefore, organizations such as NAM have
their work cut out for them.
They must strive to turn their collective weight into a
decisive factor in shaping the world economy to meet the
legitimate interests of the developing countries.
It would not be an exaggeration to state that organizations
such as NAM have not been sufficiently effective over the past
few decades. The fact that the majority of developing countries
were highly enamoured of the market economy development strategy
could probably account for this seeming lassitude, but NAM and
its likes cannot afford to remain passive in the face of global
economic developments that could impact their wellbeing, any
more. They need to collectively work out ways of having a
decisive voice in the running of global financial institutions
and this should figure as a priority.
Meanwhile, governments of developing countries should
increasingly look to ways of empowering people at the
grassroots. This is reportedly happening to a degree in Sri
Lanka through rural development strategies, such as Divi Neguma
and Gama Neguma, and the Lankan state is obliged to continually
monitor the progress that is being made through these home-grown
paradigms.
What should be aimed at is not a mere ‘trickle down’ of
wealth from the wealthy to the poor, but the empowerment of the
disadvantaged groups in the truest sense. Hopefully, Sri Lanka
would be in a position to share her expertise with the rest of
the Third World, as time goes by.
It should be plain to all responsible and progressive-minded
local political actors that it is the economy that is ‘the
thing.’ If the state fails on the economic front, it is likely
to fail in most other spheres of any importance. Equitable
economic growth and a reduction of youth unemployment, for
instance, would contribute remarkably towards social stability.
Prime concern should be directed towards consolidating society’s
material base if social harmony of any durability is to be
ushered in.
These imperatives and truths need to be impressed by the
government on its coalition partners and other sections which
collaborate with it. We consider it important to stress this
point because there is currently a very unfortunate tendency for
some political forces to focus on divisive religious and other
issues which could work against social solidarity. No less a
person than President Rajapaksa has cautioned against the use of
religious and ethnic slogans which could undo all that has been
achieved by way of domestic stability. These words of caution
must ideally be followed.
The proliferation of religious and connected fundamentalisms
could never accrue to the good of human society. Religious
identities and traditions must, of course, be protected but
these should never be politicized, ideally. The politicization
of these factors could militate against nation-building and when
a polity is deeply segmented on religious, ethnic and other such
divisive lines, it cannot be easily brought together again. |