Sri Lanka and its relations with India
Text of the speech delivered by High Commissioner for Sri Lanka to
India Prasad Kariyawasam, at the Public Forum organised by the Kerala
International Centre on June 13, 2012
|
High Commissioner for Sri Lanka to
India Prasad Kariyawasam |
My visit to Kerala is a manifestation of Sri Lanka’s desire to expand
relations with the Southern Indian states and the primacy we have given
in this context to Kerala. Sri Lanka and Kerala have had an age old
relationship with vibrant people-to-people contact that is recorded in
history. Though the economies of Sri Lanka and Kerala appear similar at
first glance, there is potential for us to create synergies and leverage
market advantage through creation of a common platform on commodities
that both Sri Lanka and Kerala can dominate in the world market. This
includes spices, coconut and rubber products. Sri Lanka is keen to
revive and reinvigorate ties with Kerala in all spheres including the
political contacts.
My topic today is Sri Lanka and its relations with India.
Relations between India and Sri Lanka are ancient and predate the
modern State system based on the Peace of Westphalia of 1648. Bonds
between our peoples, our kings and our rulers are even older than
recorded history.
Somehow, with the evolution of history, that is, the long years of
colonial rule, the travails of freedom struggles and Independence, and
the efforts thereafter to govern in the modern Nation State System,
which itself is evolving; while dealing at the same time with several
complications inherited from colonial rule; resulted in the blurring of
the ties that bound our people in the ancient past.
Today, with the end of terrorism that plagued Sri Lanka for 30 years,
and the rise of India on the world stage, we have a historic opportunity
to once again go back to building our traditional friendships,
especially with the Southern States of India and restore our age-old
ties.
Historical chronicles
This is a path that our two nations have already embarked upon.
Relations with Kerala are most important to Sri Lanka in this context.
In our historical narratives, Kerala has found a special place and was
referred to during Emperor Asoka’s time as 'Keralaputra'. We have had
continuous people-to-people and economic contacts thriving until the
arrival of European powers in our region. It is widely believed in Sri
Lanka that exchanges between the people of Kerala and Southern Sri Lanka
was a normal fact of life until recent times.
In this context, I want to first set before you, very briefly, what
Sri Lanka was historically and the nature of Sri Lanka’s relations with
India.
A strong influence on Sri Lanka’s history right throughout, for
thousands of years, has been her position in the Indian Ocean, namely,
her strategic location: an island, located midway between East and West.
For over 2000 years before the advent of the colonial powers, Sri Lanka
served as a safe and important entrepôt, providing ports for the
exchange of goods between East and West; a contact point between two
great regions.
Sri Lanka, since time immemorial, has seen the continual absorption
of influences from the outside world. This is evident in the
multilayered make up of the population, its manners, its traditions,
culture, architecture, food and attire. But, throughout history, the
people of Sri Lanka have displayed a resistance to attempts at physical
conquest and control. Nevertheless, we have welcomed those who settle
and integrate with us including those from Kerala. Being divided by
India by just 30 miles, a narrow strip of Sea, Sri Lanka has been close
enough to India to be influenced throughout history, but remained
fiercely independent so as to preserve a distinct individuality.
The history of Sri Lanka from the 3rd Century BC onwards is one of
the best documented in the region. The island has a collection of
historical chronicles and religious writings which have no parallel in
South Asia. Recorded history begins over 2300 years ago when Emperor
Asoka of India sent his son and daughter to Sri Lanka. They set out to
Sri Lanka from Sanchi and were received in Sri Lanka’s ancient Kingdom
of Anuradhapura. This is an important civilizational link between our
two countries.
A sapling of the Pipal tree under which Prince Siddharta attained
enlightenment as Gautama Buddha in Bodhgaya, was taken to Sri Lanka by
Emperor Asoka’s daughter. That tree continues to stand in Anuradhapura
even today. It is acknowledged as the oldest recorded tree in the world
and has remained in continuous worship since the inception in 3rd
Century BC. For nearly 13 centuries Anuradhapura remained the principal
seat of government and the major centre of Sri Lankan culture and
civilisation. Its monasteries were great centres of learning, visited by
scholars and pilgrims from many parts of Asia. It housed an
international trading community, which included traders from India,
China, Rome, Arabia and Persia. It was from the court at Anuradhapura
that Sri Lankan ambassadors were despatched on several occasions to the
imperial courts of Rome and China. The Great Indian Buddhist scholar and
commentator, Buddhaghosa, spent many years in Anuradhapura during the
5th Century, codifying the Buddhist scriptures which had been lost in
India. Gunavarman, the Kashmiri monk, who carried Buddhism to Indonesia
and China, passed through Sri Lanka, and must certainly have visited the
city’s monasteries. Monks from Anuradhapura went out to many lands, such
as India, China, Cambodia and Java, leaving in those distant places,
inscriptions and records of their visits.
|
Kerala is a
great tourist destination spot. File photo |
Influences from Southern India have been of fundamental importance
from prehistoric times. For a thousand years before the arrival of the
Portuguese, several conquerors from South India invaded parts of Sri
Lanka and established dependencies. At the same time, there was a long
history of Sri Lankan rulers sending emissaries to Southern India for
their queens and for cultural and economic pursuits. The Buddhist
temples from the Polonnaruwa period onwards incorporated Hindu shrines
in their premises. This is a feature one would find in Buddhist temples
even today.
Ancient civilisations
It has been said that ‘there is no island in the world that has
attracted the attention of authors in so many distant ages and so many
different countries as Ceylon’. During much of the historic period,
there are descriptions of the island: in the Hindu epics, in accounts of
early Chinese Buddhist travellers, in the works of the Greek, Roman and
Arab geographers, and eventually in the Portuguese and Dutch archives.
One of the earliest foreign records is that of a pilot in one of
Alexander’s fleets, who seems to have visited Sri Lanka in the 4th
Century BC. In the 1st Century AD, Pliny gives a description of the
country and its people, which he seems to have compiled from the
accounts of Sri Lankan ambassadors to the court of Emperor Claudius.
Some of the most accurate accounts are considered to be by the Chinese
Pilgrim Scholar, Fa-Hsien, who visited Sri Lanka in 5th Century to visit
the Buddhist monasteries which by that time had become great centres of
learning. The beauty and wealth of the island had caught the imagination
of Arab writers to such an extent that the land they referred to as
‘Serendib’ was incorporated into the stories of Sinbad the Sailor. They
believed that Adam lived there when he was exiled from Paradise. Even
today, a Holy Mountain in Sri Lanka, 7,300 feet in height, called Siri
Pada or Adam’s Peak, which has, at its Summit, a depression resembling a
foot print, is considered by the Muslims as Adam’s. The same footprint
is venerated by Buddhists as that of the Buddha; by Hindus as that of
Shiva; and by Christians as that of St. Thomas the Apostle.
It is also said of Sri Lanka that ‘there is probably no place that
occurs so frequently or is so correctly situated on ancient maps’.
Perhaps nothing conveys this so graphically as the map of the world by
Ptolemy, the Egyptian geographer of the 2nd Century AD. There, Sri
Lanka, referred to as Taprobane, appears about 20 times its actual size,
dominating the twin arcs of the Indian Ocean formed by the Bay of Bengal
and the Arabian Sea.
All this stands testimony to the fact that Sri Lanka was not only a
rich and beautiful island but that it was also the seat of one of the
small but important historical civilisations of Asia. Historians of
science have placed the Sri Lankan builders amongst the great hydraulic
engineers of the pre-modern world, on a level with those of ancient
Egypt and China. The scale of their achievement can be measured when one
considers that in the 12th Century, there were 600 miles of man-made
canals in an island that is less than 300 miles long. The ruins of great
monasteries and cities, colossal man-made lakes, numerous inscriptions
and a large body of ancient literature still survive as testimony to the
achievements of the Sri Lankan people over a period of 2000 years and
more. They indicate that from about 3rd century BC to about the 15th
century, Sri Lanka took its place with other countries in Asia, as one
of the most advanced and developed countries of the pre-modern world.
Throughout this period, the people of Sri Lanka had evolved its own
distinctive culture and economy while keeping in close contact with the
outside world and being open to ideas and exchanges with the countries
of the Indian Ocean region and beyond.
Political party system
With the beginning of the modern era, the world began to change and
enter upon a new historical stage. Sri Lanka was compelled into forming
new relationships with powers from overseas, particularly, the Europe of
the Renaissance. The colonial expansion of the European maritime nations
had a direct political, economic and cultural impact on Sri Lanka. Our
traditional relations with the people of Kerala may have been somewhat
severed as a result. The Sri Lankan people were outmanoeuvred by
successive waves of Portuguese, Dutch and British colonisers armed with
military power and aggressive economic and diplomatic strategies of a
rising Europe. The country remained a British colony for 150 years until
Independence in 1948.
The process of transformation of Sri Lanka into a modern nation with
modern institutions, therefore, took place under colonial domination.
Modern constitutional governance in Sri Lanka commenced in 1833,
during the time of the British, with what is known as the
Colebrooke-Cameron Reforms. These reforms provided the first inklings of
constitutionalism for Sri Lanka. From this point on, constitutional
governance evolved. At first, Restricted Legislative Assemblies were
established. In due time, they were enlarged until, in 1931, the people
of Sri Lanka received Universal Adult Franchise. Thereafter, a National
Assembly was established and the political party system emerged. In
keeping with the British system of governance, a strong Bar and an
independent Judiciary developed in the country. The Parliament was
established with the advent of Independence in 1948 and the Constitution
known as the Soulbury Constitution, modelled along the Westminster model
of government, was adopted. This was not an end in itself. Although,
what may be described as a vibrant, practicing democracy was established
at the time, the process of finding the perfect constitutional model for
the empowerment of people encompassing all communities still continues
in Sri Lanka, even after 60 years of Independence.
In 1972, a new constitution was formed under an electoral mandate
given to the Left Front Government. This exercise saw Sri Lanka breaking
away from the colonial model. Continuing the process of modernisation of
the constitutional structure in Sri Lanka, another new constitution was
adopted in 1978, following the mandate given by the electorate to the
United National Party. This saw the introduction of a new constitution
that broke away completely from the previous Westminster model.
The 1972 constitution declared the President of the Republic to be
the Head of State; thereby changing the role of the Governor-General
from one of being a mere representative of The Queen to that of a
President, as a Head of State for Sri Lanka. The 1978 constitution
changed this completely, expanding the role of the President as Head of
State, Head of the Executive and of the Government and the
Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces. This 1978 constitution is the
one by which Sri Lanka is currently governed. For 30 long years, since
the late 1970s, democracy in the country was under siege. A terrorist
group, bent on carving out a separate State in the North and the East of
the country, unleashed indescribable violence on the nation. Their aim
was to convert the multi-cultural, multi-ethnic, multi-religious society
that the people of the country had enjoyed for many centuries, into a
narrow, mono-ethnic, mono-linguistic State.
To be continued
|