Welcome moves against the lawless
Civic-conscious sections of the public are bound to
have been somewhat encouraged on hearing the news that the SLFP
central command has resolved to initiate disciplinary and
punitive measures against its politicians who have been found to
have violated the law. This amounts to leading from the front in
crime-containment and we urge that the law be scrupulously
observed in both letter and spirit by the SLFP leadership in
this matter of ushering clean politics.
The public learns every now and then of the alleged
involvement of SLFP politicians in the perpetration of crimes of
numerous kinds and it is about time that the SLFP's command
structures took some concrete measures to put things right among
the party's errant members. We are quite aware that charges need
to be proved in a court of law before the guilt and culpability
of persons in the committing of crimes are established but there
is no doubt that these initial moves against lawlessness would
help greatly in sustaining the reputation and credibility of the
ruling party. Accordingly, we urge that quick action be taken by
the SLFP central command in the case of credible allegations,
when IGP N.K. Illangakoon hands in the list of names of those
SLFP politicians who have been accused of lawlessness.
It is our hope that on this occasion too the more cynical
sections of the public would not be given reason to dismiss as a
mere publicity gimmick, these reported efforts at cleansing
politics of criminality. If the ruling party shows the way in
guarding against the possibility of the organization's worthy
aims in national politics being perverted by undisciplined and
criminally-inclined persons within it, the likelihood is great
that the measures concerned would have a salutary impact on
local politics. Besides, other political parties would be
compelled to follow suit and cleanse their own Augean Stables.
The cumulative result of these measures could be an overall
enhancement in the quality of national politics.
We believe that the leadership of all local political parties
is duty and conscience-bound to cooperate with the law and order
authorities in stemming criminality in this country. In other
words, those accused of lawlessness should be brought to justice
speedily. Besides, the criminally-inclined should not be
encouraged to get into politics and remain in it. The country's
worries and torments on this score could be contained a great
deal by the timely act of preventing criminal elements and the
criminally-prone from entering politics.
This takes us back to the unresolved, huge and complex
question of decriminalizing politics. The problem is some
decades old and has its roots mainly in effort in the
mid-seventies on the part of the then central authorities to
'roll back the electoral map' or in the surreptitious moves of
those times to divest Sri Lanka of some of its democratic
attributes and credentials. In other words, the issue has its
genesis essentially in efforts make power the central
consideration in politics. When this takes place, democratic
vibrancy or development usually becomes a secondary
consideration.
However, the country cannot afford to adopt a fatalistic
attitude on these questions. The moves made by the SLFP General
Secretary in relation to those accused of lawlessness within the
party raises the possibility of sections of our current
political elite taking things in hand and reversing the
political decay which had steadily set in over the years.
A great public yearning would be met when some of these
law-breakers are truly brought to justice. The larger national
interest would need to take precedence over short term or petty
political gain.
The principal issue is the decriminalization of politics. The
deleterious process has its roots, as seen, in the decision by
political managers to induct into politics those persons with
criminal records or criminal tendencies, mainly out of the
consideration that only power matters. Quite a few of our
political organizations are guilty of this offence. Accordingly,
we need a strong consensus among our political entities and
actors that none who could undermine democratic politics should
be allowed to run for public office. This, they would need to do
in consideration of the national good. |