Siobhain McDonagh’s researching journalist
Prof. Rajiva WIJESINGHA, MP
A very strange article about the meeting at the House of Commons to
screen ‘Lies Agreed Upon’ appeared on the Athirvu.com website on October
13, 2011. I believe it was written by the young man called Daran whom I
had befriended at the event, who told me that he was a freelance
journalist called Canaa, but who turned out to have entered the event as
a researcher for the Labour MP Siobhain McDonagh.
The article was intended to suggest that the event had been a
failure, that the organizers had tried to keep out Tamils but three
intrepid ones had gained entrance, and that they had dominated the
event. That this is not correct will be apparent to anyone who watches
the video of the event, which is available on the website of the Sri
Lanka High Commission in London.
Channel 4
I will therefore only deal here with a few obvious falsehoods. The
claim that there were only three Tamils present is falsified by the
article itself, which launches the usual attack on Mrs Rajeswari, with
the claim that she ‘the mouthpiece of Sri Lankan government alleged that
Channel 4 is trying to create a war in Sri Lanka again and requested
that Tamils should be allowed to live peacefully. She also blamed the
leadership of the LTTE.’ The others, Tamil as well as British, who made
a similar point are ignored, since Mr Daran wants to present the event
as a battle between three Tamils and 150 Sinhalese.
Simon Hughes |
He does grant that ‘Four British MPs were present during the
screening of the video but three of them left the hall in the middle of
the event’. This ignores the peers who were present, and the fact that
the MPs left when a division was called, and many of them came back.
The one who failed to do so was Siobhain McDonagh, but she had of
course left two researchers behind. Entertainingly, Daran claims later
on that ‘It was interesting to note that only four British MPs attended
at this event and they fell into sleep immediately after few minutes of
commencing the screening’.
Pressure from the LTTE
Another blatant falsehood was the claim that one of the Tamils
present condemned me for talking about ‘Tamil terrorists’. In fact, as
the video footage makes clear, he was talking about an intervention from
the floor, and I in fact supported his plea and asked that all of us,
however emotional we felt, make a distinction between the terrorist
Tigers and the Tamils, whose welfare as equal citizens of Sri Lanka must
be supported.
Finally, Daran claims that a journalist from Channel 4 ‘managed to
infiltrate’ and ‘raised many questions to the disappointment of GoSL’.
On the contrary she refused to answer a question raised following
Daran’s assertion that Channel 4 had claimed their video was not edited
and this had been authenticated, as he put it, though he could not say
by whom. Later he declared that it was by the American Institute of
Technology, but the only institution of that name that Google turned up
was a driving school.
Dangerous glamour
Doubtless Siobhain McDonagh has her reasons for using such a confused
young man as a researcher. But what is even more startling is the
evidence of his involvement in even more vicious forms of Tiger
propaganda. Having told me that he would send the material that
substantiated his claim that hospitals had been shelled, he later said
that ‘after careful consideration, I can’t give you that entire video’.
Instead he sent me simply the section of Dr Shanmugarajah talking, which
was nothing new since I had been asked to comment on such when they
first came out, and had then made clear my view that the poor man and
his peers were under pressure from the LTTE.
I told Daran that I had been surprised he had agreed to send me the
whole, and was sad he felt he could not do this. My query about when and
where the bits he sent were taken remains unanswered, as do similar
queries about the other pictures he sent.
No response
For the young man could not let well alone, and sent me two more
excerpts. One, which he accompanied with the claim ‘This is shocking?
Isn’t it?’ had pictures of aircraft and then smoke at a distance, after
which there were scenes of dead bodies and wailing. I suspect this
juxtaposition will repay analysis, and have asked that this be done.
The third extract was ghastly. The text here was all in capitals,
‘HAVE U SEEN THIS?’ and was of a soldier who had had a bullet through
his head, so that one eyeball goggled while the other was missing.
Those carrying the dead body were speaking in Sinhalese. I found the
whole sequence ghastly as well as strange, and I asked him whether this
was ‘some sort of trophy video and when it was taken and shown?”
Needless to say, there has been no response.
The first question to ask is, what is Siobhain McDonagh doing with a
young man like this, who triumphs over such pictures, while refraining
from sharing anything that could count as evidence for what he claims?
But I think there is a more serious question, which is, what is a young
man like this doing with a dangerous woman like Siobhain McDonagh?’
Video footage
For we can understand that youngsters were carried away by the Tigers
and their dangerous glamour. But, once the Tigers in Sri Lanka were
destroyed, it should have been possible for these boys to transfer their
energies to the welfare of Tamils, and not hanker after a renewal of
separatism through violence.
Unfortunately, they are out of touch with what goes on in Sri Lanka,
and so fall prey to continuing extremism, which is fuelled by those
British politicians who derived advantage from the previous connection.
Joan Ryan is now working for the Tiger rump. Siobhain McDonagh was
hand in glove with Channel 4 when they produced their film, and
doubtless introduced boys like this with their horrific video footage to
those who could manipulate and make use of it.
I feel I was right then to have prefaced my remarks at the House of
Commons with a reference to Conrad’s ‘Heart of Darkness’. A few people
read that as a reference to the Congo, and the ‘unspeakable’ horrors
Conrad describes as going on there. More see the title as referring to
Kurtz, who goes out with ideas and succumbs to the darkness that is
still placed out there. But Conrad himself ends the story with a
reference to the connections that are pervasive, and wind their way to
London.
As he showed in this other stories, where terrorism is corrosive,
those in the West should also be aware of how their involvement can
exacerbate the horror, the horror. |