Bakamuna Videe Basii, a play with substance
Namel WEERAMUNI
At a time when knowingly husbands, and unknowingly wives and
daughters of the same family get pregnant go for abortions at the same
time, and sometimes some other plays spew utter filth with invitations
to have sex with corpses on stage, it is a pleasure to see something
like Baka Muna Videe Basii that themes food for thought with substance.
Bakamuna returns to the Tower Hall
* One month after its sell-out debut run at the Tower Hall, Rajitha
Dissanayake’s latest political satire Bakamuna Veedi Basii (Owl in the
Street) returns to the Colombo stage by popular demand.
* Owl in the Street will be staged on September 15 at 3.30 pm and
6.45 pm. |
|
A scene
from Bakamuna |
Rajitha Dissanayake is one of the foremost and serious playwrights
that we have today. He is also one person who has to date attempted
totally on originals. This is a characteristic feature in his dramatic
carrier. A good playwright too he is with an imaginative directorial
precision. Rajitha is Baka Muna Videe Basii’s dramatist.
It is his latest play. It is interesting, entertaining, theatrically
rich, thought provoking and a success. The title signifies the crux what
it’s about. Baka Muna or the owl is a bird that does not see during the
day time. It becomes lively only when it is dark. The present day
society is the same, the playwright suggests.
What is happening is unseen but allowed to happen. By whom? That is
the question! Is it the public or the governance, or both? What he tells
the audience is a symbolically woven reflection. He fleshes out it with
a combination of stylized dramaturgical nuances all the way through a
mechanism of forceful and convincing acting by gearing an experienced
assemblage of a talented cast.
The playwright’s approach is indirect where the audience is driven to
reflect back as to where we live and how we live. The whole meaning is
hidden. What humbug we are in midst this social fabric, what a chaotic
mess it is, and how corrupt it is, is the message the playwright
attempts to unfold. Playwright perhaps may be scorning at the whole
society which is blind as to what is happening in the day today life of
the sum total social system that we live. We are just only cogs of that
corrupt social wheel we peddle. And this is for survival! We are blind
and cannot see what is truly happening around us because we are
struggling to survive. It’s the state of unease, but tolerated.
I find Rajitha a dissector of social dilemma leaving it for the
audience to solve it. He suggests no solutions but the reality of it’s
underneath operation, and its subtle imbalance. It’s an ongoing
operation that the successive governmental machineries have generated.
This is something that had taken root particularly perhaps since the
open economy market has come into being. It’s a social product where the
subjects have become a set of fighting cocks for gain and power
following the dictum of the survival of the fittest running on a
competitive spree.
This is what the playwright silhouettes of the present day society
with no morals or values, right or wrong. When I was watching the play
two playwrights came to my mind, Harold Pinter and Arnold Wesker,
because of two things, the style of the language, and the social irony
he imbues into his plays, besides the contemporary social relevance they
reveal.
A park is bulldozed to construct a shopping centre. The environment
is damned and ignored. The idea is to play out on the timber and to give
the contract of the construction of the shopping centre to the party
supporter in power. What repercussions and conflicts arise, how human
relationships change and how it dwindles into a blithe of hypocritical
excursion. What revolves around the play has to be judged only seeing
it.
As an overall production, the technique Rajitha invents is quite
mixed and varying. Yet it’s appealing. |