Acting envoy writes to Four Corner's programme
producer:
'Stop Channel 4 video telecast'
Ravi LADDUWAHETTY
Sri Lanka's acting High Commissioner to Australia Sashikala
Premwardhana has sent a letter of protest to Four Corner's Programme
executive producer Sue Spencer, on behalf of the Sri Lankan government,
calling on her to stop the telecast of the Channel Four Video, which was
to be telecast under the theme; "Killing Fields of Sri Lanka."
The acting High Commissioner's response has been following a request
from the television station for the proposed telecast of the video last
Saturday.
The Executive Summary and the key elements of the acting High
Commissioner's response to the television station have been:
* The programme content is completely biased and contains
unsubstantiated allegations against the government of Sri Lanka. The
views expressed in the film are without any guarantee of authenticity.
* The video footage of executions supposedly taken from a mobile
phone has not been verified as authentic.
* There is a possibility that this footage is from LTTE executions
that have been released to discredit the Sri Lankan government. The LTTE
regularly executed persons that had compromised its loyalty.
* The military uniforms of the individuals do not clearly establish
that these are Sri Lankan army personnel. The shots in the video clip
could well be treatment meted out by the LTTE in army uniform.
* The obvious bias of the programme is further illustrated by the
fact that a major portion of the video footage has been acquired from
the LTTE and its sources. The LTTE deliberately embedded its military
resources amongst the civilian population and it is very surprising that
none of the video footage in the Channel 4 programme shows any LTTE
military activity in the midst of the civilian population.
* The portrayal of the ground situation in the programme is as if the
LTTE never existed in the areas that were being filmed and the
government forces were deliberately targeting innocent civilians. This
is a clear distortion of facts and the ground reality that existed at
that time.
* Another aspect which did not get captured in the Channel 4
programme was that the LTTE was a formidable fighting force that has
developed a conventional military capability. Therefore, the LTTE was
not a passive bystander during this period. The Channel 4 programme
fails to present the offensive role played by the LTTE during this
period.
* At no point in the programme do they refer to the fact that the
LTTE used artillery shelling and refer to the possibility that the
shelling could be from the LTTE. This is a deliberate attempt to mislead
the viewers.
* The English translations of interviews with Tamil civilians were
deliberate distorted. For instance one such response of which the
literal English translation at best could be ("that means) they might
have attacked aiming the hospital (only"), but the text giving the
English translation of the statement that appeared in the screen was
"the hospital was targeted". Of the four or five Tamil civilians that
spoke in the programme none of them specifically mentioned that the Sri
Lankan army attacked them.
* UN Secretary-General spokesperson Martin Nesirky stated on June 21
that the Channel 4 had not correctly portrayed the visit of the UNSG to
Sri Lanka in May 2009. This clearly demonstrates the liberties taken by
the programme producers in twisting the truth to fit in with the agenda
of the programme.
The government of Sri Lanka through its High Commission in London has
repeatedly requested Channel 4 to provide a copy of the footage that was
aired by them to ascertain the authenticity of the footage. To date,
Channel 4 has not provided a copy of the footage that is in their
possession to the government.
* The government of Sri Lanka has responded to the technical note of
the UN Special Rapporteur on extrajudicial, summary or arbitrary
executions, Chistof Heyns, in relations to the authenticity of the
second, extended Channel 4 videotape, stating inter alia that the legal
efficacy of any report or publication is hinged upon the fundamental
requirement of impartiality and a complete lack of bias, having regard
to the rules of natural justice and that the process adopted in regard
to the publication of the videos and subsequent steps taken fall far
short of this requirement and is tainted with the fundamental vice of
bias and partiality.
* The fact that the contents of the video were not made available to
the Sri Lankan government by Channel 4 lends support to the suspicion
that the broadcast of the videos were for a collateral purpose.
* I urge ABC Four Comers not to air this programme and give coverage
to content which is unsubstantiated and which is without any guarantee
of authenticity. |