We will do it our way, not because of ICC !
The
International Cricket Council, guardians of the game, seems to have a
tendency to poke their fingers into other countries pies, neglecting and
ignoring their own shortcomings and problems.
The other day, they wanted three countries to become democratic and
hold elections so as to be free of government control. The countries
they were pointing fingers at were Sri Lanka, Pakistan and Bangladesh.
They were giving these countries two years to put things right.
It was nice to read Sri Lanka's Minister of Sport Mahindananda
Aluthgamage telling the ICC that Sri Lanka would not bow to ICC
pressure, but will hold elections next year in order to reinstate
democracy at Sri Lanka Cricket. In other words he was telling the ICC
"we will do it our way, we are not doing it because of the ICC, but
because we wanted to do it anyway!"
While we have no axe to grind with the ICC on this score, it is
pertinent to ask the ICC sheiks in Dubai, why is it that they can't get
India to agree to play to the Umpires Decision Referral System?
ICC powerless
The other nine Test playing countries are all in agreement and are
playing to the UDRS but not India. The toothless tiger image is tending
to haunt the ICC, because they are powerless to put their foot down and
tell India that they are governing the game and any laws or regulations
they make must be adhered to.
India is playing on the vagueness of the ICC, because they say for
the UDRS to be effective both playing teams must agree to play to this
system. India has said it and will continue to say no to the system and
the ICC is having egg on their faces.
What the ICC must do is tell the Indian Cricket Board, that they play
to the rules and regulations of the ICC. Probably the BCCI is more
powerful than the ICC and the sheiks in Dubai are scared stiff to be
hard on the Indians, fearing they might come second if they impose this
system on the BCCI.
So till the ICC can get their house in order, let them showcase to
the cricket world that they are "TOOTHLESS TIGERS".
Taming the Brit Lions
The Sri Lankan cricketers here in England have it in them to corner
and tame the British Lions, if they believe that they are second to none
when they front up to England in the remaining three NatWest one-day
Internationals.
At the time of writing, the Five match one day series is evenly
poised with each side having a win under their belts. England had luck
smiling their way when a storm saw that dreaded pair of Duckworth and
Lewis batting for them and bringing them victory at the Kia Oval in game
one.
The Sri Lankans made the initial mistake by winning the toss and
asking England to bat. With the rains reducing the game to a farce and
allowing only 32 overs a side from the original 50, the game as a
contest lost its appeal as England set Sri Lanka 232 to win, which was
impossible with the Lankans going down by a massive 110 runs.
If this style of slap ban cricket is to continue its appeal and draw
the fast dwindling spectators who are shunning' Test cricket, then it is
paramount that the full quota of 50 overs a side be played. It is also
essential for the weather to stay fine.
Bone chilling cold
Unfortunately for the Sri Lankans the bone chilling cold and the
rains prevailing here has gone to stall their natural flair for the
game. Like it is said in a folklore, everywhere that Mary went the Lamb
for sure to go, the cold and the rains have been following the Lankans
every where they played and stunting their play.
But came Friday and Headingley in Yorkshire and the Lankans had the
sun on their backs and they performed to capacity. Poor thinking by the
England skipper Alastair Cook when he won the toss and asked Sri Lanka
to bat on a wicket that was a batting paradise, the game was as good as
lost for England.
After two stupid run outs that of Dilshan and Chandimal, batting
champion Mahela Jayawardena took centre stage and provided the full
house of spectators with a stellar batting performance and gave the
England players a lesson in how to bat.
Jayawardena was simply fantastic. Concentration, skill, temperament,
technique and the strokes that matters in this style of game was on show
as he played for team and country and laid the foundation for a series
leveling victory that has kept Lanka hopes alive, with three more to go.
His career best 144 in 150 balls was mesmerizing.
Bad example
England's South Africa born Jade Dernbach a medium pacer who England
selectors think a lot about, but to me he is just one of those up and
down bowlers, became involved in a spat with Jayawardena one of the most
gentlemen cricketers playing the game today.
Dernbach apparently unable to stomach the Jayawardena battering
blocked the batsman's path when running and exchanged words and umpire
Billy Bowden was forced to step in. Derbach is a bad example.
Now this was uncalled for and only showed the ignorance and the
unsporting attitude of the medium pacer. Dernbach was only playing in
his second one-day international. True that fast bowlers are
temperamental and tend to lose their cool.
But Dernbach is only an up and downer and has no talent or promise in
him to act the ugly way he did. If he was a Keith Miller, Ray Lindwall,
a Fred Trueman, a Wesley Hall or a Charlie Griffith it could be
understood, because they were terrors and did not like being hit.
But Dernbach is pedestrian compared to the above mentioned pacemen,
and it will do the England think tanks good to tell him to cool off and
concentrate on holding his place in an England team that is lacking star
quality cricketers for this style of the game.
[email protected]
|