Moulding Sri Lanka’s graduates into leaders: suggestion for National
Service
Shenali Waduge
As customary there is much hue and cry over the grand initiative to
provide a phased out three-week leadership training for 22,000
undergraduates with food, lodging (separate for males and females) and
attire that will include 171 periods of learning. So when a government
in a country that has been enslaved by numerous aid packages given often
with agreement to structurally adjust state services continues to
provide free education upto tertiary level and is presently allocating
Rs 200 million for an exercise that would really change the mind set of
university entrants for the better through a series of well-planned and
designed programmes, why would anyone choose to complain and on what
grounds?
In reality all Sri Lankans should show gratitude to the state and a
programme of National Service as done in many parts of the world would
be perfect and timely.
Corporate world
The government spends 2.8 percent of GDP on education which covers
free school uniforms, free breakfast for students in underprivileged
schools, free textbooks from Grade One to Grade 11. Yet youth
unemployment is high and poses a major problem. Less than six percent
gain admission to one of 15 universities in Sri Lanka. Graduates are
unemployed because there is little demand for the degrees they have
completed.
They need to then have a set of skills that would help them absorb
themselves into industries and sectors that they could find employment
in and with time be able to qualify further as well. Even though the
degrees may not match market requirements, undergraduates need to at
least learn the soft skills needed to eventually fit into the corporate
world.
Despite a literacy of 92.3 percent the majority amongst us find
emerging leaders and adults of the future lacking what is essential for
the corporate world. That responsibility must first fall upon all
successive governments and their lacklustre education policies,
academics who have not been initiative enough to project a force upon
policy makers to enforce the need to change curricular to suit the
changing needs of the world, students themselves for not realizing the
real status of affairs and attempting themselves to come out of the
tendency to fall into the vacuum that politically motivated students
devise for them.
Student unions
Politically motivated student unions would like students to be
failures for it would mean a strength to their numbers and their
demands. Frustrated unemployed graduates would help to inflate their
political will amongst the masses and against a government that is the
major reason why the present students unions are opposing the leadership
training.
The seniors of these student unions most of whom have been
consistently failing their exams yet hold these portfolios on the
strength of their ability to push their weight amongst the freshers and
with the backing they receive from political parties. Moreover, given
the mental torture most university entrants are subject to no sooner
they enter university straight from the innocence of their homes, the
three weeks of training would be a welcome departure! This initiative is
obviously a subtle way of overcoming the ragging problem and the
commitment of university authorities to end ragging.
Economic growth
Purely because the residential training is located throughout 28
military facilities (18 Army, two Naval, two Air Force, four cadet and
Police camps) around Sri Lanka is a very lame and unfair argument to use
by those who are presently opposing the initiative. We should instead
think positively since we are in agreement that present day graduates do
not make the mark of suitability for corporate employment and the
corporate sector is what steers the engine of economic growth. We cannot
produce students just to show off their qualifications. They must be
able to utilize this not only for themselves but the betterment of the
nation.
Can any of these university entrants be able to obtain training in
leadership skills, conceptual skills, strategic management skills,
conflict resolution skills, human skills, psychology, social etiquettes,
time management, sports, laws pertaining to the country and personal
hygiene, without paying for it if they wanted to learn these to further
enhance their ability to gain employment? How much would a private
institute charge for these subject matter?
English and IT skills
What’s more, the Ministry of Higher Education has plans to offer
laptops on a pay later basis, WiFi facility in university premises and
dongals to students while special programmes in English and IT is also
expected to be conducted for the freshers. Therefore, why would anyone
want to deny these youth the chance to learn something that would be of
benefit to moulding their personalities on the one hand and eventually
using these to uplift the status of service once in employment? This
initiative is something that is much in need of to help them breakaway
from the psychological pressures that most students suffer from since
the majority does suffer an inferiority complex due to their humble
upbringing.
Therefore, at the outset we must understand that we belong to the
global village where international trade will continue to dictate how we
function. Though education is provided free, only parents will know the
toil they go through to ensure that their children receive sufficient
learning to compete in schools. Today, the business of education has
made sure a substantial amount of parents’ earnings go towards tuition
in the ultimate desire to have one’s child continue to pursue higher
learning.
This is so even in rural Sri Lanka. For the affluent the means to
obtain foreign education has been a preferred option. The marking
methodology ensures that the majority of students that eventually enter
universities come from humble homes. In fact over 80 percent of
university entrants are from beyond towns and cities yet as proud
parents they would somehow try to find means to ensure their children
are sent something extra as pocket money.
University students
Most of these students lack even basic English knowledge skills,
other social traits would also be lacking. Apart from what is taught
free they would be financially unable to bridge their weaknesses unless
corporates through their corporate responsibility programmes and other
such private or non-government initiatives are made available to them.
These programmes however cannot entertain all university students and
are not consistent as a lot of financial commitment is involved.
The general objection is that the training is in military camps and
thus the assumption that the training given is military training. This
is certainly an unfair and unjust assumption and the course syllabus
itself will reveal how customized the course is to suit university
entrants with nothing close to the training a military recruit will
receive.
With the military often maintaining a distance from civil life it is
naturally for anyone to feel a sense of fear nevertheless we have seen
for ourselves the manner in which the military today stands transformed
from how it had been perceived and how it had functioned previously.
Anyone stopped by the military at a security post will immediately see
the difference in the courtesies shown by military personnel as against
police personnel! Holding the training in these military centres makes
logistical sense as these centres are all well equipped, they have the
necessary facilities and expertise. The programme is very similar to
that which is commercially conducted through outbound training though
there is very limited physical effort in the present programme and
certainly not what military personnel have to undergo.
Practical experiences
A similar exercise had been conducted for the Sri Jayawardenapura
University with the collaboration of the army with much success.
Everyone needs to accept that this is a remarkable move, it is timely
and farsighted and should be considered to extend beyond the proposed
three weeks. It is not difficult to comprehend that apart from the soft
skills training through the personality and leadership development
programme many other changes need to take place in the university
system.
Curriculums need to match the contemporary world, resources to enable
new technology, practical experiences combined to theoretical study,
departing from the trend to memorize and write answers as encouraged by
most lecturers who insist their tutorials are repeated word for word,
lecturers need to continuously upgrade their own knowledge, assessment
system must give more weight to application, medium of instruction where
possible needs to be in English, library services and IT access need to
be made available to all and text books should include home-examples are
just a few that is vocalized by most university students.
Tuition fees
Sri Lankans and in particular university students themselves need to
understand that education is an expensive investment. For a developing
country such as Sri Lanka to continue to provide free education upto
tertiary level is commendable. Education in fee-levying countries is
very expensive and increases annually. In US tuition fees vary from $
5,000 to $ 30,000 per year (about $ 9,000 for a resident student). In
Canada average tuition fees are $ 9,000 while international tuition is
$25,500.
EU countries charge 5,000 euros to 8,000 euros, while in the UK, a
citizen would have to spend on an average Sterling Pounds 3,000. In
France, which has 1.5m students all are public and no tuition fees and
undergraduate enrolment is just 165. Lecturers are civil servants.
German universities charge 1,000 euros as enrolment fee annually (for EU
and non-EU countries) while in Australia free education was given until
1988, but today full time and post-graduate degrees cost between AUD
10,000 to 20,000 per year.
Free education
It is perhaps now opportune to create a system whereby Sri Lankans
can show gratitude to the state for providing free education. Compulsory
or Voluntary National Service (different name tags will be used in
different countries) are very much in vogue and provide those serving
the nation a means to show their gratitude as well as feel they too have
done their share for the nation.
In a time where much is being spoken about reconciliation and reform,
it would be prudent for policy makers to think about drafting a scheme
that would entail all graduates and non-graduates to serve the Nation
either voluntarily or through a compulsory scheme (for a year with a
stipend) and divide the national service in to categories that would
cover the following areas: health, education, environment,
entrepreneurship, national security, administration, transportation...so
that key areas are covered and the youth will be able to provide
excellent leadership in these areas.
Such an initiative would create a National Service Obligation because
it is wrong to believe that living in a free society entails little or
no obligations. Whatever rights we have should not predate our social
contract, our rights are only a privilege of living society and not an
entitlement, which means we need to contribute to society and creating a
national service system would be another way to change the mindset of
the people and start building up our nation towards prosperity. |