‘The demon is not as terrifying as we may imagine’
Wasantha Priya Ramanayake Translated into English by
A A M Nizam
“It was the foreign policy of India since the late 1990s to accept
that the Tiger outfit as a terrorist organization and that the Sri
Lankan government cannot avoid waging a war with that organization. They
also held the view that moral support should be provided to Sri Lanka to
find a political solution to provide powers to the Tamil people.
J Jayalalitha |
“At the same time the Indian government explained that they
proscribed the Tiger outfit and decided to oppose that organization not
merely because they assassinated their Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi but
because it was a terrorist organization. The Indian government believed
that as long as the ethnic problem prevailed in Sri Lanka it would
revive separatist sentiments in Tamil Nadu State.”
Tiger terrorism
The Indian daily Hindu thus clearly stated the Indian stance on Sri
Lanka in a special article published on October 26, 2008. The article
says, “The Tamil Nadu politicians display different attitudes about
India and Sri Lanka. They think, rather than saving Sri Lanka from Tiger
terrorism, it is important to save India from the Islamic militants of
Kashmir. They do not see the destruction suffered by Sri Lanka for over
20 years under Tiger terrorism. It was the Tiger outfit that spread
terrorism in South Asia.”
Similarly, this is how The Hindufigured out the strategies of the
Tiger outfit then. “What the Tiger outfit and its supporters attempt are
to inflame a massive wave of chauvinism among the Tamils and to
instigate the Indian government against the Sri Lankan government.
Therefore, the pronouncements being made by the Tamil Nadu politicians
about Sri Lanka are very attractive but highly deceptive.”
The Hindu at that time (Oct 26, 2008) also gave a fine description of
how India changed its foreign policy after a period of one decade in
accordance with the traditional politics of the Tamil Nadu.
Corruption and malpractices issues
This Indian policy is valid even today. It is same with Tamil Nadu as
well. In order to attain power, it was not the first time that the party
of Jayalalitha, the A.I.D.M.K, utilized the Northern and Eastern
Province problem of Sri Lanka. But this time she gained power not based
purely on the Sri Lankan issue, but on the corruption and malpractices
issues raised against the Karunanidhi’s state government. As it was
proudly claimed by the NDTV television channel, politics in Tamil Nadu
are like a ‘See-saw’. It goes up and down. If Karunanidhi gets a turn
the next is for Jayalalitha’s. Although the Sri Lankan issue did not
make much impact in the recent election, it could have been one of the
factors. It may be the reason Chief Minister Jayalalitha made reference
to Sri Lanka in her maiden speech.
M Karunanidhi |
However, a country deals with another country not in accordance with
the policies of state governments. They deal with each other based on
the policies of central governments. Merely because of this it cannot be
underestimated that the voice being raised by Jayalalitha as the Chief
Minister of Tamil Nadu is not that important. There is no dispute that
the support received from India also helped in Sri Lanka’s victory in
the war. During that period it was because India was backing Sri Lanka
that our country was able to avoid interference by the Western
countries, especially by America.
The cordial relations the Mahinda Rajapaksa government had with India
also helped in this regard. When the Wadamarachchi operation was being
carried forward then, what Rajiv Gandhi told President J R Jayewardene
was “your military option will not work”. The packets of dhal were
dropped subsequently, the following day. This time Prime Minister
Manmohan Singh did not say such a thing to President Mahinda Rajapaksa.
But we do not know what he said through the Narayanans and Menons. The
Sri Lankan forces victoriously moved forward against the LTTE. It is
here we find the difference. It was because of the friendship that
existed between the Mahinda Rajapaksa government and the Indian
government.
Political solution
In the meantime, India cannot escape from the act of pressuring Sri
Lanka towards a political solution. Especially it has become so because
of the Tamil Nadu situation. At the same time President Mahinda
Rajapaksa also accepted the necessity of a political solution. He held
this view even at the time of fighting the war.
President Mahinda Rajapaksa while fighting the LTTE at that time was
even prepared to hold talks with the LTTE. The ‘Walk the Talk’
discussion programme he held with the NDTV was a fine example of this.
Excerpts of this discussion are given below:
President Mahinda Rajapaksa:
“I told them let us discuss without any conditions. Let them fight
but I am prepared to hold discussions with them”.
NDTV - Shekar Gupta:
“Let me get it clarified. What you say is that you can hold talks
even without a ceasefire?”
President Mahinda Rajapaksa:
“I am doing so because the country needs peace.”
President Mahinda Rajapaksa who held such a stance then, could not
have any reason to delay a political solution that could bring long-term
peace for the country.
“My government is ready for a political solution. It should be based
on devolution of power, ensuring democracy and politics and all rights
of our Tamil brethren, including language, within an undivided Sri
Lanka” - President Mahinda Rajapaksa (The Hindu 02.11.2008)
“What I expect is to reach the final result and then provide a name
for it. My final result will be maximum power devolution within a
unitary Sri Lanka” (Extract from the speech made at 2006 Asian
Association).
Accordingly, the stand of the President and the government is very
clear. But it needs time. It cannot be done to please someone’s urgency.
It is now only two years after ending the 30-year conflict over the
ethnic problem that existed for over 50 years. An experienced leader
will never attempt to burn his fingers by providing solutions in a
hurry.
The Lessons Learnt and Reconciliation Commission is to get guidelines
about this. Even before the report of this Commission is released
President Mahinda Rajapaksa has commenced talks with the Tamil National
Alliance. “According to the statements made by the President locally and
internationally, he is ready for devolution of power”. (- M A
Sumanthiran - TNA MP).
None of these things can be done in a hurry. An agreement can be
reached by discussions with the Tamil National Alliance, and other Tamil
and Sinhala political parties. Some believe the new solution could be
something beyond the 13th Amendment, rectifying the lapses in this
Amendment. “A step ahead of the 13th Amendment” is a topic now being
discussed in the political arena. The 13th Amendment is a provision that
already exists in the constitution. The President is legally obliged to
follow it. Similarly he is strongly determined not to fulfil the demands
of the Tigers.
Likewise, we find that the Indian central government and Tamil Nadu
politicians want to expedite the political solution. All their
statements seem to be to pressurize over this. Even the Darusman Report
seems to be something to expedite this matter. Human rights violations
do occur in all wars. It is a common factor. Even Tamil Nadu is aware of
it.
In the meantime, we cannot expect that India would attempt to get a
form of power devolution exceeding the Indian system or a form that
would fulfil Tigers’ aspirations. It is because a system that segments
Sri Lanka will not be acceptable to India. The reason is that the
separatist movements in India would take advantage of it. India would
also be conscious of new political developments in Tamil Nadu. India
cannot forget Sri Lanka by creating serious problems within Tamil Nadu.
There cannot be an understanding by Sri Lanka about these problems. Sri
Lanka too will need some time for a successful political solution. It is
India’s responsibility to manage the ‘Tamil Nadu Amma’ in a way that
would not harm the existing cordial relations between the two countries.
The reason for this is that Sri Lanka is an independent country. India
also knows the importance of Sri Lanka on the global level. Therefore,
demon is not as terrifying as we may imagine. The Amma is also now
mature in politics. It is not necessary to teach her about ‘regional
politics’ and ‘national politics’. Whatever said and done, while in the
opposition to get power, will not work when ruling a state government.
Therefore, she knows that practical performance is not as easy as some
pronouncements.
This article was first published in a Sinhala daily |