Accusations based on strange hopes
Prof. Rajiva Wijesinha, MP
I have dealt at some length with the serious allegations made by the
Darusman Panel, and my detailed responses have now been collected into a
book. This will be available later this week at the International Book
House, 151A Dharmapala Mawata, Colombo 7. It is entitled ‘See No Good,
Hear No Good, Speak No Good: the perversions of the Darusman Panel’.
However there still remains much to be said. I have rarely come
across such a slipshod and vulgar piece of work. The manner in which all
rules of language as well as evidence are traduced to put the Sri Lankan
government in the dock is positively disgusting. Though in the end what
happens will depend, not on facts or justice, but on the political
predilections of more powerful nations, I hope anyone studying this
exercise will realize that the panellists should not be taken seriously.
It will be a travesty of academic standards and integrity if they are
used again for the lucrative political jobs that the international
community throws up with predictable regularity.
Secret locations
A startling example of the manner in which prejudice trumps decency
was apparent in the footnote to para 98 of the report, which is all
about the manner in which the LTTE tormented civilians during the last
days. It records that the LTTE ‘continued to prevent civilians from
leaving the area, ensuring their continued presence as a human buffer.
It forced civilians to help build military installations and
fortifications or undertake other forced labour. It also intensified its
practice of forced recruitment, including of children, to swell their
dwindling ranks. As LTTE recruitment increased, parents actively
resisted, and families took increasingly desperate measures to protect
their children from recruitment. They hid their children in secret
locations or forced them into early-arranged marriages. (52) LTTE cadre
would beat relatives or parents, sometimes severely, if they tried to
resist the recruitment.’
But after that the panel cannot resist sniping at government too, in
a manner that seems to take away from the outrageous behaviour of the
LTTE. I believe this is termed ‘holding the balance’, which several
ruffians pretended to do, so as to equate terrorists with a democratic
government. Footnote 52 declares that ‘Early marriage was perceived to
protect girls and boys from LTTE recruitment, as the LTTE preferred to
recruit unmarried youth. Early marriage is a threat to the health and
development of young women. Later, in the IDP camps, parents also hoped
that marriage would protect girls who had reached puberty from sexual
violence by government forces.’
Sexual violence
This last statement is quite bizarre. No evidence is provided. It is
part of a relentless attempt to accuse forces of sexual violence in the
camps, when absolutely no suggestion was made of any serious problem at
the time by UNHCR, which was constantly being asked to substantiate
vague rumours.
In one week, following what seemed harsh general accusations by some
proven liars working for UNHCR, after I asked for specifics, I was given
three, by Elizabeth Tan, who was in-charge of protection and was
basically honest. One was an instance in which a soldier was supposed to
have followed a woman IDP into a toilet but ‘the girl screamed’ and a
camp volunteer came to her rescue. Another incident was of an uncle
abusing a girl while the army encouraged him by giving him liquor and
turning off the lights. The third was of reports of prostitution at
Pompaimadu.
This was the substance of the allegations. It was also mentioned that
incidents of sexual and gender based violence near the river had been
discussed. What appeared in the report however was of deaths, which were
later transformed by a journalist into 14 women found with their throats
cut.
The journalist later confessed that his source, which in response to
my questioning he seemed to indicate was working for the UN, was
unreliable, and he would not use it again.
The three incidents and a general discussion about the situation near
the river was all Elizabeth could cite. The more lurid description in
the report that had been issued was false, as was the claim made by the
head of UNHCR that the report had been issued after discussion with
government. This was not true, and I proved it by cross-questioning the
girls who had provided the information in front of the army official
they claimed they had informed.
War crimes
However the Head of UNHCR was nervous of these girls, one of whom was
called Pelosi, and whom he told me was important because she was related
to Nancy Pelosi, then Speaker of the US House. I have no idea whether
this was true, or whether the girl got her job through such connections
and then abused them to lie to her superiors. But it was clear that
accuracy was not her strong suit.
It is such rumours that the panel seems to have decided to present as
gospel in its report. It makes no reference to the reports which UNHCR
presented to us, in response to our request, having held them close to
its chest earlier, contrary to the manner in which the UN is supposed to
function. The purpose of spending large amounts on what is termed
protection is to ensure remedial action, and there is certainly much
recorded of discussion with government officials. But it now seems that
they hoarded the very serious cases to trot out two years later to
promote charges of war crimes.
|