Language learning and people’s aspiration
Following are extracts from submissions made
to the LLRC by Sunimal Fernando. Second part of this article was
published yesterday
The Sinhala, Tamil and Muslim respondents in the Northern and Eastern
Provinces gave equal partiality to the improvement of job opportunities
through proficiency in another language as much as their choice for
national integration.
This stance could be supported by the fact that the people in the
Northern and Eastern Provinces having been somewhat remote due to
various factors that restricted interaction with other parts of the
country, which had rendered them monolinguals, may strongly feel in an
environment of peace and reconciliation the need to learn the other
national language in an effort to improve their job opportunities.
|
Sunimal
Fernando |
The most interesting line of reasoning from among the responses was
the fact that proficiency in the other national language would
facilitate the exchange of ideas across the borders of ethnicity and
language.
This would clearly substantiate one of the key objectives of a
trilingual initiative, which should be to develop the two national
languages to be used in discourse, debate and discussion and the
development of a culture of knowledge in the local languages.
The responses provide further acceptance of the initiative by
recognising the fact that our two national languages can also be
developed to a status that would enable them to serve as a vehicle for
dialogue, development and dissection of modern thought and knowledge
other than in the English language.
Higher education
Proficiency in another national language was considered advantageous
for purposes of higher education as well.
It would augur well for the initiative that the respondents did not
feel pressured socially to acquire proficiency in the other national
language, which allows them the space to learn and acquire competence in
their own time and according to their ability.
Over 90 percent of all respondents belonging to different categories
and representing different provinces in the country had convincingly
supported the need for children to be proficient in English. The major
reasons for acquiring proficiency in English was to improve job
opportunities and for better higher education.
All school students (100 percent) that had taken part in the survey
had expressed the need for proficiency in English for purposes of higher
education. Although English has not been highly regarded as contributing
towards national integration, it nevertheless still retained its
long-standing significance as a language of social status and prestige
among Sri Lankans as confirmed by the survey results.
The socio-linguistic survey makes evident that people do want to be
proficient in English, but the majority do not fanatically yearn for the
proficiency exhibited by a native speaker of the English language.
An eagerness for acquiring a native speaker like proficiency in
English is not a majority endorsement as demonstrated in other queries.
Over 56 percent of Sinhala respondents in the Western, Southern and
Central Provinces want to acquire native speaker-like proficiency in
English, although only 37 percent of their Sinhala counterparts in the
Northern and Eastern Provinces wished to have the same level of
proficiency. The majority of Tamil respondents namely 55 percent and 61
percent in majority Sinhala speaking provinces and in the Northern and
Eastern Provinces respectively wanted to acquire the language competence
of a native speaker, while the need to acquire the same degree of
proficiency among Muslims in all provinces was relatively higher than
the other two groups surveyed; accordingly 66 percent and 75 percent of
Muslims in the majority Sinhala speaking provinces and in the Northern
and Eastern Provinces wished to acquire native speaker like proficiency
in the English language.
Language skills
Very few respondents wanted to limit competency in the English
language to the spoken form only; majority of respondents expressed the
need to become skilled beyond the mere ability to speak the English
language.
The ability to understand the English language was on the whole
average for the Sinhala respondents in all provinces (58 percent and 54
percent respectively), while only 35 percent and 38 percent from the
majority Sinhala speaking provinces and from the Northern and Eastern
Provinces respectively claimed to have a good grasp of understanding the
English language 60 percent of the Tamils in the Western, Central and
Southern Provinces possessed a high degree of familiarity with the
language, although the same could not be said of Tamils surveyed in the
North and the East, whose majority (56 percent) had only an average
understanding of the English language.
University lecturers
The Tamil respondents in the majority Sinhala speaking provinces
continue to impress their command in English language skills through
their excellent ability to speak, read and write (56 percent, 54 percent
and 56 percent).
The Muslims in all provinces had almost an equal number of
respondents possessing a good and average familiarity in their ability
to understand the language.
Although the ability to speak, read and write the English language
had been recorded as average for most categories of respondents in all
provinces (except the Tamils in the majority Sinhala speaking
Provinces), it nevertheless indicates that English as a second language
has been taught across Sri Lanka, because even if the ability to speak,
read and write English may be average on the whole, still more than 40
percent of the respondents in all the provinces had an average
acquaintance of the spoken, reading and written form of the English
language.
Among the respondents who claimed to possess a high degree of
familiarity in understanding, speaking, reading and writing the English
language were professional service personnel and university lecturers,
which provide focus for all future English language initiatives in
determining where interventions ought to be directed at.
The English language was viewed as useful for social mobility across
the board.
English was also considered important in obtaining employment in
business transactions and a high endorsement for the benefits of English
to acquire modern knowledge. English has been identified as being useful
in getting work done in government offices and for travel within the
country and outside the country.
Thus English can continue to play a pivotal role in supporting the
process of acquiring modern knowledge developed outside the country,
which could be converted into the two national languages of the country
to be used by all citizens in their various pursuits and could lead to
the development of various schools of thought, discussion and discourse.
Respondents in general have had no objections in using mixed
languages for communication and agreed that it made the process easier
and although a small number of respondents felt that one's language is
likely to be damaged if certain aspects were loaned from other
languages, over 50 percent of all respondents in all provinces disagreed
with the notion that a language will get distorted owing to borrowing
from another language.
It is evident that there is a mixed perspective and perception of the
teachers' role in encouraging the children to mix languages.
Although over 50 percent of Tamil and Muslim respondents did not
object to teachers encouraging children to mix languages, Sinhala
respondents on the whole disapproved of teachers following such a
possibility.
The peoples' desire to maintain the purity of any language is evident
in the fact that all respondents largely agreed that there was no harm
in mixing languages in speech but not when it comes to the written form.
Moreover there was unanimous agreement that languages should not be
mixed in formal situations. Concluded
|