Decade ending 2010 - a reflection:
Beginning of a new era
Prof Bernard W Dissanayake
As the year 2010 wears out it marks the completion of the first
decade of the 21st Century. This decade is proved a momentous one for
Sri Lanka for number of reasons. First and foremost, it marked the
ending of the terrorist civil war that raged for 30 long years and
bringing peace finally to the country, under the effective political
leadership of President Mahinda Rajapaksa.
President Mahinda Rajapaksa |
He was elected the fifth executive President of Sri Lanka in November
2005 and was able to defeat the LTTE terrorists in just three years,
declaring war on terror, which others have failed fighting for decades.
President Mahinda Rajapaksa brought peace to the country thereby. His
re-election as the President for the second term this year is indeed
epoch-making in the political history of Sri Lanka.
Creating history
Going before people two years prior to the due date, Mahinda
Rajapaksa was re-elected as President in January 2010 with a massive
majority, creating history in Presidential elections. He defeated the
Opposition backed rival contestant, Sarath Fonseka, the retired Army
Commander who had served under the President himself.
Sarath Fonseka’s decision to contest the President and hopefully
defeat him in style was concocted and backed by a powerful political
lobby both within and out side Sri Lanka, which opposed President
Mahinda Rajapaksa to continue as President of Sri Lanka. This lobby in
fact tried to stop President winning the war on terror. It had agents
strongly positioned in media services, NGOs and in political parties,
hell-bent on changing public opinion and views and politics of people
and their parties influencing in their favour and promoting separatism
in Sri Lankan politics.
The days a head of last Presidential election January 2010 this lobby
put into operation a massive propaganda blitz against Mahinda Rajapaksa
and his administration, alleging massive corruption and human rights
violations.
Public issues
The Opposition candidate Sarath Fonseka directed attacks against the
very government and the army, he served, alleging serious war crimes.
This is a most unethical thing for any Army officer to engage in.
Also a weekend newspaper linked to a rejected political leader was
carrying out propaganda against the government, publishing gossip
columns on security related matters and foreign relations pertaining to
Sri Lanka.
This newspaper, well known for taking position to support its own
clan of politicians and taking strong anti-national stand on public
issues is now supporting the political rejects of Sri Lanka in recent
years. The general public well aware of the forces at work on national
issues now recognized the true leadership for the country after the end
of terrorist war.
Stable government
The trend of voting for the President Mahinda Rajapaksa in the
re-election in January 2010 continued well into the Parliamentary
election of April 2010, when contrary to all expectations, the
government received almost two-third majority in the House.
The government’s strength in Parliament no doubt acted as a magnet to
attract few more crossovers from the Opposition giving the government
more than two-third majority. Thus Sri Lanka gained a very strong and a
stable government for necessary change management, most required in the
present state of the country.
Momentous year |
* Ending of
30 years of terrorism
* President’s effective leadership brought peace
* President re-elected with thumping majority
* Govt receives two-third majority in Parliament
* Adoption of 18th Amendment strengthened people’s choice
* Dawning of massive development era
*Better future for younger generation |
Ending a prolonged terrorist war in the North and bring peace to the
country after the 30 years is no joke. With peace, the development
prospects for the country are excellent and the country need a strong
political leadership backed by a strong government to address many
national issues that had lingered for many decades, unresolved, some
even dating back from 1940s. The adaptation of 18th Amendment further
strengthened people’s political choice in selecting future leaders they
wish to have, for Sri Lanka not constrained by Constitutional
provisions.
In all these developments, coming into being in a sequence of events
since November 2005 augurs well for our nation. Looking back over the
years since independence one can be justified in arguing that we, as a
country has come of age, learning as we matured politically, from the
world around us and from events within the country itself, how to
weather storms, both political and economic and not merely surviving but
coming out as a great winner. Hence perhaps we earned the wonder of
South Asia: let us pride ourselves for a moment.
New era
What we have gone through as a people in the last 30 odd years,
suffering in fear and uncertainty, most probably under weak political
leaders, in the past, has been a fact of life, though a very sad one
indeed. The decade that ends in 2010 is most significant, both in
direction and context and would certainly be recorded in the history of
our county as a beginning of a new era.
The election of Mahinda Rajapaksa as the Head of State and the
executive President, was no doubt the main difference that brought this
change to our country. It is indeed a change, that most people dreamt
but only very few thought it would ever come within half a decade.
The fact that this massive change came with Mahinda Rajapaksa and his
strong leadership quality and commitment for achievement, was something
that happened for the good luck of the country and its people living
today yearning for peace and development during their life time.
The children of today would be the most fortunate to live greatly
enriched life that Mother Sri Lanka would see in the great
transformation that would unfold in the decades that lie a head of us. |