Measuring performance in financial services organizations
The Balance Scorecard is a strategic planning and management system
that is used extensively in business organizations worldwide to align
business activities to the vision and strategy of the organization. The
Balance Scorecard improves internal and external communication, and
monitors organizations’ performance against strategic goals.
|
B W S
Premaratne
Chartered Marketeer CIM (UK) |
Balance Scorecard is a multi-source business performance management
system based on the most critical organizational measures. These major
components are named as ‘Key Performance Indicators’ (KPIs) and include
the following: financial perspective, customer perspective, internal
business process, and learning and growth measures.
Traditional performance evaluation systems provided information about
past financial performance, and were incapable of offering information
about future performance. BSC (Balance Scorecard) gives attention to the
importance of strategic measurement systems including both non financial
and financial measures. BSC also lets managers see whether they have
improved in one area at the expense of another.
Perspectives
The BSC suggests that there are four perspectives in measuring
organizational performance. They are:
Customer perspective: How do customers see us? Recent management
philosophy has shown an increasing realization of the importance of
customer focus and customer satisfaction in any business. The customer
is the most valuable asset in the business organization. If the
customers are not satisfied, they will eventually find other
organizations that will meet their needs. These are leading indicators
(performance drivers). Poor performance from this customer perspective
is thus an indicator of future decline; even though the current
financial position of the company may look healthy. Customer
satisfaction, the customer retention ratio, the size of the customer
base, and the frequency of complaints are some of the indicators of the
customer perspective.
The learning and growth perspective: Through learning and growth, we
can continue to improve and create value for the customer. This
perspective includes employee training and corporate cultural attitudes
related to both individual and corporate self improvement. In a
knowledge-worker organization, people are the main repository and
resource of knowledge and skills.
In the current climate of rapid technological change. It is becoming
necessary for workers to be in a continuous state of learning and
growth.
‘Learning is more than training’. It also includes on-going mentoring
and tutorship within the organization, as well as ease of communication
among workers that allows them to readily get help on a problem when it
is needed.
Business process perspective: This prospective facilitates business
performance through internal processing improvement. Customer-based
measures are important , but they must be translated into measures of
what the company must do internally to meet its customers’ expectations.
Afterwards, excellent customer performance -derives from process,
decisions, and actions occurring throughout an organization (Kaplan and
Norton, 1992). Metrics based on this perspective allow the Managers to
know how well their business is running , and whether its products and
services conform to customer requirements. These metrics should be
carefully designed by those who know these processes .
Financial perspective: How do we look to shareholders? Financial
performance measures indicate whether the company’s strategy,
implementation and execution are contributing to the bottom-line
improvement. Financial objectives are typically related to profitability
measures, for example, by operating income, Return On Capital Employed (ROCE),
or more recently EVA (Economic Value Added). Alternative financial
objectives can be rapid sales growth or generation of cash.
Balance scorecard framework for financial services organisations
Objectives: Within each perspective, objectives identify what needs
to be done in order to achieve the overall mission. They answer the
following questions: 1What must we do (from each perspective) to achieve
the overall mission? 2.What is most important (from each perspective) to
achieving the overall mission? Measures: Measures provide a way to
determine how an organization is doing in achieving the objectives
within the perspectives, and in turn the overall mission (Hubbard,
2007). They are the most ‘actionable’ component in the Scorecard. These
measures help answer the question: How do we know how well we’re doing
in achieving our objectives, and in turn our overall mission?
Targets: Targets are set for each measure to monitor and evaluate the
progress towards the objective (Hubbard, 2007).
Initiatives: These are the set of activities that are planned within
each perspective in order to achieve the targets set for each measure.
Application of BSC in financial services organizations
Most of the financial organizations in Sri Lanka are still using only
the traditional financial measures such as return on capital employed (ROCE),
earning per share (EPS), and budgeted versus actual in measuring
organizational performance.
A company could measure performance based on how much money the
company makes. To a certain extent, it is right. Financial measures are
the critical ‘bottom-line results’ that companies must deliver to
survive. But, if the top management of the company only focuses on the
financial health of the organization, several unfortunate consequences
may arise. One of these is that financial measures are ‘lagging
indicators (outcomes)’ rather than ‘leading indicators (performance
drivers)’. This means that these indicators may have happened months or
years before, and may not be controllable in the present. Being in a
plane falling from the sky is not the time to realize that you should
have done routine maintenance. Another of the consequences of just
focusing on financial measures is that the company is not
customer-oriented. Decisions may be made that help your organization
financially, but hurt the long-term relationships with customers; the
customers may eventually reduce purchases or leave all together. As an
example: you may have gone to get your car serviced, but later found out
that you have paid too much. The outcome is you may never go back to
that service station again.
The management of a financial organization needs to be aware of
inter-play of numerous factors that can impact the organization’s
performance. An organization is required to take care of these numerous
factors and devise a plan to attain a ‘balance growth’. Key performance
indicators are set on two major aspects in a financial organization -
lending and borrowing, The key performance indicators are instituted to
streamline the operations and goals of the company.
Various factors can be tracked by the company’s BSC: financial
indicators such as the ROCE, capital adequacy, the movement of profit
and cost margins can all be used to measure the success of the company.
Financial organizations need to keep track of their assets and risks. A
financial organization’s Balance Scorecard could be used to assess
whether or not the company is maximizing their resources or taking too
much risk. BSC could provide this information easily.
With so many uses for a BSC, the company would be able to track its
own progress and focus on giving better service. Once the company knows
where to concentrate their strengths, and lessen their weaknesses, it is
much easier for the management and marketing of target opportunities.
BSC framework will guide the company to set the four perspectives,
measures and criteria, in order to assess measuring the organization’s
performance. Unlike other organizations, a financial organization is
required to ‘watch their steps’ in an extremely careful manner. This is
to keep an account of the way things and operations have been
progressing in the company.
Building a balanced scorecard
The process of building a Balanced Scorecard can be divided into
seven steps that can be categorized into three phases:
Phase 1: The Strategic Foundation
Step 1: The organization must be aligned around a clear and concise
strategy. The strategy is what feeds the Balanced Scorecard. Therefore a
strategic plan needs to be constructed at this stage. This includes the
identification of the specific objectives that tell people what to do
and a set of targets to convey what is expected. For example, a
strategic objective may be to decrease the loan/lease cycle time by 20%
over the next 12 months through more decentralized approval systems.
This step is at the heart of Balanced Scorecards as the whole
organization needs to be aligned and rallied around strategic objectives
and targets set at this stage.
Step 2: The major strategic areas on which the organization must
focus are then determined. It is important to restrict the organization
to select areas of key importance for strategic success; otherwise it
can find itself over-extended, doing too many things. Most
organizations’ strategic focus is on the stakeholder groups such as
customers, shareholders, and employees. Most public limited companies,
for example will have “shareholder value” as a major strategic area. The
strategic areas should be linked to the strategic goals defined in step
1. For example the strategic goal of having the most innovative ‘minor’s
savings account’ at a commercial bank by the year 2012, means that the
strategic area for the bank is to focus on ‘product innovation’.
Step 3: A strategic grid is built for each major strategic area of
the business. Having devised the strategy in step 1 and identified the
strategic areas in step 2, these are now translated into a set of grids.
As described earlier, Balanced Scorecards are structured over four
perspectives: Financial, Customer, Internal Processes, and Learning and
Growth. Strategic grids include these four layers. Within each layer,
the strategic objectives are placed, making sure everything links back.
Trying to develop strategic objectives and placing them into the correct
layers for all strategic grids is probably the most difficult step in
building the Balanced Scorecard (Kaplan and Norton, 1996).
Phase 2: Three critical components
Step 4: Measurements are established for each strategic objective in
the areas identified (Hubbard, 2007). The measurement criteria provide
the targets which can then be used to measure the level of success in
achieving them. For each strategic objective on the strategic grid, at
least one measurement is required. If there are several measurements for
a strategic objective, then chances are that there is more than one
strategic objective. Is it possible to have an objective without a
measurement? Yes, it is possible, but not having a measurement makes it
difficult to manage the objective.
It’s best to revisit this objective and ask the question: Why is this
objective without a measurement? Measurement makes it easy to quantify
the strategic objectives, asking the question: How well are we doing? (Niven,
2006).
Step 5: Targets are set for each measurement. Measurement alone is
not good enough. We must drive behavioural changes within the
organization if we expect to execute strategy. This requires
establishing a target for each measurement within the Balanced
Scorecard.
Targets are designed to stretch and push the organization in meeting
its strategic objectives. For example, suppose the strategic objective
is to improve customer satisfaction and the measurement is based on the
number of customer complaints.
If the average number of monthly complaints is 50 for the last 12
months, then a target of no more than 35 complaints could be
established.
Targets need to be realistic so that people feel comfortable about
trying to execute on the target. Therefore, targets should be mutually
agreed upon between management and the person held responsible for
hitting the target. One good place to start in setting a target is to
look at past performance. Past trends can be extended for modest
improvement.
Step 6: At this step, formal programs, activities, initiatives or
projects are designed and launched to achieve the targets set for each
area.
This is perhaps the trickiest part in the entire process. Some
typical examples of programs include quality improvement programs,
marketing initiatives, enterprise resource planning, customer relations
management and supply chain management. These programs usually have
certain characteristics such as: * Support by top level management. *
Utilization of designated leaders and cross-functional teams. * Presence
of deliverables, milestones and a timeline. * Requiring resources
(people, facilities, allocated budget, etc.)
Phase 3: Development
Step 7: The entire process of building a Balanced Scorecard is
repeated in other parts of the organization to construct a single
coherent management system. This integrates all parts of the
organization and allows successful execution of the strategy.
Budgeting and Balance Scorecard
BSC should work in conjunction with budgetary system for performance
measurement.
The budget which represents a set of financial targets is constantly
monitored through monthly performance reviews and remedial steps are
taken in order to rectify any significant variance.
BSC could be linked with the corporate plan of the company. Corporate
plan is a long-term plan that maps out the long-term goals of an
organization in line with its vision, mission and objectives. In this
case of measuring, it is easier to measure quantitative rather than
qualitative measures.
Balance scorecard can be used to look at a financial organization in
broader prospects under four main categories of financial, customer,
learning and growth and internal process to set organizational strategic
directions, evaluation and monitor actual performance.
No manager can ignore the bottom-line. What has happened is the key
indicator, but you need a ‘Balance Scorecard’ to measure, not just how
you’ve been doing, but also how well you can expect to do in the future.
Then the company will have a clear picture of reality, and can proceed
with confidence and success.
|