Redesigning university education: A necessity
Lionel Wijesiri
Higher education is widely accepted as a major instrument for
promoting socio-economic, political and cultural development in any
country. Universities educate future leaders and develop the high-level
technical capacities that underpin economic growth and development.
Besides, the main purpose and relevance of university education is the
provision of suitable manpower to accelerate the socio-economic
development of a nation. In such perspective, higher education is
regarded as an instrument of social change and economic development.
For a long period of time, the universities in Sri Lanka have been
central to the success of the national higher education enterprise,
pursuing distinctive missions while responding to changing societal
expectations to expand and diversify their functions.
In recent years, however, a number of decision-makers and
opinion-shapers have begun to question about many aspects of our
universities and demanding greater attention to undergraduate education,
and wider scrutiny of faculty productivity. Within this political and
economic climate, it is essential to consider how the challenges facing
our universities today may fundamentally affect the lives of faculty
within them including both students and academic staff.
I am not a specialist in higher education. My little speciality lies
elsewhere ? in Human Resources. I share my concerns as a senior citizen
who is interested in the welfare of the country and the future
generation and accordingly use this article as an opportunity to reflect
on possible futures. These few reflections are offered as my personal
opinion how our universities may be sustained as economically,
organizationally, and intellectually viable and attractive places for
academic work.
Crisis
The story of the present university education in Sri Lanka can be
viewed as a story of mixed fortune. Today, there are doubts whether our
universities under the current conditions will be able to continue to
lay claims on being central to national capacity to connect with the new
international knowledge system and develop technologies needed in the
wider society.
Most educationalists believe that university governance in Sri Lanka
today is nothing but crises management.
I believe there are 5 reasons for the crisis.
1. Funding Shortage: It is not a secret that there is growing
shortage of funds and learning resources in our university system. It is
true that there is a substantial increase in the proportion of total
expenditure devoted to overall education, but allocation made to
university sector has been considered to be inadequate considering the
increase in under-graduate enrolment and ever increasing cost.
2. Deteriorated infrastructure: It is worrisome to note that our
universities are fast decaying. All the resources required for education
production process are in short supply. Lecture halls, laboratories,
student’s hostels, library space, books and journals and office spaces
are all inadequate. This condition of resource inadequacy is an offshoot
of the endemic financial crises in the sector.
3. Brain-drain syndrome: University brain-drain refers to widespread
migration of academic staff from the universities in the country to
overseas universities or equivalent institutions here their services are
better rewarded. According to information available, institutional
deterioration has prompted substantial ‘brain-drain’ of academic staff
and impeded new staff recruitment. It must be emphasized that while the
best brains are leaving the university system, the broad aim of
producing high level manpower from the system for national development
cannot be achieved.
4. Graduate unemployment: The problem of graduate unemployment is a
reality in Sri Lanka where some graduates had to wait for years to get a
job in the public service. It is even common in recent times for
university graduates to be subjected to series of competitive
examination for appointments.
5. Volatile and militant student unionism: One of the banes of
effective university management in Sri Lanka in recent times is the
unbridled student violent reaction to political issues and internal
problems.
The result of student militancy and violent unionism has been the
constant closure of universities. It has been observed that universities
these days are not totally free from the hand of politics outside the
university system.
Fortunately, the Government has understood the prevailing ills and
are determined to put the House in order. At the highest level,
President Mahinda Rajapaksa recently promised to talk with student
population and the academic staff of the universities to identify the
problems encountered by them. These are good signs.
To be continued |