Cinema is an art beyond theatre - Inoka Sathyanganee
Aravinda HETTIARACHCHI
Inoka Sathyanganee fits the description of a
classical artist who has found her wings in the field of film direction
in Sri Lanka; a female in a significant male role. She has taken to the
medium in her tender age. When children her age played with dolls she
found herself lost in pictures. Later her attraction to pictures pushed
her soul towards cinema
|
Inoka
Sathyanganee |
She was crazy over films and consequently insisted her parents to
take her for films. Her desire and talent to write made her the script
writer in all the dramas held in her school. She was not keen on formal
education. She joined Telecine as a trainee director of TV commercials.
Unsatisfied with the commercial aspects of it all, she moved to
Teleview while studying cinema as a subject in OCIC (Office Catholique
Internationale du Cinema).
She made her debut one-episode tele-drama (‘Nidi Nathi Rayaka
Sihinayak’) for Teleview. Thereafter she created a series of episodes
‘Urumayak Nathi Uruma Laddo’. Then Rupavahini has categorized this as an
adults only tele-drama and rejected it. Later, she had a chance of
showing it through ITN and there she got the Best Young Tele Drama
Director of the year award. Consequently, the National Film Development
Board sponsored her to do a film. This is how her first film ‘Sulan
Kirillee’ took flight. We had a chance of sharing some of her ideas with
us.
Q: How do you define cinema as an art form?
A: I think cinema has its own capability and to attract human
minds as a magnetic field among all other medias in art. The artistic
value of a cinematic work totally depend on the audience. And cinema has
a vast capacity to travel through various dimensions in human mind. It
is a media even beyond the theatre or any other aesthetic art form.
Cinema and its own parameters make us travel beyond the variety of our
perceptions. It placed ourselves in an ‘other’ dwelling place of human
thought. That is the truth even after 100 years of its history.
Therefore still cinema could not be replaced by any other visual media.
Cinema is the most powerful media that can deal differently with various
ways common and uncommon to the world.
Q: Is feminism a dominant ideology in your cinema?
A: No. I can prove it by my next movie. I believe this is a
world of male and female species. You cannot avoid both these species in
any case. One of my documentaries (Thuttiri Mal) on Free Trade Zones
life in Lanaka has screened on Rupavahini. The process of doing this
documentry inspired my soul on the critical issues of women. And I had
an opportunity to study strange issues of women.
A girl in Katunayake Amandoluva village who was hiding her pregnancy
and delivered the child in a toilet. She got caught to her boarding
owner (a retired principle) while she was throttling her child to death.
This retired principle and his wife saved the child’s life by taking her
to the hospital. And they are the people today who look after this
child. This story shocked my soul and help me a lot to look through the
depths of women.
Woman is still a secondary citizen in this society. I myself a woman
as well. I was aware that a woman have less privileges comparing to the
males in society. Consequently my films in future will carryout womens
issues. Yet I don’t like that you call me a feminist. Because then it
becomes a project of an feminist activist. It will suppress the cinema
artist in me. Consequently the feminist activist or that dry ideologist
will over-determine in myself. I don’t like to be just an ideologist. I
am an artist who interests in women’s human issues, and that is it all
about.
Q: Do you think our cinema reached international standards?
A: Lankan cinema is a minute dot in the world map of cinema.
It is a truth we had some International awards. Yet as an industry we
are unable to reach international standards.
Lester James Peiris has unclosed this island’s cinema into the world.
He was rewarded international awards after 1965. Thereafter our cinema
artists moved slowly. Yet the third generation after Prasanna Withanage
has again accelerated this move. Young cinema artists such as me, Ashoka
Handagama, Vimukthi Jayasundare, Sathyajith Maitipe and etc came with
international awards.
We showed the international world a classical cinema of this island.
Yet this is not enough. We still have no opportunity to release a film
in a foreign cinema hall. There may be rare cases. As an industry we are
lagging behind. Our films are still unable to establish in the foreign
market. We still in a process of achieving this target. This might be
successful or not.
The world cinema is a massive canvas and We are just a dot on it. The
State government should take the responsibility to produce and sell our
films to the foreign market. My first filmƒ??Sulan Kirilleeƒ?? was
sponsored by the government film co-operation and took the highest
international awards (11 awards) in that year. Our generation have
gained international awards in 12 A grade film festivals around the
world. Among us, the highest credit should go to Vimukthi Jayasundare.
Yet still cricket gets the highest credits than the cinema.
Our cinema has been already brought up by our seniors such as Lester
James Peiris, Darmasena Pathiraja, Dharmasiri Bandaranayake and etc.
First the State must identify all these cinema artiste as dignified
citizens in this country. And it should protect cinema as ancient
Sigiriya or Mahamevnava.
The Euro-US countries and India have a massive cinema culture and an
Industry than us. And cinema is academically accepted in countries such
as Bangladesh and Maldives even they don’t have a macro-culture for
cinema. This isle hasn’t enough institutions to educate its cinema
artists. Sripali is not enough to do that. It’s students even comes to
learn from us. This proves that they are lack of enough guidance.
The State should be responsible until we achieved good standards as
an industry. In India, the lower cultured people who taste popular
cinema. Yet there are a lot of educated groups of perception who taste
classical cinema. We don’t have such a culture. We have no fans’ groups
of such a refine discourse.
Yet I believe that popular cinema should also take place as classical
cinema. We should give the people of simple taste what they want.
Basically there are levels such as popular, middle path, artistic and
more classical or experimental in cinema. Yet our country today produced
only 10 films per year.
Q: What is your opinion on the film critics in this isle
nation?
A: Critics are very much important for the development of
films. Critic is the bridge between the the film and its spectator.
Unfortunately real critics in this country are being extinct like
dinosaurs. We have sort of critics who watch films and just write
‘something to gain a mere name out of it. Most of them ask for bribes to
write in direct and indirect ways. They do ‘criticisms’ of favoritism.
Only a handful of well reputed critics such as Gamini Weragama, Gunasiri
de Silva, Saman Wickramaarachchi and etc are away from this malpractice.
Most of others are writing for money or privileges. If they get
satisfied by the client, then they just write a synopsis of a critic
about the film by only admiring it. And we all put the blame on the
critics. Yet, in this country, critics are not been sufficiently paid.
They therefore don’t have a dignity in this society. There should a
better paying scheme for the critics. For instance, Indian critics are
much more reputed comparing to our critics.
‘Sulang
Kirilli’ (The Wind Bird)
International Film Awards
* Best Film Award,
International Critics Award, Best Actress Award, Dhaka
International Film Festival in Bangladesh - 2004 - January.
* Best Film given by the
jury of O.C.I.C. at The 21st Cinematica Del Uruguaya in
Latin America - 2003.
* The Major Opera Prima
Award for Best New Director 21st Cinematica Del Uruguaya in
Latin America - 2003.
* Silver Dhow award for the
Best Feature Film at Zanzibar International Film Festival in
Tanzania - 2003.
* Cetificato Di Merito
Silver of the 12th Prix Leonardo International Film
Festival.
* Best Director Award, Best
Actress Award of Tamil Nadu International Film Festival -
2004.
* Best Cinematography
(Feature) Award of New York International Independent Film &
Video Festival 2005 - “Kala Suri National Award given given
by the President.
* Vishwa Keerthi Golden Lion
Presidential Award for Sri Lankan film makers 2005.
* Best Director Award
Sarasaviya Film Festival in Sri Lanka - 2004. |
Zhao: The Wushu wizard in Sri Lanka
Ishara JAYAWARDANE
The world is a small world indeed. Nations are being united by so
many forces. Wushu an ancient Chinese sport dating back to 2,500 years,
is also set to become a Sri Lankan way of life.
Zhao Qianqian is from the Chinese province of Shandong. At first
glance she seems mild mannered and affable - which she is. But there is
another side to Zhao, she is also an expert at Wushu. A teacher and a
competitor.
|
|
zhao in
various battle stances |
“Wushu teaches us not to fight but to defend and protect. Wushu
teaches you not to hate someone. It is very good for health. It is not
only a sport for boys. Even girls can do Wushu.
In Sri Lanka the girls are good at Wushu. Many girls can play, they
have good bodies, the girls should learn more,” said Zhao.
At the age of 10 Zhao took up Wushu, in fact she took to it quite
late. At China children take up Wushu at the age of three to six years.
Zhao was very lucky, she had a really good coach and he taught her many
lessons concerning Wushu.
“My coach motivated me. He came to my school and selected me. At
first I simply studied. After 10 years I went to Sports School and took
up Wushu,” said Zhao. Zhao started doing Wushu from 1997. Her first year
coach was Xie Pei Qing. After 2000 he told Zhao’s mother that he could
not teach her more as her knowledge was excellent and it was time for
her to go to a higher level.
“My second coach was a lady Lin Shu Ping. She was a fine coach. She
was like a mother to me. Her knowledge of Wushu was very deep. She
looked after all her students. We loved her so much,” added Zhao. In
2001 she joined the Shandong Wushu team.
“I was selected to the Beijing Sports university. And I started
teaching from my university. I helped my teacher to teach students.
This was the first time I started teaching students. I coached the
Shandong province in the 2002 competition,” stated Zhao.
There are many Wushu schools in Shandong. The best in those schools
are selected to the Shandong province team.
In those Wushu schools the goals are single minded- complete training
in Wushu.
“I want to develop Chinese Wushu in Sri Lanka because I am Chinese. I
am starting some classes for school students. I was here in 2008. I came
here and taught Sri Lankan coaches. Her Beijing University teacher was
Ma Lao Shi/Ma Xue Zhi. Zhao has taken part in almost eight tournaments.
The school Wushu Federation in Sri Lanka needed someone to come to
Sri Lanka and train the coaches and Ma lao Shi proposed her name.
“Kung Fu and Wushu are the same thing. In China we called it Wushu.
Kung Fu was popularized by Jackie Chan and Jet Li. Those movies don’t
call it Wushu but Chinese Kung fu. In China we have competitive Wushu
and Traditional Wushu” said Zhao.
Wushu was popularized as Kung Fu due to the films such as that of
David Carradine. Certain things were added to Wushu over the years.
Other countries do not know much about Wushu but they know about Kung
Fu.
In the 1920’s Chinese Wushu Association was formed composed of
teachers from various schools. This was probably when the Kung Fu
terminology began. This was first demonstrated in the 1936 Olympic
games.
In 1950’s Chinese Wushu Federation was formed and in 1989 World Wushu
Federation was formed.
“Wushu has taught me to be a good person. I teach all my students to
be good people. Your heart has to be good,” concluded Zhao.
Celebrity faces before their fame
Charmaine Fernando
|
|
|
|
Beyonce |
Eminem |
Halle
Berry |
Cristina A |
|
|
|
|
Brittney |
Angelina
Jollie |
Janet J |
JayLo |
|
|
|
|
Julia
Roberts |
Keanu
Reeves |
Lianardo
Di Capri |
Madonna |
They were all pretty faces born to be famous someday. But the fact is
they didn’t know it then.
When we stare at their sweet innocent faces we cannot help but sigh
with remorse at what fame and riches have done to them. Today despite
their highly made up facade they hide agony, some trying to get off
their wrong tracks that had driven them off road to despair.
They do drugs possibly fame came too early before they developed
enough guts to prepare for it.
The shock of it all had driven them in to what they should not. Some
are in rehab, some with broken homes. But they all smile for the
paparazzi through a mask of makeover. If only they knew better.
Nevertheless we cannot help but envy their luck and riches not
forgetting their enormous talent and beauty which had made them the
celebrities the common people simply drool over. |