Catholic Church in Sri Lanka:
Contribution to education
In the past the Western powers ruled
countries in Asia, Africa and Latin America by the power of the gun.
Today they adopt various devices like globalisation, IMF, NGOs,
multi-national companies consumerism and cultural invasion to keep the
third world countries under their subjugation. The whole process
interned as ‘Re-colonisation’ and they use Christianity too for their
imperial designs. First part of this article was published yesterday
W T A Leslie Fernando
That is not all. The Catholic Church today is opening branches of
such schools all over the country for the benefit of bourgeoisie
classes. In 1997, the delegates of the then Patriotic Catholic Front
giving evidence before the Sinhala Commission condemned opening up these
elite schools. The Catholic Church too was involved in opening up
international schools.
One of the first to object against the international schools was the
educationist Fr W L A Don Peter despite the fact that the Catholic
Church too opened up one of the earliest international schools. Today
the Catholic Church opens up international schools all over in
competition with others to cater to the rich.
It is unbecoming of the representatives of God to charge illegal sums
in the name of donations on admissions for students and set up
international schools under the cover of Business Registration Act to
cater to the rich. Fr Joseph E Fernando identifies that the Catholic
education is bourgeoisie orientated where the children of fishermen,
farmers and plantation workers are neglected.
In the late 1980’s when terrorist activities were rampant in the
country, there were attempts by the Catholic priests in the NGO sector
to infiltrate to the JVP. In some songs of Nanda Malinee’s Pavana
program sung at JVP rallies the influence of ‘Liberation Theology’ is
seen.
Controversial priest
There was a controversial priest who vehemently advocated that
Buddhism and Christianity were parallel religions and lived in a house
away from the Church in lay cloths surrounded by some nuns wearing lungi.
He had some dealings with the JVP and Police were on his trail.
He was suddenly assassinated while performing Mass one evening in
sarong while nuns were by his side. There is a controversy about his
death. The priests in the NGO sector try to make him a Saint and martyr
who laid down his life for the cause of suffering. The other view is
that the terrorists themselves have killed him to prevent the Police
extracting information about them. The manner in which he was
assassinated by sudden firing and the killers vanishing indicate it was
a terrorist killing.
There is a false belief that the Catholic community in Sri Lanka
blindly obeys the hierarchy. The 2005 Presidential Election proved this
to the country. Just before that election there was an advertisement in
both Catholic and national journals with the photographs of the then
Archbishop Oswald Gomis and Lalith Kothelawala under the title
‘Christians Awake’ with insinuations not to vote for President Mahinda
Rajapaksa.
Electoral lists
Although a few Catholic priests tactfully supported President Mahinda
Rajapaksa, the majority of Catholic priests and Catholic organizations
worked against him. There were announcements from pulpits, pamphlets and
news items in Catholic journals so as to create a fear psychosis among
the Catholics that if Mahinda Rajapaksa from the UPFA would win, the
Catholics would be harassed and victimised.
However, the majority of Catholics defied the Church and voted for
President Mahinda Rajapaksa. He got a majority of votes in all the
predominant Catholic electorates except Negombo and Wattala.
In Negombo 12 percent of voters are Muslims and in Wattala there are
nine percent Tamils. It is doubtful whether the majority of Catholics in
these two electorates too voted against President Rajapaksa. After
President Rajapaksa’s victory there were complaints in Catholic journals
that the names of some Catholic clergy were deleted from electoral
lists.
After Rt Rev Dr Malcolm Ranjith became Colombo Archbishop he made a
statement although he earlier stood for a negotiated settlement that the
LTTE was not keen for peace and appreciated President Rajapaksa bringing
peace to the country by defeating the LTTE. During the 2010 Presidential
Election, the Catholic Bishops’ Conference made a pronouncement allowing
Catholics to vote according to their conscience. This was a better
position than the stand of the Church at the 2005 Presidential Election.
Whether the Catholic Church would shed its reactionary bourgeoisie
outlook is yet to be seen.
Concluded
|