Raavan
Tribal demon can be godly in reality :
Film review
Aravinda Hettiarachchi
Indian Filmmaker Mani Rathnam’s Hindi and Tamil films Raavan (Hindi)
and Ravana (Tamil) were released in Sri Lanka recently. Most of the
Indian film lovers in our country anticipated that this film would have
a similar story line as that of the epic Ramayanaya. Yet Raavan has
features of modernity rather than a mere story blended with legend and
mythology.
Aishwarya as Ragini |
I see it as a tragic-fictional work of art focusing on two warriors
belonging to different social classes, both fall in love with the same
woman.
The film tries to prove to the heroine (as well as the audience) that
a tribal demon can be godly in reality. At the same time an apparently
civilized man (Dev) of godly attributes could be a demon in reality.
It is evident that the so-called civilized world dominates the scene
until the truth is revealed. At the end of the film the tribal man who
is governed by the rules of the nature seems to be good. The fall (or
death) of Beera in reality is one extraordinary reason for his godly
love. Yet, in another point of view, love has no reasons.
Although both Raavan and Avatar have different story lines, they
carry out the same philosophical content. Thus, it is clear that the
Indian popular cinema is directly or indirectly influenced by the
Hollywood films.
Beera (Abhishek Bachchan) whom most of our film fans assumed is
Ravana is the demon. However Mani Rathnam had not created this character
totally within the environment of the forest. Earlier, Beera lived in
one of the open rural villages of India. Yet an unfortunate incident is
that his beautiful sister was molested (in her wedding day) by the
police and committed suicide. This made him a half tribal leader with an
erotic personality.
The story openss as Beera and his semi-tribal clan hide in the forest
of north India due to their criminal activities against the police.
Beera’s hunting skills and knowledge of the jungle won’t allow the
Indian police to trace them easily.
The police are even scared of this dangerous outlaw. In the beginning
of the film, Beera and his clan ruthlessly kill the policemen and loot
their weaponry. Here the film director allows the spectator to believe
that Beera is an arrogant killer.
Dev (Vikram), the legal husband of Ragini (Aishwarya Rai Bachchan),
denotes a controversial meaning through his name. The heroine and the
audience glimpse the ruthless side of Dev’s personality from episodes
which take place within the storyline. This encourages the fans and the
heroine to be more realistic about the story and search for the good
side of Beera.
Aishwarya and Abhishek in a scene from the movie |
Dev tracks down Beera. The comic forest guard (Govinda) whom our fans
interpreted as Huannuman, the monkey, helps Dev and his fellow policemen
to capture Beera. The war between Beera and Dev ends with Ragini’s
tears. Ragini cries for the reason that Beera is fallen shot dead down
to the steep of the mountain with the unethical bullets of her husband
Dev and his men. The scenes full of climbing rocky mountains or jumping
off cliffs with wonderful stunt acts enthralls the fans. Yet these
actions of cinematic technicalities go beyond the necessity of
reproducing the particular film’s story. It reveals Rathnam’s desire to
make a celebrating film with Euro-Us components of Hollywood.
On the other hand, this intention had also blurred the essence of the
story to a certain extent. Yet his amazing talent in cinematography
still reproduces emotions heartily and aesthetically on the screen. This
holds the storyline unbroken until the last scene.
A film story, in most instances, loses its integrity due to the
mistakes and over interpretations of the film script.
I suppose that Rathnam’s film script, to a certain extent, dragging
its basic content into unnecessary fascinations. Compared with his
masterpiece Nayagan, the film loses lot of nuances. Yet he has very
keenly surfaced the basic contradictions in Ramayanaya through this
saga. Also, Rathnam metaphorically lays a complicated sociological
meaning underneath this storyline.
There we metaphorically find the Euro-centric post colonial
civilization and its problem with the public in India through Dev’s
character and the police. Controversially, within the same society, we
see the Asian tribal residues in humanism through Beera’s character
while the universal human love of a woman beyond ethnical faithfulness
softly touches us through Ragini’s character.
Rathnam, with this massive production, is still maintaining his
reputation as the founder of the middle path in Indian cinema between
the serious and popular. Yet his contribution to a classical production
is still lagging behind after Nayagan. |