UN can’t force us
President Mahinda Rajapaksa spoke of
several key issues of national and international importance in an
interview with indian journalist K Venkataramanan, at Temple Trees.
Excerpts of the interview
Q: Your popularity in the country is
at its height. But aren’t you worried about the international image of
the country and your own personal image abroad?
A: Why should I worry
about others? If India and neighbours are good with me, that is enough
for me.
Determined to handle international pressure. File photo |
Q: The UN has made adverse remarks
about the Human Rights situation and many have called for an
international investigation into war crimes in the last phase of the
war.
A: They should understand
the country’s situation. Earlier, they said Prabhakaran was the world’s
most ruthless terrorist. But now, suddenly, when I defeated him, they
are talking differently. I wonder if they would say the same if Bin
Laden were to be defeated. They can advise us, but they can’t force us.
No one can force us to do this or that.
Q: The international community,
including EU, even India, frequently asks you to speed up the process of
finding a political solution. Where do you stand on that?
A: We will take our own
time and the solution, you can’t ask for an instant solution like
instant noodles. Constitutions are not for one or two days. It is not a
magazine which is published weekly or monthly.
We can’t change the Constitution frequently.
We will have to take our own time. We will certainly change all this.
My commitment remains.
Q: The European Union has threatened
to suspend GSP Plus tariff concessions for Sri Lanka.
A: I am not bothered.
These concessions were offered soon after the tsunami. Now the tsunami
(rehabilitation) is over, it helped us at that time. Now we must find
new markets. Our people must know this: when I called the elections,
they (EU) immediately called for suspension of tariff concessions. It
was a politically motivated decision. If the EU doesn’t want to give it
(concessions), let them keep it. I don’t want it. We have gone and
explained what we have done. Now we have appointed it (an inquiry
commission), not because someone wanted me to, but because I am
committed to that.
Q: The commission is about the
lessons learnt and what should be done for national reconciliation. You
must have your own view on this. Are the lessons learnt from this
conflict and what are your suggestions for national reconciliation?
A: The people must trust
each other. We have to build that trust. In Colombo, about 30 years ago,
Sinhalese were the majority. Today, they are a minority, about 27
percent. There are more Tamils and Muslims now. But I don’t see this as
a problem. I believe in mixed population. Earlier, there was and they
had no problem like this. Only politicians make these issues for their
own ends.
Q: There are fears of complete
Sinhalization of the North and East. Will the Sinhala people be settled
in those areas in large numbers?
A: They were there, you
know. They were chased by Prabhakaran, so, if anybody wants to go there,
yes, they can. What if somebody were to say that in Colombo, the Tamils
have come in large number?
Q: How do you see your relations with
China?
A: We are a non-aligned
country. Our neighbours are Indians. I always say, Indians are our
relations. From the time of Emperor Asoka, we have had that culture. The
whole culture, irrigation, architecture has been built up over the last
2,500 years. You can’t break that. But that doesn’t mean we won’t get
commercial benefits from others. From China, or Japan, or whoever. They
will come here, they will build, they will go back. In simple terms,
whenever our relationship is stronger and we get close to India, this
campaign begins. They start to say India has started to rule, and they
know India is very sensitive about Pakistan or China. So they will use
these factors to upset the Indian public. Well, I think even the LTTE
used this point.
Q: How do you see your recent visit
to India and the joint statement that spoke of cooperation in various
fields?
A: I think it was a very
successful visit. The agreements that we signed, in fact most of them,
are concerned with development work, especially in the North,
infrastructure development, railways, housing projects (50,000 houses in
the North and East), power plant project in Sampur. All those things are
necessary for the country’s development.
Q: Some of these ideas have been
around for two to three years. However, not much progress has been made.
Do you think work will speed up now?
A: I very much hope so. We
need to have targets. Earlier, we could say the delay was due to the
terrorist problem or something. Now we cannot say all those things. We
agreed that all projects will be started by 2010.
Q: How do you foresee Indo-Sri Lankan
relations over the next five years?
A: It will be very strong.
We had certain issues in the past, but now it is very good, we
understand them, they understand us. This is the best time we have had
at all levels. Even the people-to-people contacts, business,
politicians.
Times of India |