Korean War: Is a second edition imminent?
Jayatilleke de Silva
Tensions sparked between North and South Korea
following the incident of South Korean ship being sunk. Will this
reignite the Korean war?
[Korean War ]
* Fought duing : 1950-19553
* Main parties: The Republic of Korea, supported by the United
Nations, and the Democratic People's Republic of Korea and People's
Republic of China (PRC), air support from the Soviet Union.
* Reason: A result of the political division of Korea by agreement
of the victorious Allies at the conclusion of the Pacific War. It was
the first significant armed conflict of the Cold War.
Courtesy: Wikipedia
The international wire services were full of news from the Korean
peninsula for the last couple of weeks. South Korea officially claimed
that North Korea had sunk one of its naval ships, the Cheonan on March
26, killing 46 of its navy personnel. A statement issued by Republic of
Korea National Defence Ministry on May 20 that a Joint Civilian-Military
Investigation Group (JIG) has confirmed the complicity of North Korea in
the sinking of Cheonan.
Kim Jong-Il |
South Korean President Lee Myung-bak |
Chinese Prime Minister Wen Jiabao |
The map of South Korea |
The group comprised 25 experts from 10 top Korean expert agencies, 22
military experts, three experts recommended by the National Assembly,
and 24 foreign experts constituting four support teams from the United
States, Australia, the United Kingdom and the Kingdom of Sweden.
However, North Korea rejected the allegations and declared its
innocence. On May 24 South Korea cut off trade relations with North
Korea, denied North Korean merchant ships use of its sea lanes and
called on the United Nations to censure the North for the sinking of
Cheonan.
It also declared its intention to resume propaganda broadcasts aimed
at the North that were carried out with the use of loudspeakers on the
South Korean side of the demilitarized zone dividing the two Koreas.
The North retaliated with a threat to cut off all relations with the
South, banned its air space and sea lanes for South Korean airplanes and
ships and expelled South Korean Government officials in the Kaesong Free
Trade Zone and prohibited the removal of any material from that zone
without its prior approval. Sanctions would be met with an all out war,
the North threatened. Meanwhile, joint military exercises by the United
States and South Korea were also announced.
A calm Seoul
The scenario pictured by the wire services and pronouncements of
politicians on both sides of the divide was one of imminent wars. It is
at this juncture that the writer had an opportunity be in Seoul and
assess the ground situation.
Surprisingly the atmosphere in Seoul was calm. People were going
about in their usual routine of work. There was no anxiety written on
their faces. Nor did they give out any behavioural pattern that betrayed
a fear of an imminent catastrophe. War would be another catastrophe, for
sure.
An Editor of a responsible newspaper when queried said that the
people have experienced such scenes many a time before and are not
apprehensive. Whether the North Koreans have sunk the Cheonan or not
such tirades of accusations and counter-accusations were not rare before
elections, he explained. The Municipal elections in South Korea were
scheduled for June 3. (Incidentally the Opposition won the majority of
seats)
Of course, the Editor was expressing a current of thoughts prevalent
at the grass roots level. Subsequent developments, however, confirmed
somewhat the viewpoint of the Editor. Both sides withdrew to some extent
from the positions officially declared.
The propaganda blast hasn’t yet begun. Nor has the North closed all
channels of communication with the South. It, in fact, announced that
the work at the Kaesong Free Trade Zone would go on as usual. Even goods
produced there were sent to the South without a hassle.
Korea University North Korean Studies, Professor Ho-Yeol Yoo
dismissed fears of a new Cold War as unfounded. Both sides are treading
cautiously, he explained. For example, he said that the South Korean
Defence Ministry statement did not refer to Kim Il Jong by name so as to
leave him with an honourable exit path get out of the situation.
It is necessary to understand the present day geo-political
realities, if one were to draw rational conclusions from the
developments in the Korean peninsula. Though North Korea may be no match
for the South Korean-US combined military strength, force does not solve
all issues. Besides, the North has enough lethal power within its range
to inflict heavy damage to the South though it may not win a protracted
war.
The Chinese factor
Economics would have precedence over politics. China is a strong
trade partner of South Korea. In fact, South Korean trade with China is
expected to top US $ 200 billion this year. The two countries have also
started preliminary negotiations for a Free Trade Agreement.
A recent Summit meeting of South Korea, China and Japan decided to
conduct a joint feasibility study to set up a Free Trade Area comprising
the three countries by 2012. China being a strong ally of North Korea,
and a key trade partner of South Korea, much will depend on the position
taken by China. It is unthinkable that either the North or the South
would be rash enough to displease China, the emerging global power.
On the other hand, the United States’ capabilities are also limited.
Since the United States needs China more than China needs the United
States economically and the US is heavily indebted to China.
A US - China conflagration in the Korean peninsula is highly unlikely
today or even in the near future. Cheonan issue, China stood firm. While
saying that China would “determine its position based on an objective
and impartial judgment”. Wen did not forget to add that China “denounces
and opposes any attempt to destroy the peace and security in the Korean
peninsula”.
Apparently South Korean people too seem to have similar thoughts. In
a rebuff to the Government’s handling of the Cheonan issue they have
voted the Opposition into power in the majority of municipal areas.
While it may not mean solidarity with the North one thing is clear. That
is the Koreans prefer peace to war. The Lee administration’s handling of
the Cheonan issue has boomeranged on it. |