AG responds to Pillay
Attorney General Mohan Peiris responding to the statement made by
High Commissioner of Human Rights Navanetham Pillay at the 14th session
of the UN Human Rights Council in Geneva on May 31 said that Sri Lankan
Government was of the view that the High Commissioner regretfully seeks
to prejudge the outcome of the Lessons Learnt and Reconciliation
Commission even before the mechanism has begun its work.
He said Sovereign States having emerged from protracted armed
conflicts resort to domestic mechanisms, as encouraged by the UN
Secretary General himself, due to the complexed nature of the issues at
hand and their domestic relevance and better understanding.
It is in this context that the Government has consistently upheld and
established a domestic mechanism for transitional justice, rather than
one with an international complexion, which would impinge on the very
sovereignty that was under threat for nearly three decades.
Further, it is inappropriate to be wholly guided by precedent, that
too not having paid heed to connected issues to keep advocating for a so
called “independent international accountability mechanism.”
“The Government has delivered on related undertakings in the past.
In this instance too we will deliver on our commitment as the
domestic mechanism’s Warrant clearly provides for the identification of
direct or indirect responsibility, which would hold perpetrators, if
any, accountable for past violations, and will not be deterred by any
pressure or force in achieving a lasting peace for our people.”
We say to those who are our protagonists let this process commence as
envisaged, observe its progress constructively and provide the necessary
space without unwarranted and misplaced rhetoric.
The AG noted that it was disconcerting for the Government to be
needlessly confronted, at this time of a paradigm shift in the hearts
and minds of our people, by the observations in the High Commissioner’s
statement, after having taken concrete steps in keeping with domestic
compulsions, to address post conflict reconciliation issues.
|