Good news on MDG target on water, bad news on sanitation
Riaz K Tayob
A WHO/UNICEF report on sanitation and drinking
water has found that the progress made towards meeting the Millennium
Development Goal (MDG) on drinking water is encouraging. However, the
same cannot be said of the sanitation target.
Geneva: While there is good news on progress towards meeting
the Millennium Development Goal (MDG) No. 7 on water, much more needs to
be done to come close to the sanitation target, a WHO/UNICEF progress
report on sanitation and drinking water has found.
(MDG No. 7 comprises four targets. The first is to integrate the
principles of sustainable development into country policies and programs
and reverse the loss of environmental resources. The second is to reduce
biodiversity loss, achieving by 2010, a significant reduction in the
rate of loss. The third target is to halve, by 2015, the proportion of
the population without sustainable access to safe drinking water and
basic sanitation. The fourth is to have achieved a significant
improvement in the lives of at least 100 million slum dwellers by 2020.)
The report of the Joint Monitoring Program of WHO/UNICEF on progress
on sanitation and drinking water says that the world is on track to meet
or even exceed the drinking-water target of the Millennium Development
Goals, with 87% of the world’s population, or about 5.9 billion people,
using safe drinking-water sources.
Even so, about 884 million people still do not get their drinking
water from improved sources.
However, for almost 39% of the world population, or over 2.6 billion
people living without improved sanitation facilities, much more needs to
be done to come close to the sanitation target, says the report.
If the current trend continues unchanged, the international community
will miss the 2015 sanitation target by almost 1 billion people.
At the current rate of progress, the world will miss the MDG target
by 13 percentage points, unless huge efforts are made. The target is 23%
of the population without improved sanitation, but it is projected to
reduce to 36% by 2015 from a base level of 46% in 1990.
According to the joint report, even if the target is met, there would
still be 1.7 billion people without access to basic sanitation.
The third target of MDG Goal No. 7 calls on countries to halve, by
2015, the proportion of the population without sustainable access to
safe drinking water and basic sanitation.
According to the joint report, the riskiest sanitation practice of
all, open defecation, is on the decline worldwide, and decreased
globally from 25% in 1990 to 17% in 2008, representing a fall of 168
million people practising open defecation since 1990.
However, this practice is still widespread in Southern Asia
(Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Bhutan, India, Iran, Maldives, Nepal,
Pakistan, and Sri Lanka), where an estimated 44% of the population
defecate in the open. Despite the world’s population being almost
equally divided between urban and rural dwellers, the vast majority
without access to water and sanitation live in rural areas.
Seven out of 10 people without basic sanitation are rural
inhabitants, and more than eight out of 10 people without access to
improved drinking water sources live in rural areas. A similar disparity
is found between the poor and the non-poor.
A comparison between the richest and poorest 20% of the population in
sub-Saharan Africa reveals that the richest are more than twice as
likely to use an improved drinking water source and almost five times
more likely to use improved sanitation facilities. The poorest 20% is
around 16 times more likely to practise open defecation than the richest
quintile.
Although there is insufficient data, country data that is available
confirms similar disparities elsewhere. Unsafe water, sanitation and
hygiene claim the lives of an estimated 1.5 million children under the
age of five each year. Lack of access to water, sanitation and hygiene
affects health and quality of life for children, impacting women and
girls first and foremost, says the report.
For monitoring purposes, the use of improved drinking-water sources
has been equated to access to safe drinking water, but not all improved
sources in actual fact provide drinking water that is safe.
“Water quality remains an elusive indicator in the global monitoring
activities of the JMP (Joint Monitoring Program).”
According to the report, this challenge is being addressed including
through a pilot survey. Results were obtained in the pilot study from
each of eight countries (Bangladesh, China, Ethiopia, India, Jordan,
Nicaragua, Nigeria and Tajikistan) using a randomly selected sample of
1,600 water supplies and 160 households.
The pilot survey found that microbiological compliance with WHO
guidelines varied between countries. On average, compliance was close to
90% for piped water sources, and between 40% and 70% for other improved
sources.
The WHO drinking water quality guidelines provide specific indicators
of microbial contamination and chemical hazards but allow countries to
adapt guideline values to their own socioeconomic contexts.
The report notes that the third edition of the guidelines shifts the
emphasis away from a single point water quality testing to a system of
integrated risk assessment and incremental management.
The pilot survey demonstrated the technical feasibility of such
measurements, notwithstanding the established weaknesses of the use of
the selected indicators (which were tested - like E. Coli) for microbial
safety.
It also showed that such a periodic water quality survey at a global
level was economically not viable. The report states that any new target
set beyond 2015 will have to address water quality, which will have to
be measured or estimated in a meaningful and cost-effective manner.
Third World Network Features
|