Who should be the next President of Sri Lanka?
Shanta Rajapaksha Yapa
Sri Lanka is reaching yet another decisive time as the battle in the
political arena is getting heated up. More importantly the general
public is expected to make a rational decision to select the leader for
the future. Irrespective of the sources, their credibility and agenda
behind the contributors the public is still confused with what appears
in media.
Who really won the war or lead our security forces to eradicate
brutal terrorism from Sri Lanka is important if the public is expected
to select the war hero. Obviously the Presidential Election is not to
select the war hero but to select the leader who can lead our nation to
the future. A leader is expected to possess several traits or attributes
to be successful. Let’s use one of the popular models quite often used
in management to distinguish the two main candidates. This model known
as the Big Five Factor Model is a comprehensive personality theory.
The five factor model covers many elementary personality theories as
well as coincides with integrated research findings in psychology and
human behaviour. Five dimensions or domains of personality as found
through rigorous research are used in this model to define a person and
how he or she interacts within a complex society. The five factors are
Extroversion, Openness, Neuroticism, Agreeableness and
Conscientiousness. This model is also described as CANOE as acronyms in
the reverse order.
Extroversion explains the degree of interaction with people. In this
context, a social worker is more an extrovert. A manager brought up
within an establishment will be more towards an introvert. Extroverts
will have more energy, enthusiasm and activities to be with people.
Introverts may prefer spending time alone and would be disturbed when
social interaction is high. An Extrovert is needed as the next leader
and you may decide who is better.
Openness describes the degree of acceptance of novel things. A
person, who is innovative, looking for challenges and who likes new
experiences is high in openness whereas a person who prefers
conventional or procedural things in an orderly manner is at the other
extreme. Now it is up to you to decide who is more open in terms of
local and international relations, new concepts, changing traditional
things etc.
Neuroticism describes emotional instability. A person with a high
rating in neuroticism would be emotionally reactive. Stress due to
internal and external affairs can make such people highly vulnerable so
as their organizations or communities they lead. They display negative
emotional reactions and this drastically reduces their ability to think
clearly and rationally. They tend to interpret ordinary situations as
threatening with their suspicion in mind and as such they react with
anger. On the contrary, a person who scores a low rating in neuroticism
tends to be calm and less emotional. Despite the internal and external
pressures acting on them or their organizations they tend to handle
situations with a clear mind. With your own experience about the two
candidates you may now judge the person with low neuroticism who is the
ideal leader to drive our nation.
Agreeableness demonstrates a person’s tendency to be benevolent,
empathetic and kind hearted with others. Being suspicious towards others
or hostile will place a person on the other extreme of this dimension of
the big five factor model. Who can tolerate situations, keep unity
within the teams, and manage relations accommodating others yet without
compromising the national objectives? He should be our next President.
Conscientiousness describes determination to achieve the needs with
high degree of self-discipline. A person with a progressive path towards
an achievement will have a higher score in this dimension and a person
who makes instant or spontaneous decisions will be placed on a low
score. The one with a high conscientiousness will be the more suitable
person to be the next president.
The five factor model is the result of rigorous scientific research
studies carried out by eminent scholars. It is empirically tested and is
being used globally by individuals and leading firms in assessing and/or
developing leaders.
All Sri Lankans have the responsibility of selecting the most
appropriate leader who can take the country forward in the post war era,
successfully facing the development challenges and mostly unfavourable
international forces. The model discussed would help you to select
rationally the most suitable candidate without being emotional or misled
by thousands of claims and allegations already published and to be
published in the coming few days.
(The writer is a visiting faculty member teaching business
strategy and technology in graduate and postgraduate programs of 10
leading local and international universities. He does not represent any
political party and the views expressed in the article do not represent
any organizations he is dealing with. His email is [email protected])
|