Presidency and the Green-card
Philip Fernando
Sarath Fonseka is the first United States Green-card holder to seek
the highest elected office in Sri Lanka. That poses a serious conflict
of interest which he has so far failed to put before the people of the
country as part of his election bid. The only honest course of action
open to him is to be transparent in his political discourse with the
electorate and explain his position fully. The duality cannot be hidden
away.
As a US Green-card holder Fonseka's status is that of a permanent US
resident awaiting citizenship in that country. He has not told anyone
whether he has become a US citizen or is still a Green-card holder. He
is required by United States law among other things, to file his income
tax returns every year and not to be away from the USA for more than six
months at a stretch. That rule applies to all Green-card holders.
There are many Green-card holders employed by the Government of Sri
Lanka in various capacities - as ambassadors, officials and even
lawyers. But they can be hired and fired by their employer - the
Government of Sri Lanka. As President, Fonseka entails a duality which
would pose a major conflict of interest to holding the highest office of
Presidency of the Republic of Sri Lanka.
Ability to govern effectively
Above all, Sarath Fonseka has a major conflict of interest in
safeguarding the vital security interests of Sri Lanka as President, if
he remains a Green-card holder or a US citizen.
If there are points of divergence between Sri Lanka and USA on any
matter, Fonseka would be caught between the two conflicting demands that
would be virtually impossible to meet. If he is a Green-card-holder,
Fonseka would be required to make a periodical six-month journey back to
USA every year even for a few weeks to keep his Green-card intact as
required by US law and to file income tax returns every year. It would
detract from his ability to govern effectively. The Green-card would be
annulled if he remains longer than six months (barring exceptional
circumstances like life threatening illness etc).
He would be subject to the strict rules of departure and re-entry
demanded by the US Department of Homeland Security.
Last October-November when Fonseka visited USA he had a narrow shave
as he reportedly dodged the summons of the Homeland Security Department
and Sri Lanka Government reportedly had to send an SOS insisting that
the Fonseka report for duty as a Sri Lankan Armed Forces Chief-he was
still employed by the Government then.
The Homeland Security Department honoured that request of the
Government. Fonseka had used the Diplomatic passport issued by Sri
Lankan Government during that trip to the US.
Sri Lankan ambassador had reportedly brought him to the airport and
saw him through checkpoints.
Candidate Fonseka has to seek legal advice in sorting out what part
of his income is subject to US taxes, if any and what other
ramifications await the duality that he is now trying to create for
himself as a candidate.
Non-Alignment principles
Our relations with countries reportedly adversarial in their dealings
with USA would automatically pose major restrictions on Fonseka's
ability to function as President. Non-aligned principles we so proudly
founded with India, Cuba and others would be jeopardized with a US
Green-card holder or US citizen becoming President of Sri Lanka.
Sarath Fonseka is fully aware what pressures the foreign vested
interests exerted during the last days of the war against the LTTE just
prior to the battle of Nandikadal when Sri Lanka was hit with in
incessant barrage of strictures by those trying to force a ceasefire.
How such an eventuality could be warded off, if the President is a
permanent resident of USA is very much relevant to Sarath Fonseka's
campaign to be President. He has not spent much time on this matter.
Candidate Sarath Fonseka has no choice but explain these matters
precisely. He owes it to the people of Sri Lanka to explain where they
stand with one of their Presidential candidates. Will he opt to forego
his Green-card or citizenship? The ball is squarely in his court. He
cannot dodge this one.
Strange bed-fellows
Sarath Fonseka as the common candidate of two parties with divergent
policies - UNP and JVP would also be placed in a situation of having to
juggle away some of the obvious points of contention between his
sponsors. The pro-Western UNP leadership and the radical anti-US
interest of the JVP would be like the mill stone round the neck of the
common candidate.
Those are serious matters for Fonseka to deal with and are already
surfacing with a vengeance. But the central issue of concern to the
country is how effective Fonseka could carry out his duties when such
glaring contradictions subvert his very existence. They say that the
bull and the buffalo would never pull the cart with the same rhythm. |