Today is Binara Poya
Buddhism and Science go together
Particle physicists emphasize the
role of the observer in defining anything. For example, from a certain
point of view, light is matter; from another point of view, it is
energy. What type of phenomenon light seems to exist as depends on many
variables, particularly on the conceptual framework the investigator is
using to analyze it. Thus, phenomena do not exist inherently as this or
that from their own sides, unrelated to the consciousness that perceives
them.
Lionel Wijesiri
Beginning in the nineteenth century and continuing to the present
day, both Buddhists and admirers of Buddhism have proclaimed the
compatibility of Buddhism and science. Their assertions have ranged from
modest claims about the efficacy of meditation for mental health to
grander declarations that the Buddha himself anticipated the theories of
relativity, quantum physics and the big bang more than two millennia
ago.
Alexander Berzin was one such person. He was born in 1944 in USA,
received his B.A. degree in 1965 from Rutgers University in conjunction
with Princeton University, his M.A. in 1967 and Ph.D. in 1972 from
Harvard University. For 30 years he studied Buddhism in India as a
Fulbright Scholar, studying and practicing with masters from all
Buddhist traditions.
In his book, Glimpse of Reality, he speaks in depth of the
relationship between Buddhism and science, and gives some specific
examples of points that they share in common. This short article is
based on his observations.
Creator
One of the conclusions that both science and Buddhism reach in common
is that there is no creator. In science, the theory of the conservation
of matter and energy states that matter and energy can neither be
created nor destroyed, only transformed. Buddhists totally agree and
extend the principle to mind as well. "Mind" in Buddhism is a
non-physical phenomenon which perceives, thinks, recognizes, experiences
and reacts to the environment it is in. A person's mind is a combination
of both the conceptual aspects and the non-conceptual aspects. It cannot
be created or destroyed, only transformed.
Thus, rebirth is simply a transformation in the ongoing continuity of
an individual's awareness of phenomena, but now with the physical basis
of another body.
Particle physicists emphasize the role of the observer in defining
anything. For example, from a certain point of view, light is matter;
from another point of view, it is energy. What type of phenomenon light
seems to exist as depends on many variables, particularly on the
conceptual framework the investigator is using to analyze it. Thus,
phenomena do not exist inherently as this or that from their own sides,
unrelated to the consciousness that perceives them.
Buddhism asserts the same thing: what things exist as depends on the
observer and the conceptual framework with which the person regards
them. For example, whether a certain situation exists as a horrible
problem or as something solvable depends on the observer, the person
involved. If somebody has the conceptual framework, "This is an
impossible situation and nothing can be done," then there really is a
difficult problem that cannot be solved.
However, with the frame of mind that thinks, "This is complicated and
complex, but there is a solution if we approach it in a different way,"
then that person is much more open to try to find a solution. What is a
huge problem for one person is not a big deal for another. It depends on
the observer, for our problems do not inherently exist as monstrous
problems. Thus, science and Buddhism come to the same conclusion:
phenomena exist as this or that dependent on the observer.
Dependability
Similarly, neurologists and Buddhists both note the dependently
arising relationship of things. For example, when the neurologists
examine the brain in an attempt to find what makes our decisions, they
find that there is no separate "decision-maker" in the brain. No little
person called "me" sits inside the head, receiving information from the
eyes, ears and so on, as if on a computer screen, and makes decisions by
pushing a button so that the arm does this and the leg does that.
Rather, decisions are the results of complex interactions of an enormous
network of nerve impulses and chemical and electrical processes.
Together, they bring the result, a decision.
This happens without there being a distinct entity that is a
decision- maker. Buddhism emphasizes the same thing: there is no "me"
which is permanent and solid sitting in our heads, which makes our
decisions.
Conventionally, we say, "I'm experiencing this. I am doing that," but
actually, what occurs is the result of a very complex interaction of
many different factors. Science and Buddhism are very close in this
regard.
Science and Buddhism also agree about the concept of "time." Buddhism
defines time as "a measurement of change." We can measure change in
terms of the motion of the planets or the position of the sun in the
sky.
We can measure it in terms of how many lectures we go to in a
semester - we have gone to twelve and two more are left - or we can
measure it in terms of physical, bodily cycles - the menstrual cycle,
the number of breaths we take, and so on. These are different ways of
measuring change and time is simply a measurement of change.
Time does exist, but according to how we think of it, time affects us
differently. For example, we think, "I only have one day left before the
exam!"
Because we are thinking of time in a small number, we get anxious
because we do not have enough time. If we think of it in a different
way, "There are twenty- four hours left," then there seems to be ample
time to do some preparation. Psychologically, it depends on how we look
at it. If we view time as something solid and oppressive, we will be
overwhelmed by it and will not have enough time. However, if we look at
it openly, as how much time we have, we will try to use it
constructively, instead of becoming upset.
Buddhism never demands us to have blind faith. On the contrary,
Buddha said, "Do not believe what I say just out of respect for me, but
test it out yourself, as if you were buying gold." That is true on all
levels. |