Mind your language
We are rather amused by a report from the UK that a
Sri Lankan-born man who came to Britain 17 years ago is refusing
to serve customers in his post office unless they speak English.
Our readers who had read the report on yesterday’s page one
would have felt the same way.
Deva Sumanasiri, 40, whose shop is in a racially mixed
inner-city area, believes he has to stand up for the English
language because otherwise the social fabric of the country will
disintegrate.
Asians, Eastern Europeans and others coming to his post
office in Nottingham, Central England, to claim state benefits
or post letters must speak English or they will not be served,
he has said.
This, we believe, is the first time that someone has enforced
such a ‘rule’ in England, which is now truly multi-lingual and
multi-cultural.
True, English is the main language in the UK and it is
extremely difficult to live there if you do not have a working
knowledge of that language.
Migrants to the UK, or for that matter, to any other English
speaking country, have to learn and live with English. In other
words, ‘when in Rome, do as the Romans do’.
Yet it does not mean that those who speak other languages for
whatever reason should be ignored or penalized in any way.
Speaking one’s own language in part of the world is a
fundamental right.
There is no hard and fast rule that one must always speak
English when in the UK, USA, Canada or Australia. In fact, some
cities in the US offer examinations, advice etc in more than 30
languages.
Moreover, no language is pure in that sense of the word.
English has thousands of words borrowed from other languages,
including the languages of migrants.
The irony is that Sumanasiri hails from a country which is
also multi-lingual and multi- cultural. In this case, an
expatriate has tried to be more British than the British
themselves. He cannot have forgotten his roots in just 17 years.
Migrants must assimilate, but they cannot forget who they are
or indeed their culture and language. These languages and
cultures enrich and enliven the countries that they choose as
their second home.
It shows the cultural and linguistic diversity of these
countries, which is the very basis of their democratic
traditions. Indeed, except for pockets of indigenous
populations, some countries such as the US and Australia were
completely founded by migrants.
In this light, Sumanasiri’s advice to migrants that “If you
don’t want to be British, go home,” seems harsh. Language, after
all, is just one of the things that measure how British or Sri
Lankan you are. There are many other factors that make you feel
you belong to a particular country.
Language should not be a bar to becoming a useful citizen of
one’s adopted country. Migrants must literally feel at home in
their adopted nations without being treated as second class
citizens on any account.
Town planning for North
With the Security Forces poised to capture the very
last LTTE dominated areas soon, the focus will shift to
rehabilitation and reconstruction of these areas as well as the
resettlement of residents. The North suffered heavily in the
conflict even more than the East and the scars of war are
everywhere in the province.
The areas previously controlled by the Tigers had seen no
development at all for around two decades and even many existing
infrastructure facilities have either been destroyed or
neglected. These areas have to be rebuilt virtually from
scratch, a Herculean task by any measure.
On the other hand, this presents an ideal opportunity for the
authorities to plan all stages of development well in advance
without paving the way for haphazard steps. Town
planning should be an integral component of the overall
development process in the North. We have seen and experienced
the ill effects of unplanned development - for example, Colombo
gets flooded even after half an hour of heavy rain. Unauthorized
structures complicate this picture further. Environmental
problems are common.
Planned cities and villages could address all these issues
systematically. All infrastructure facilities should be rebuilt
under such a plan, with ample room for environmental, waste
disposal and recycling measures.
More ‘Green’ buildings should be built - as an example, a
solar roof can help save electricity and money. In any case, the
restoration of mains power, water supplies and telecom links
will take some time.
The newly rebuilt cities should also be people-friendly and
even a total outsider should be able to feel familiar in a few
minutes. No room should be left for unauthorised structures.
Our planners should study successful planned cities in other
countries to see how they can be improved and adapted for our
requirements. In the North, they have a clean slate to begin
with and a fine opportunity to avoid the pitfalls of ad-hoc
development.
|