Worst recession in 100 years?
Martin KHOR
Britain premier Gordon Brown's closest economics advisor warned that
the world is facing its worst recession in a hundred years, thus
implying it will be worse than the Great Depression of the 1930s.
It was the bleakest scenario yet painted by a senior member of the
Western establishment. And in this scenario, the effects of the
recession will last 15 years.
The author of this is Ed Balls, one of Brown's closest allies and
confidants. He is a senior minister in charge of schools, and for many
years had he been the chief economic advisor of the UK Treasury, when
Brown was Chancellor.
Obama : Bill to avoid protectionism
|
Speaking at a Labour Party conference in the first week of February,
Balls said: "The reality is that this is becoming the most serious
global recession for, I'm sure, over 100 years, as it will turn out."
He warned that events worldwide were moving at a "speed, pace and
ferocity which none of us have seen before" and banks were losing cash
on a "scale that nobody believed possible".
He admitted that financial regulators had failed, saying: "People are
quite right to say that financial regulation wasn't tough enough in
Britain and around the world, that regulators misunderstood and did not
see the nature of the risks of the dangers being run in our financial
institutions - absolutely right."
He described the financial crisis as worse than the one in the 1930s
and hinted that the far right could gain ground, as they did then.
"The economy is going to define our politics in this region and in
Britain in the next year, the next five years, the next 10, and even the
next 15 years," said Balls. "These are seismic events that are going to
change the political landscape.
"I think this is a financial crisis more extreme and more serious
than that of the 1930s, and we all remember how the politics of that era
were shaped by the economy."
Balls' comments caused quite a lot of alarm because Brown had been
trying to give the impression the government had things under control,
even as bad news was emerging about big losses in banks, the latest
being Lloyds.
There is speculation that Balls has inside information on how very
bad the situation is, which the British government has not yet made
known to the public.
The UK Financial Services Authority also gave a warning, but milder,
that the recession "may be deeper and more prolonged than expected", and
added that the global financial system had "suffered its greatest crisis
in more than 70 years".
A meeting was held from 13-14 February in Rome attended by the
finance ministers and Central Bank governors of the Group of Seven
leading industrial countries to discuss the crisis.
Their statement at the end of the meeting did not contain anything
new on measures to manage the crisis. News reports indicate that one
major issue in the discussion was the need to prevent protectionist
measures, since such measures in one country could lead to retaliation
from others.
Accordingly, the statement pledged that "the G7 remains committed to
avoiding protectionist measures, which would only exacerbate the
downturn, to refraining from raising new barriers, and to working
towards a quick and ambitious conclusion of the Doha round".
But while the G7 Ministers pledged to avoid protectionism, a few of
their countries were in fact taking protectionist measures.
Meanwhile France announced bailout loans to its motorcar companies,
and tied these to their maintaining production and jobs in France,
thereby rousing anger from the Czech Republic which now fears that the
French car companies' factories in the country may retrench workers or
even close. The bigger worry, however, is the US$787bill fiscal stimulus
package passed by the US Congress on 13 February.
The bill, which was subsequently signed by President Barack Obama,
stipulates that none of the funds appropriated may be used for public
works projects "unless all of the iron, steel, and manufactured goods
used in the project are produced in the United States".
When a draft of the bill containing this clause was made known, it
led to protests from political leaders in Europe and Canada.
President Obama promised that the bill would be amended to avoid
protectionism. The final bill adds this line: "This section shall be
applied in a manner consistent with US obligations under international
agreements."
This is taken to mean that the buy-American principle would not be
implemented if it violates rules in the World Trade Organisation or in
free trade agreements that the US has signed.
However, there is cold comfort in this because the WTO's multilateral
rules do not forbid a country from having measures requiring that
spending by the government on its projects should be on locally produced
goods and services.
There is a plurilateral agreement on government procurement in the
WTO that obliges those who are members to allow the imported products or
services from other members to benefit from government spending.
The United States is a member of this agreement, thus it has to allow
fellow members to bid for projects under its stimulus package. But there
are only a few other members, and almost all of them are from developed
countries.
Developing countries will thus not be able to profit much from the
expanded government expenditure in the stimulus program, since almost no
developing country has signed the WTO's procurement agreement.
- Third World Network Features
The writer is Director of the Third World Network
|