What now, after the Gaza ceasefire?
Martin Khor
And so Israel has finally announced a unilateral ceasefire in its war
on Gaza, after 22 days of the most violent and aggressive bombardment of
Palestinians trapped in the small and overcrowded strip of land.
Israel claims victory while
announcing a ceasefire in its military actions in Gaza. But it has lost
much more than it gained, and the effects of its aggression have damaged
its image and the peace process. |
However, Israel has not completely pulled out all its troops as they
remained along the Gaza border. Neither is it lifting the siege, raising
the question how to bring supplies to a people who have been starved of
food and deprived of medical care and electricity.
Disastrous effects of war |
So long as troops and the siege continue, the war on Gaza is not yet
over, and the plight of the Palestinians continues.
Another immediate question is the response of Hamas. It has vowed to
fight on as long as Israeli troops are in Gaza. Whether rockets will
still be fired into Israel will be closely watched.
For weeks and years ahead, there will be heated debate on the Israeli
military action in Gaza, the disastrous effects on Palestinian lives,
and the political impact on Israel, Palestine and the region.
In announcing its ceasefire, the Israeli premier claimed victory,
saying its enemy Hamas has been weakened militarily and taught a lesson.
However, Israel's political goal of either toppling Hamas or
shattering its hold of power has failed. The reverse happened. Most
analysts believe Hamas has emerged with a much stronger political
standing among Palestinians and the Arab world, with its prestige having
risen for having stood its ground and resisted Israel's overwhelming
force.
Israel has indeed done a disservice to Hamas' rival, the Fatah and
the Palestinian Authority, whose image and legitimacy diminished
increasingly the more the war continued.
While Israel and its supporters tried to portray it as a war between
equals, the rest of the world saw it differently. It was a one-sided
onslaught of a powerful war machine using the most deadly and
sophisticated weapons against a defenceless people who have been
deprived of weapons, food and health care.
One of the atrocities has been the use of bombs that release clouds
of white phosphorous, which causes the most painful injury and death,
burning the skin to the bone.
As the borders were sealed, the Palestinians were unable to flee from
the war zone. They just became captives awaiting their fate. Over 1,200
died and more than 5,300 wounded, with grossly inadequate facilities to
treat the victims.
Israel's audacious action in the face of popular outrage around the
world was only possible because of the staunch support of the United
States Government. The Israeli Prime Minister even boasted how he phoned
President Bush to insist that the US abstain in the UN Security Council
vote calling for an immediate ceasefire.
The Bush administration supplied Israel with most of the weapons and
aircraft used in the war against Gaza. European countries are also not
blameless. While they decry the civilian deaths, they did not put
pressure, such as aid withdrawal, on Israel.
The double standards and hypocrisy are staggering. While billions of
dollars of funds and weapons are constantly supplied by the West to
Israel, there is a ban on any weapons to be obtained by the elected
Government in Gaza.
The Palestinians are thus prevented from defending themselves, while
they have to absorb the most horrendous bombardments. For almost two
years there has been a blockade of Gaza, preventing food and other
essential items from crossing the borders. When the Palestinians build
tunnels across the border with Egypt to enable the inflow of food and
essentials, this is portrayed as a crime.
Many people across the world asked these questions: Why deny weapons
to Gaza to protect itself while supplying such deadly and sophisticated
weapons to Israel which used them to such deadly effect? Why grudge the
people of Gaza to obtain food and medicines through the tunnels when
these essentials are blocked from entering by road or ships?
Perhaps the incoming US President, Barrack Obama, will act
differently from his disastrous predecessor who gave a blank cheque to
Israel. The speculation is that Israel decided on its ceasefire before
Obama took over office, as it is unsure whether the new President will
be as supportive as Bush. But even if he wants to be more even handed in
his approach to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, Obama faces the power
of the Israeli lobby. The US Congress on January 10 voted overwhelmingly
(390 to 4) to fully support Israel in its war action.
Another issue that will long be the subject of public outrage is the
heavy onslaught on civilians. Israel's propaganda machine insisted that
its military never targeted civilians, and blamed Hamas for 'hiding
among the people' and causing the civilian casualties.
Few bought this blame-the-victims story, since the majority of those
who died or were injured were civilians, including so many infants and
children. The head of the United Nations' relief agency expressed his
increasing anger on the effects of Israel's actions.
Israel claimed its bombing was based on pin-point precision, and
avoided civilian casualties. If there was such precision to avoid
civilians, why did its missiles hit United Nations facilities three
times?
First, a UN school was hit, killing 40. Second to be hit was the
headquarters of the UN relief agency where hundreds were seeking
shelter.
Just days later, two people were killed when missiles struck another
UN-run school, prompting the UN Secretary General Ban Ki-Moon to express
his 'outrage.'
Ban had been assured by Israel that the UN's premises would be fully
respected. Perhaps Israel wanted to 'teach a lesson' not only to Hamas
but also to the United Nations, whose officials had become increasingly
critical of Israel.
Many experts have described many of Israel's actions as war crimes.
United Nations senior officials have asked that the Israeli military be
held accountable for several incidents that caused the deaths of
civilians. Will there be follow-up actions to hold Israel to account?
That Israel's image in the eyes of the world has plummeted to a new
low may be one of the most important effects of its war on Gaza. The
peace process is in tatters. Palestinians understandably hold a deeper
grievance against a cruel power that killed and wounded the family
members of so many of them. Millions of people around the world came out
in protest to show their outrage.
At the end, it is hard to see what Israel has gained from its
'victory' in Gaza, while there are so many negative effects. The verdict
will likely be that this was a senseless and counter-productive three
weeks of aggression against an oppressed and defenceless people.
- Third World Network Features
(The writer is the Director of the Third World Network) |