Use and abuse of right to strike
Sq. Ldr. J. T. REX FERNANDO SLAF (Retd)
A trade union is an organisation of workers formed to promote,
protect and improve through collective action, the social, economic and
political interests of its members. While the philosophies of trade
unions have gradually changed with the times, trade unions are essential
entities in any democratic country and should be encouraged to represent
the voice of the workers.
Regrettably in Sri Lanka, trade unions which were formed to protect
the common interests of workers have become tools in the hands of power
seeking selfish individuals who sacrifice the interests of the country
and the workers, by launching ‘wild cat’ strikes.
During the past few months we have witnessed a surfeit of strikes,
demonstrations, protest marches and fasts.
Year No. of strikes/ Loss of
work stoppage man hours
1997 156 325,477
1998 122 270,145
1999 125 304,246
2000 87 64,481
2001 92 69,997
2002 104 70,250
2003 98 87,172
2004 90 81,100
2005 57 158,352
2006 52 4,895,148
2007 25 39,237
No strikes and loss of man hours from
1997 to 2007.
Total Number of strikes Loss of man hours
1008 6,365,605 |
What is puzzling the public is the absence of any sense of
responsibility and concern for the general public and the country as a
whole. Apparently the union leaders fail to realise the irreparable
devastating and paralysing effect on the economy. Offices are closed,
people are subject to untold misery to run helter skelter in search of
food, water and medicine. Schoolchildren and university undergraduates
are unable to pursue the studies, and the sick in hospitals facing an
unenviable trauma due to lack of power and water.
Ours is a developing country with limited resources and it is by
higher productivity that we can ensure more foreign investments and
economic development. Everyone accepts without dispute that investment
is essential for development and a harmonious labour relation is an
essential pre-requisite. Consequently, job creation is high up in the
country’s priorities. Investors will be wary and apprehensive if they
are not adequately certain that unions will act with a sense of
responsibility.
Considering the economic predicament, the enormity of the security
problem with an unprecedented escalation of terrorism any attempts to
destabilise the country by wild cat strikes will inevitably have adverse
effects on the economy. If the economy is given a further blow, the
beneficiaries would surely not be the working class.
RIGHT TO STRIKE
Most democratic countries have reformed their trade unions to ensure
that unions respond to wishes of the general membership. At present
workers are coerced to strike, if they do not they are harrassed.
The right to strike is one of the most fundamental rights enjoyed by
employees and unions and is an integral part of the right to defend
their economic and social interests.
While the law in several countries expressly recognise the right to
strike, in others strikes are prohibited. In some others limitations
exist in regard to certain types of strikes eg. General strikes, stay in
strikes, sympathetic strikes, strikes designed to inflict hardship on
the community or to coerce the government.
In certain countries a strike, if it does not resolve furtherance of
a trade union dispute within the industry concerned is prohibited.
Strikes may be considered legal, but as a breach of the contract
justifying dismissal as in Malaysia.
In Sri Lanka while the freedom of association is established in the
Constitution and in Statute from, there is no express right to workers
to go on strike.
ULTIMATE INSTRUMENT
A strike is meant to be the ultimate instrument in trade union
action; not a political tool to destabilise a Government as in the case
of the recent ‘General Strike’. What is worse is that strikes go against
the work ethos; and no nation was built on strikes, but on hard ‘work
harder for your larder’ was the slogan that broken-down Britain used to
rebuild after the ravages of World War II.
It is not trade unionism to resort to strike action for the slightest
grievance, which should be the ultimate weapon when negotiations fail.
The ‘Cart before the horse’ policy of striking first and then
negotiating is alien to trade unionism. It is regrettable that even
professionals, like the doctors and engineers have to restored to
strikes at the drop of a hat before the authorities have had time to
look into their grievances, regardless of loss of life that may ensue.
In essential services, unlawful striking can be considered criminal
negligence or even homicide.
The strikes and work stoppages which have been launched in recent
years have denied the country of ‘hundreds of thousands’ working hours
painting a gloomy picture in the minds of the investors and creating and
adverse image of the country in the global community, apart from the
untold hardships imposed on the public.
In 2006 the economy generated new jobs to only 60 per cent of those
entering the university according to the Central Bank. The failure to
create new jobs was not only due to the growth rate of 5.5 per cent, it
was also due to labour rigidity, strikes and industrial unrest which
drove away foreign investors and deterred local entrepreneurs from
investing.
Public sector
A study of each of the major strikes, particularly by public sector
employees, will indicate the devastating effect of each of these
strikes, had on the economy and the untold hardships imposed on the
general public. From the tabulation set out below one can possibly
realise the devastating effect on the economy consequent to the loss of
man hours.
The recent wild cat strikes launched by the doctors and certain
sections of the Ceylon Electricity Board, Railway Employees, Para Medic
and the hospital minor staff the recent strike by the trade unions of
health sector employees of Ratnapura robbed the lives of three innocent
patients.
These patients are from the poor and did not have the wherewithal to
enter a private hospital. So these trade unions are apparently
exercising power of life or death over a large section of our poor
people.
Unions are essential entities in any democratic country and should be
encouraged to represent the worker. The worker, however, must not be
suckered into launching unreasonable industrial wars that would only
lead to the closure of productive ventures. This will be eventually only
hurting themselves, and the country.
The need for unions to maintain their independence without aligning
themselves to any political party cannot be over emphasised.
Unfortunately trade unionism in Sri Lanka is mostly inspired by
political factions, with leaders aspiring to catapult themselves into
the political arena by championing the causes of the workers.
It is in the larger interest, both of the workers and the country,
that trade unions breakaway from the stranglehold of political parties.
Politicians have created divisions among workers and those differences
have stood in the way of worker’s unity, which is anathema to the ruling
elite who seem to have borrowed a leaf out of the colonialists’ book on
divide and rule policy.
Unless some meaningful action is taken to rid the country of strikes
for frivolous reasons by the public sector trade unions, the day will
not be too far when those given to ‘wild cat’ strikes will be strong
enough to paralyse the whole country. |