CMC dissolution: SC dismisses rights plea
Wasantha Ramanayake
The Supreme Court yesterday terminated the rights application against
the failure of the Chief Minister to take any action in terms of the law
to arrest the malpractices and irregularities of the Colombo Municipal
Council (CMC).
The court refused a motion seeking to support the application for the
Leave to Proceed filed by the petitioners, 111 rate payers of the CMC.
The petitioners stated that the first respondent Chief Minister had
acted arbitrarily and unlawfully to suspend the CMC under the Section 3
(111) of the powers of the Supervision of Administration of Local
Authorities Statute and had appointed a special commission to find the
persons who are guilty of malpractices which was not ex facie applicable
to present instance since the single person commission had already found
mayor and the council members guilty of such malpractices.
They further stated that court had directed the Chief Minister on the
last occasion in terms of the Section 2(2) of the Statute to remove the
Mayor, any or all the members of the council or to dissolve the council.
The Bench comprised Chief Justices Sarath N. Silva PC, Nimal Gamini
Amaratunga and P.A. Ratnayake PC.
President's Counsel Mohan Pieris for the Chief Minister submitted
that the single person commission headed by Justice Chandradasa
Nanayakkara had wrongfully found all the council members guilty of six
charges out of nine charges of irregularities and malpractice.
He submitted that ten council members who had opposed these
resolutions had also wrongfully been found guilty. He submitted that the
first respondent had accordingly appointed a special commission of
inquiry headed by former Supreme Court Judge Justice Hector Yapa to find
the wrongdoers.
The court noted that the Chief Minister first satisfy himself as to
whether the council members had acted wrongfully before removing any of
them or dissolving the CMC since they were democratically elected by the
people.
The petitioners complained that their rights had been violated by the
first respondent and by the CMC and sought to dissolve the council.
G.G. Arulpragasam appeared for the petitioners.
President's Counsel Mohan Pieris appeared for the first respondent.
|