Buddhist Spectrum
Path to ‘non extremist’ living - The Buddhist way
Dr Vidhura MAHENDRA
“Oh! Uncle, I stepped on that snail and it was completely crushed, I
feel very bad of that.” My colleague’s 8 year old son lamented.
“Don’t worry son, you did not purposely crush the poor snail, so you
would not commit a sin.” I responded to him.
“In fact, the Buddha has told us that if you kill someone by accident
or without the thought of it, there won’t be a sin in it. That is why it
is not an extreme religion, many things happen without our knowledge
this is why we need to look around us and be vigilant.” I added.
‘Extremism’ along with ‘racism’, ‘sexism’, ‘fanaticism’ and
‘nepotism’ are some common tags we come across in the modern world.
Inception of globalisation has enhanced the utility of these words among
socio-political avenues.
Due to interactive media these words have been widely used to render
lucrative finances for certain hidden agendas.
However, one must critically analyse why and how these concepts have
unfolded over the years.
Sri Lanka, a country with a 2550-year history of Buddhism, can easily
brag for its great diversity among many cultures largely due to Buddhist
influence and its nature for being a ‘non-extremist’ religion.
Buddhism, as many would acknowledge, is a governing philosophy that
has survived through the years in Sri Lanka despite the European
invasion and colonisation for over 500 years. So it is significant how
it survived in a tiny country like Sri Lanka with a clear majority of
Buddhists and others who respect equally.
The Buddha has vehemently shown the lay person that ‘extreme’ nature
of living is detrimental to one’s life hence the ‘Middle Path’, (Medum
Piliwetha or Madhyama Prathipadawa = abstaining from addictive
sense-pleasures and self-mortification) must be cultivated.
He further envisaged that the middle-path leads to Nirvana, which
means following of the Noble Eightfold Path (Ari ataga maga or Arya
ashtanginga margaya): right understanding, right thought, right speech,
right action, right livelihood, right effort, right mindfulness and
right concentration.
The nature of the ‘non extremism’ leads to fruitful relations among
various communities and most notably the multi-cultural societies of the
present day.
It is believed that during the time of the Buddha there lived six
known Shramanas or philosophers in India: Purana Kassapa (Amoralism -
denies any reward or punishment for either good or bad deeds), Makkhali
Gosala (Fatalism - we are powerless; suffering is pre-destined), Ajita
Kesakambali (Materialism - with death, all is annihilated), Pakudha
Kaccayana (Eternalism - Matter, pleasure, pain and the soul are eternal
and do not interact), Niganta Nataputta or Jaina Mahaveera (Restraint -
be endowed with, cleansed by and suffused with the avoidance of all
evil) and finally Sanjaya Belatthaputta (Agnosticism - I don’t think so.
“I don’t think in that way or otherwise. I don’t think not or not
not.”). The aforementioned philosophers were well respected by their
followers but logically and conveniently sidelined by the Buddha’s
vision of ‘middle-path’ or the non-extremism backed up by Buddhist
practical living style.
This was even more obvious when the Buddha expressed that food may be
required upon hunger prior to listening Dhamma.
Buddhists and non-Buddhists alike can discover more from this great
vision of the middle path or the ‘Non-extremism’ for our contemporary
socio-political issues too.
Prime example for such agenda is the so-called ‘war’ in Sri Lanka.
The war was primarily created by a segment of separatist extremism than
a meaningful justifiable cause.
It was inevitable that such wars were created in the past too by
power hungry sectors of extreme nature to reap financial gain than that
for constructive humanity.
Some foreign influences vie with different agendas of extremeness
which leads to misconception and bewilderment of many Buddhist values to
tarnish the great religion.
However, as a philosophy the greatness of Buddhism of being a ‘non
extremist’ religion relies on the expediency and its followers with
virtues.
ABHIDHAMMA IN A NUTSHELL - V:
The Sixth Sense
Shamika SOYSA
Imagine a situation where you had become emotional. You were burning
with anger or weeping with sadness or laughing with joy. At such
instances you may have experienced that change in your blood circulation
and your chest area becomes hot or you would feel the situation in your
heart.
Recall a situation where you are concentrating hard to solve a
difficult mathematical problem. Even though you had seen the
mathematical problem from your eyes many things happen inside your head
and you will feel some pain, toughness or hardness in your head.
In a written examination you will see the problem from your eyes. But
when you answer, from where you recall and retrieve all the required
materials?
When you sleep you dream. You hear sounds when dreaming. Do you
really acquire objects from five senses when you dream?
When you are relaxing you will recall many things happened in past.
You would go to many places from mind. You would call these things as
“Memories”.
To acquire forms, sounds, odour, taste and touches we have five sense
organs. But from where the above explained objects are acquired? The
“Sixth Sense” comes into act at this instance.
Objects enter through the five sense organs. Therefore they are known
as “Doors” (Dhvara) and the five sense organs are also known as “Five
Sense-doors” (Panchadhvara).
The sixth sense which acquires any other object and subject to any of
the scenarios explained above is know as “Mind-door” (Manodhvara) and
the objects acquired by the mind-door are known as Dhamma. For example
what we call as “Memory” is acquired and processed by the mind-door.
However, whenever an object interacts with any of the five
sense-doors it strikes the mind-door as well which is to be explained in
future with thought process (chiththa vithi).
Rootless Functional Consciousness - Ahethuka Kriya Chiththas
15 Types of rootless resultant consciousness (ahethuka vipaka
chiththas) were discussed in the last article. Following are the 3 types
of rootless functional consciousness;
Kriya Chiththas (3)
Functional Consciousness (3)
16. Upekkha Sahagatha Panchadhvarawajjana Chiththa
Five Sense-door adverting consciousness accompanied by indifference
17. Upekkha Sahagatha Manodhvarawajjana Chiththa
Mind-door adverting consciousness accompanied by indifference
18. Somanassa Sahagatha Hasithuppadha Chiththa
Smile-producing consciousness accompanied by pleasure
It was explained in the previous article that dvipanchavinna
chiththas arise at the moment of five sense-object interaction and
receiving-consciousness (sampatijjana) arises to receive or accept the
object and thereafter investigating-consciousness (santhiranaya) arises
to investigate the object received by sampatijjana.
If the object is a five sense-object, the consciousness turned
towards one of them is Five Sense-door adverting (Panchadhvaravajjana)
consciousness, accompanied by indifference (upekkha sahagatha). If it
turns towards the mind-door, then it is Mind-door adverting (Manodhvaravajjana)
consciousness, accompanied by indifference (upekkha sahagatha).
The ways of smiling
There are six classifications of smile according to Buddhism. (1)
Sita - a smile manifesting itself in expression and countenance; (2)
Hasita - smile consisting in the slight movements of the lips just
enough to reveal the tips of the teeth; (3) Vihasita - laughter giving
out a light sound; (4) Upahasita - laughter accompanied by the movement
of the head, shoulders, and arms; (5) Apahasita - laughter accompanied
by the shedding of tears; and (6) Atihasita - an outburst of laughter
accompanied by the forward and backward movements of the entire body
from head to foot.
Arhaths smile only in the ways of Sita and Hasitha. The third kriya
chiththa arises at the time an Arhath smiles (hasithuppadha) and it is
accompanied by pleasurable feeling (somanassa sahagatha).
There are 20 functional consciousnesses on the 89 types of
consciousness. The first two rootless functional consciousnesses (ahethuka
kriya chiththas) are the only kriya chiththas arise for ordinary people
(puthajjana). The rest of the 18 arise only for Arhaths.
To summarise, following are the 18 types of ahethuka chitthas which
are categorised into three classes which was discussed in this article
and the previous;
1. Immoral Resultant Consciousness (Akusala Vipaka Chiththa) - 7
2. Moral Resultant Consciousness (Kusala Vipaka Chiththa) - 8
3. Functional Consciousness (Kriya Chiththa) - 3
Reference
Abhidharma Margaya by Ven. Prof. Renukane Chandhawimala Thera,
A Manual of Abhidhamma by Ven. Narada Maha Thera
THE BUDDHIST COLUMN:
Intellectual discussion
Sachitra Mahendra
Survival of the Buddhist philosophy totally depends on the
association of wise. Why is the survival of the philosophy needed? The
Buddhist philosophy has methods of relief for those unhappy in
technologically advanced society.
We have got almost everything we need, and our strong need is to be
happy. Intellectual discussion is one way to be happy. Intellectual
discussion itself is a broad concept. An intellectual can live in any
person, not only among university dons and other scholars.
There are people who know only a little, but essential features,
whereas we come across erudite scholars interpreting their knowledge in
diverse ways.
An erudite scholar may attempt to interpret and publish another book.
They hardly attempt to adopt what they have learned into their daily
life. People with little, but essential knowledge, are most practical.
They attempt to adopt the essential knowledge they have into the normal
life. By hearting thousand stanzas will be useless, if you don’t apply
them into practice.
Why intellectual discussion? It is basically required to keep on
updating your existing knowledge base. This is helpful to tolerate the
pains we come across.
For instance, we keep on listening to Dhamma Chakkapavattana Sutta,
which describes the natural disasters we face in life. But when we
encounter them personally, we become shocked. We have listened to the
Sutta, but did not try to realise the contents. An intellectual
discussion is required to work on how to adopt the theory into practice.
People in the Buddha’s period did not have the written form to
discuss what they have heard. The absence of a written medium could make
them remember what they have heard very clear. They all had a sharp
memory. Ven. Ananda is the most common example of the memory strength.
They could discuss the Dhamma they have heard.
This hardly happens today. We listen to endless sermons almost
everyday. Dozens of books on Buddhism are being published regularly. We
listen to and read the philosophy everyday, and we hardly have time to
contemplate and review what we have heard and read. We do not discuss
but add many things to our head. If we can discuss how to apply
essential features of the philosophy in daily life, that will wipe out
most of our sorrows.
However intellectual discussion does not help always. What we have
discussed some time ago will go away from the memory, which is natural.
We should keep on discussing.
Engrossed in Dhamma does not mean escaping from the day-to-day life.
Dhamma reminds you the nature of life, when you face things like getting
sick and decaying body.
How do we get association of wise? It may be hard to find anybody
with a sharp knowledge of the essential features of Dhamma. The best
thing, in a case like this, is to write down your inspirational ideas on
Dhamma. When you read Dhamma Chakkapavattana Sutta, you slowly realise
decaying body is something natural which happens to anybody and
unavoidable.
However in another occasion, you will be upset to see the decaying
body, because the memory of Dhammachakkapavattana Sutta has faded off.
You will have to be watchful of the mind in such instances. When some
such thing occurs, you should go back to the Sutta, or the inspirational
notes you have written down on the Sutta.
When nobody is around to have intellectual discussion, the best
person is your self. Discuss with self. Keep on analysing what we have
heard on Dhamma.
There is nothing to be frustrated over in this life. Many people are
ignorant and they are subject to do ignorant deeds. What the Buddha’s
philosophy teaches us is to be indifferent considering the
circumstances. And this is what we keep on forgetting, and what we
should write down somewhere to be referred whenever it slips our memory.
[email protected]
Criminology as portrayed in Jataka stories
Criminological aspects in Jathaka tales
Sudheera Jayawardene
New Vidyadara publication
175 pages. Rs. 400
According to Martin Wickramasinghe, Jataka book is the best work to
be introduced for world literature from Sinhalese literature. In fact
Jataka tales have pervaded the local culture in many ways. Much literary
research has been done on Jathaka tales too.
Prof. Sunanda Mahendra discovered creative aspects in Jataka tales.
Dr. D V J Harischandra discovered psychiatric aspects in Jataka tales.
Sudheera Jayaweera, a lecturer from Sri Jayawardenepura University has
lately brought out a book on criminological aspects in Jataka stories.
The work contains 6 chapters:
1.Introduction and Methodology
2.Theoretical background of the crimes in the Jathaka Stories
3.Jathaka stories and the types of the crimes
4.Deviance behaviour reflected from the Jathaka stories
5.Criminal investigation methods in the Jathaka society
6.Criminal Justice system of the Jathaka society
Jathaka stories reveal the Indian society that existed thousand years
ago. There are hardships a social scientist faces when scanning
criminological features in an ancient society. Many scholars argue that
the present story of the Jathaka story is not appropriate to the
development of the plot.
However Jayawardene’s point is that even the present story sometimes
exhibit the required criminology factors. For example Thipallatthamiga
Jathaka’s present story brings out child exploitation. As the focus of
Jathaka stories is religion, the dealing of crime should be done with
utmost care.
Jayawardene also mentions that the study of the whole text is not
essential to focus on criminology portrayed in the book. Although the
super-human power disturbs criminological interpretation, there are
helpful instances. Vedabbha Jathaka for instance relates a story about a
super-powered saint who fell into the hands of thieves and how the death
of both thieves and the saint follows in the aftermath.
The modern research methodology involves analysis based on data
collection. However Jathaka stories reveal the social set up of thousand
years ago, hence a different method should be adopted. According to the
Jathaka tales, there were villages of thieves too.
Some Jathaka stories have superb detective-style qualities. Ummagga
Jatakaya is the best example, where the protagonist solves a number of
issues with his detective power.
“In Ummagga Jatakaya and Mahasupina Jatakaya there exist almost all
the unconscious mechanisms that Freud described over six centuries later
– including symbolisation, condensation, displacement and secondary
elaboration.” - Dr. D V J Harischandra. – SM
Some works used by the author
1.Criminology by F Muller and Luafer
2.Sociological Research Methods. An Introduction by M Bulmer
3.Foundation of Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice by G R Cadwell
4.The Jataka or stories of the Buddha’s former births by E W Cowell
5.The Oxford Handbook of Criminology
6.New Horizons in Research Methodology by N Ratnapala
7.Crime and Punishment in the Buddhist tradition by N Ratnapala
8.The Buddhist Jataka stories and The Russian Novel by Martin
Wickramasinghe
|