Change Management: Emerging need for SAARC
Kazi Mohoshin Al Abbas
In the discipline of Management Science, Change Management is one of
the important, vast, complex and sensitive components. As far as present
statehood is concerned, governing of a nation is equally dependent on
leadership quality and management skills.
And of course, change management is nowadays a very important
phenomenon of governance as technology is changing almost in every year,
international political equilibrium running through almost unpredictable
dynamics, regional economics is reshaping sharply and national political
scenarios are modifying frequently.
SA Region
In terms of above mentioned phenomena, South Asian (SA) Region is
running through a changing time. Pakistan, Nepal, Bangladesh, India,
Bhutan have witnessed sharp changes in political chime. Sri Lanka,
Maldives and Afghanistan are a littlie bit static with their problems
and prospects.
The last SAARC Summit was held in New Delhi |
Bhutan has a significant progress towards democracy. The Himalayan
monarchy is moving towards Democracy and already the country has
conducted a general election and going to enact a democratic
constitution, which may lead the country to a republic.
With this progress, the administration and of course the Royal
Members should prepare themselves for a changed governance pattern,
though it is a tough job, the nation should manage the change by any
means.
Failure of the management of changing factors may cause for a social,
political and cultural commotion. It is expected that the nation would
be able to manage the changes by their own. As far as South Asia is
concerned, South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation (SAARC)
members should be proactive for capacity building of the Bhutan if their
nation needs or wants to do so.
In Nepal there is a very significant and historic change in terms of
social and political phenomena. The people of Nepal changed the
240-year-old monarchy by a general election, in which Maoist emerged
with majority that also an indication of change in political practice
and culture.
To understand the changing phenomena of Nepal we should look back to
the student’s movement of 80s of last century which was led to a peoples
upsurge and finally the royal power vowed to make it as a constitutional
monarchy.
The King went behind the screen; the politicians come down on the
stage of politics and government. The then student leaders of Nepal
stated at that time that the job was well done but half done. This
comment became a true when a blood shed went on in royal family and the
absolute monarchy came back.
Social changes
This happened in Nepal for not considering the social changes by the
authorities and they were not able to go through a proper change
management process that pushed the nation along bloody internal conflict
and again pressed the country on a changing situation.
As of the current political accomplishments, it must be logical to
comment that all concerned of the country are concentrating on politics,
especially on power game only. The changes of social phenomena,
structure of power in rural Nepal, cultural changes and the aspiration
of people are a bit less understood by the politicians.
Hoping that the experienced and learned political leaders of Nepal
would be keen to and able to manage the changes, otherwise it could be
led to another social and political deviation.
Political scenario
Pakistan, as a nation is managing a very frequently changing
political scenario. At first, it should be mentioned that with the blood
of Benazir Bhutto Pakistan earned an elected government and a parliament
instead of military dictatorship or military-backed democracy.
After having an elected government the nation is fighting against the
autocratic system which was built up under an undemocratic authoritarian
administration. But the majority of the population, especially the
educated people want to be ruled by a democratic system and want to live
in a peaceful environment.
The present coalition government is the result of the changed
sentiment of people. Moreover, there is another change going on through
the common Pakistani’s psychology in terms of opposition to feudal lords
and apparently be keen towards business community.
For an example: it could be cited that when PPP and Muslim League (Nawaz)
were negotiating the structure of government, landlords were under
pressure not to be in power-center. As of now, the business community is
the emerging social power and landlords are crumbling in terms of social
influence. The nation should manage the social changes with wisdom,
skill and brilliancy.
Very recently in the political pitch of India, Congress has lost its
grip and no other party, except BJP, has a nation-wide presence. As a
result political alliances are in a frequent reshaping process.
As of my personal memory, in the year of 1990 a South, South-East
Asian Student Leaders Consultation meeting was held in Allahabad, India.
Lal Bahadur Singh was the president of Allahabad University Student
Union and host of the student leaders gathered in the city.
Opposed
I was personally present in the programme and we were talking about
the problems of the region and the globe.
At one stage of discussion, religious fundamentalism came up as one
of social problem in India. Lal Bahadur Singh opposed the opinion and
said that this is a problem of Pakistan and for Bangladesh as a legacy.
After a decade it was proven by the time that this issue was a problem
of South Asia and of course no need of examples.
It was not the problem of Mr. Singh, it was the mental frame of
educated middle class of India.
This change in Indian mass psychology was ignored by the social and
political leaders and as a consequence they lost their base. Present
trend of change in the Indian socio-political hemisphere is basically
linked to the booming private sector economy.
As of my understanding corporate culture does not run through a
democratic practice. It is mostly run by an autocratic manner with a
blending of flexibility, which is apparently a democratic practice but
in reality it is autocracy. On the contrary, the political practice of
India is a better democratic practice in the globe.
The internal contradiction of corporate influence and traditional
democracy makes a bizarre in the social trends and evolution. This
phenomenon must be endorsed by the social, political and civil society
leaders.
It should be told that Bangladesh is the country of frequent
political change among the SAARC members. At the time of its birth, the
nation’s dream was to be a democratic country with socialist economic
system.
Few days later Bangladesh experienced a one-party system then
military autocracy and finally a Westminster Democratic system, which
was emerged apparently as feudal democracy.
After a long journey, the present Bangladesh is governed by an extra
constitutional but socially excepted interim government that is
committed to make Bangladesh a Democracy.
Zigzag journey
Through this zigzag journey, the society lost its democratic norms,
tolerance and honour to others; average social honesty is also grilled
by a big question.
Moreover, in rural Bangladesh non-farm activities have enhanced
significantly and absorbing the rural unemployed agriculture manpower, a
stronger business community has emerged in the power circle, NGO
activities are also become a part of social life, and exported manpower
has also a significant role in socio-psychological changes.
On the other hand, fundamentalism is also a social change which is
contrary to secularism that the spirit of independence movement. These
changes should be managed by the social and political leaders with due
attention.
Internal changes
Among the SAARC members, Maldives is a country of stability yet. But
people are increasingly empowered by information and various schools of
thoughts and obviously there are some changes going on in the society
and social psychology. If the nation does not able to meet the demand of
time, internal changes could lead to change of social power structure.
Afghanistan and Sri Lanka are living with conflict and war. The
changes in society and social psychology should be observed sharply to
protect any emergence of chauvinism.
Here should be discussed that South Asia has a single ancient history
with different heritage, tradition and socio-cultural diversity.
To understand the commonness and uniqueness of social changes of the
region among various entities, we should go through the ancient history
that could help us to manage the changing phenomena of the region.
Shearing of experience among SAARC members is also an essential for
social development of the region. In view of human development, to
manage the changes, developing people-to-people relations and ensuring
collective efforts by the Political Leaders of SAARC countries are the
must.
The upcoming SAARC summit which will be held in Sri Lanka could be
the forum to determine the changing phenomena of the region and a point
to develop a system to manage the Changes. In view of all, SAARC should
be more effective and stronger to face the Global Challenges as well.
The Author is a senor journalist based in Dhaka. His special focus
areas are the socio-political developments in South Asia. |